Is your sin "Original"?

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
polonius
Prodigy
Posts: 3904
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2015 3:03 pm
Location: Oregon
Been thanked: 1 time

Is your sin "Original"?

Post #1

Post by polonius »

Another bible fiction which became rather pervasive in Christianity is the claim of the "stain" of Original Sin (the first sin of Adam) of which we all bear the guilt even though we were born thousand of years after it was committed.

Because we all have this "stain," a "merciful God"(?) damns the unbaptized to spend eternity suffering in hell even infants who die. Or so the story goes.

Later on it was agreed that this was rather harsh, so the unbaptized not guilty of any serious sin were consigned to 'Limbo" a state of "natural happiness" in which, however, the person is denied the beatific vision of God which was important for some reason.

Many Catholics and Protestants haven't kept up so don't realize that Pope Francis abolished it obviously because it was realized that it was a fiction.

However, the full effect of this hasn't been felt yet. The Catholic Church's "doctrine" of Mary's Immaculate Conception is also void if there is no Original Sin to begin with. ;)

User avatar
onewithhim
Savant
Posts: 10912
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:56 pm
Location: Norwich, CT
Has thanked: 1542 times
Been thanked: 443 times

Post #81

Post by onewithhim »

[Replying to post 69 by William]

As far as I can see, there is no place in the Bible that teaches us that we ARE SPIRIT. That seems to be your opinion.

As for the writer of Ecclesiastes, he may have been depressed---no one knows---but God saw fit to have his writings in the Bible canon. We can think of Solomon's writings as approved of by God.

It's interesting that people often say what you said about him being depressed, and therefore, they say, we can't believe what he says......Yet they go on to "prove" that we have a spirit that leaves the body and goes on living, consciously, with God, by quoting Ecclesiastes 12:7 !! I guess he wasn't depressed then?

These verses do not contradict themselves. They would if you believe that we have a spirit that is conscious after death. But to believe Ecclesiastes 9:5, we are not clashing with 12:7. The "spirit" is not a conscious part of us that goes on living. It is only the LIFE FORCE that God sends out to keep a person alive. It is not conscious after death. It is just POWER, if you will.

It is good to read the Scriptures again. If you want good reasonable explanations, also, go to the website www.jw.org .

brianbbs67
Guru
Posts: 1871
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 12:07 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Post #82

Post by brianbbs67 »

ttruscott wrote:
brianbbs67 wrote: God created Adam and Eve in His image. Fast forward to Gen 5:3. "Adam created beings in his likeness." There is a distinction made in Gen 5 between man that God made and man that man(Adam ) made.
It seems that everyone has at least one interpretation to accept what the scripture says to justify their acceptance of this blasphemy though no one will ever answer my questions as to Why GOD would ever force HIS bride (or anyone) to be evil nor how it does not contradict the verses I quoted. No one... They quote their own verses as if they can contradict each other but that is bogus too.
Oh you misunderstand, I don't believe in original sin. Through one man sin was brought into the world. We are not born sinning. We choose too later. God would not make us evil and them condemn us for it. We choose evil and that is what He condemns.

User avatar
William
Savant
Posts: 15237
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:11 pm
Location: Te Waipounamu
Has thanked: 974 times
Been thanked: 1799 times
Contact:

Post #83

Post by William »

[Replying to post 80 by]

onewithhim: As far as I can see, there is no place in the Bible that teaches us that we ARE SPIRIT.

William: The breath of GOD is one such place.

onewithhim:That seems to be your opinion.

William: Have you ever left your body? I have. This is how I know...not by reading about it or simply being opinionated. It is through personal experience. As such, it allows for me to understand at least that secret of the kingdom of the Metaphysical Universe.
If you want to believe you are actually just are a cadaver which is puppeteered by some spirit you think of as your God, you are entitled to have that opinion about your-self.

User avatar
ttruscott
Site Supporter
Posts: 11064
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:09 pm
Location: West Coast of Canada
Been thanked: 3 times

Post #84

Post by ttruscott »

brianbbs67 wrote:
ttruscott wrote:
brianbbs67 wrote: God created Adam and Eve in His image. Fast forward to Gen 5:3. "Adam created beings in his likeness." There is a distinction made in Gen 5 between man that God made and man that man(Adam ) made.
It seems that everyone has at least one interpretation to accept what the scripture says to justify their acceptance of this blasphemy though no one will ever answer my questions as to Why GOD would ever force HIS bride (or anyone) to be evil nor how it does not contradict the verses I quoted. No one... They quote their own verses as if they can contradict each other but that is bogus too.
Oh you misunderstand, I don't believe in original sin. Through one man sin was brought into the world. We are not born sinning. We choose too later. God would not make us evil and them condemn us for it. We choose evil and that is what He condemns.
Thank you for clarifying. I was indeed making a mistake. But only sinners die and people die from earliest conception to the time we finally choose sin. If death proves sin, how can infants die before they ever chose sin?

