Wootah wrote:
Checkpoint wrote:
Wootah wrote:
Wootah wrote:
[
Replying to post