And if an infant can choose sin, when does that impulse to sin come from?
PCE Theology as I see it...

We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.

This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.

User avatar
William
Savant
Posts: 15237
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:11 pm
Location: Te Waipounamu
Has thanked: 974 times
Been thanked: 1799 times
Contact:

Post #85

Post by William »

@83

ttruscott: If death proves sin, how can infants die before they ever chose sin?

And if an infant can choose sin, when does that impulse to sin come from?


Paul: Once I was alive apart from the law; but when the commandment came, sin sprang to life and I died.

brianbbs67
Guru
Posts: 1871
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 12:07 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Post #86

Post by brianbbs67 »

ttruscott wrote:
brianbbs67 wrote:
ttruscott wrote:
brianbbs67 wrote: God created Adam and Eve in His image. Fast forward to Gen 5:3. "Adam created beings in his likeness." There is a distinction made in Gen 5 between man that God made and man that man(Adam ) made.
It seems that everyone has at least one interpretation to accept what the scripture says to justify their acceptance of this blasphemy though no one will ever answer my questions as to Why GOD would ever force HIS bride (or anyone) to be evil nor how it does not contradict the verses I quoted. No one... They quote their own verses as if they can contradict each other but that is bogus too.
Oh you misunderstand, I don't believe in original sin. Through one man sin was brought into the world. We are not born sinning. We choose too later. God would not make us evil and them condemn us for it. We choose evil and that is what He condemns.
Thank you for clarifying. I was indeed making a mistake. But only sinners die and people die from earliest conception to the time we finally choose sin. If death proves sin, how can infants die before they ever chose sin?

And if an infant can choose sin, when does that impulse to sin come from?
Everyone dies here. "My breath will not abide with man , forever. His days shall be 120 years."

Sinning is defined as Breaking God's law. Since infants don't know and understand the law, they can't be condemned for it. So, death doesn't prove sin, necessarily. Death proves life as a human.

User avatar
ttruscott
Site Supporter
Posts: 11064
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:09 pm
Location: West Coast of Canada
Been thanked: 3 times

Post #87

Post by ttruscott »

brianbbs67 wrote:Sinning is defined as Breaking God's law. Since infants don't know and understand the law, they can't be condemned for it. So, death doesn't prove sin, necessarily. Death proves life as a human.
Well argued secular interpretation for a hard theological doctrine. BUT: death is the wages for sin has a real meaning and was written to instruct us in something.

Wages and the person earning them is a pretty strict metaphor - no one is paid the wage if they do not deserve it. And if anyone can die without earning death by sin then this verse is meaningless so I must ask how you fit it into your understanding.

Please consider:
1.
Ezekiel 9:5 As I listened, he said to the others, “Follow him through the city and kill, without showing pity or compassion. 6 Slaughter old men, young men and maidens, women and children, but do not touch anyone who has the mark. Begin at my sanctuary.� So they began with the elders who were in front of the temple. This suggests GOD's wrath includes children. There is no hint here that HE is killing them to save them.

Gen 6
11 Now the earth was corrupt in God’s sight and was full of violence.
12 God saw how corrupt the earth had become, for all the people on earth had corrupted their ways.
13 So God said to Noah, “I am going to put an end to all people, for the earth is filled with violence because of them. I am surely going to destroy both them and the earth.
Babies too were destroyed in this judgment upon sin.

Also, when God smote the nations did He not order the killing of everyone? Do we not see that as judgement for sin?
Ex 12:29 The Lord kills all the first-born in the land of Egypt.
Num 21:3 The Israelites utterly destroy the Canaanites.
Deut 2:33-34 The Israelites utterly destroy the men, women, and children of Sihon.
Deut 3:6 The Israelites utterly destroy the men, women, and children of Og.
Children are not treated as innocents, are they?

2.
IF babies who die prior to the age of accountability automatically go to heaven without any free will choice to become saved or to reject salvation, by a God who does not want people to go to hell as per:
2 Peter 3:9: ....He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance, THEN WHY are NOT all humans saved this way if it is a legitimate way to be saved?

Why do some die to automatically go to heaven and some live to get tested, some to their annihilation or eternal torment? Why some and not others? I feel left out of the automatic heavenly club - God should have killed me as a child!! What a lot of suffering it would have saved the people I've hurt.

3.
Romans 5:
13 For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.
14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses

People's New Testament commentary on 5:13:
For until the law sin was in the world. Paul now shows that all must have sinned in Adam. Until law is given sin is not imputed. Yet sin must have been in the world from the time of Adam until the law of Moses, because death, which is due to sin, reigned. The prevalence of death proved the existence of sin.
Death between Adam and Moses proves sin.
Without law there is no sin.
Therefore these deaths prove they broke a law.

Some interpret Paul as saying that they were included in Adam's law breaking, "Do not eat..." which may seem necessary even though a blasphemy if you do not know of any other law. Others contend that they broke a law in the spirit world before being born on earth, the command to "come out from among them and touch not the unclean thing" given to HIS elect so the non-elect could be judged and later repeated to HIS sinful church, and

1 John 2:7 I write no new commandment unto you, but an old commandment which ye had from the beginning. The old commandment is the word which ye have heard from the beginning. I cannot help but think that John was alluding to Isaiah 40:21 Do you not know? Have you not heard? Has it not been told you from the beginning? Have you not understood since the earth was founded? If he is not alluding to Isaiah, he certainly is referring to the same truth in my opinion, and Isaiah's beginning is the foundation of the world when we were supposedly taught something...

1 John 3:11 For this is the message that ye heard from the beginning, that we should love one another. I believe that John is referring to the loving purpose GOD has for each of us. 1 John 3:23 And this is His commandment, That we should believe on the name of His Son, Jesus Christ, and love one another, as He gave us commandment.

Also if death reigned over these people due to sin, breaking a law, then GOD's judgement and execution of them was justified, as in the Flood and at Sodom and Gomorrah.

It is said that since babies have no understanding of the law so there can be no imputation of sin until an age of accountability (finally understanding the law, aka the difference between good and bad), therefore they die innocent and go to heaven. But here we see that pre-Moses "no imputation of sin" unto those who had no sin imputed to them after their birth were not saved from GOD's righteous judgment of their evil unto their destruction.

4.
Can babies sin in the womb?
Genesis 25:22 And the children [Jacob and Esau] struggled together within her. Hebrew tradition has them trying to kill each other as the word translated as struggle, wrestle, really means to crush each other to pieces and the euphemisms were chosen to purposefully avoid any hint that they were being sinful. Now, if they were fighting, at least one, if not both, had to be being evil, that is, doing evil works, or we'd have to admit that they were each fighting the other by the will of GOD.)

We know from this story that babies can fight in the womb, that they therefore know at least some of their future on earth and the status of themselves and others and that they already had chosen to become sinful, ie murder for themselves not trusting in GOD.

We also know that their future life is important to them in the womb and they are emotionally involved with it no matter that we all forget this as we forget most of our earliest years on earth. It also lends support to the interpretation of Ps 51:5... sinful from the time my mother conceived me. as being straight forward truth.

The answer is not found in their innocence but in their election: elect babies go to heaven no matter at what age they die and non-elect babies return to Sheol from whence they came:
Ps 9:17 The wicked shall RETURN to Sheol, all the nations that forget God.

Peace, Ted
PCE Theology as I see it...

We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.

This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.

User avatar
William
Savant
Posts: 15237
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:11 pm
Location: Te Waipounamu
Has thanked: 974 times
Been thanked: 1799 times
Contact:

Post #88

Post by William »

@86


ttruscott: the euphemisms were chosen to purposefully avoid any hint that they were being sinful.

William: Making your job so much harder?
I like my idea of how a just GOD deals with sinful individuals, because it actually allows for true justice to be done.

In that, we should all experience exactly what we believe.

As to 'death' being 'the wages of sin' it is apparent that your own theology has entities being punished for eternity. Thus, these ones are not dead at all. Your theology has it that "the wages of sin is a living hellish torment for eternity."

Not death.

User avatar
ttruscott
Site Supporter
Posts: 11064
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:09 pm
Location: West Coast of Canada
Been thanked: 3 times

Post #89

Post by ttruscott »

William wrote:I like my idea of how a just GOD deals with sinful individuals, because it actually allows for true justice to be done.
You miss the mark:

I believe we all chose by our free will to either 1. abide by the conditions to become elect or 2. to reject those conditions as evil so I find that basing our life of suffering and our life after death on election is the same as basing it upon our own free will decisions - where is there any unfairness in that?
PCE Theology as I see it...

We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.

This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.

User avatar
ttruscott
Site Supporter
Posts: 11064
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:09 pm
Location: West Coast of Canada
Been thanked: 3 times

Post #90

Post by ttruscott »

William wrote:... your own theology has entities being punished for eternity. Thus, these ones are not dead at all. Your theology has it that "the wages of sin is a living hellish torment for eternity."

Not death.[/color]
The meaning of death: death means separation and the consequences of that separation

1. When attributed to a physical body it means that the spirit has left the body and the body is decaying. The spirit is not dead, the body is dead, separated from the spirit.

2. Eternal death, ie, spiritual death, occurs when the spirit is separated from GOD. It is still self aware but it is alone for eternity. That too is called a death as a separation from all of HIS created reality and being banished to past the edge of our physical universe, either dimensionally or physically.

That this feels like a living hellish torment for eternity is a what they chose rather than have to live with HIM as their husband even to the point of rejecting the method of the sinful elect to become elect first then to go their own way safe from hell, but that demeaned the greatness of their commitment to their hatred of HIM.
PCE Theology as I see it...

We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.

This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.

Post Reply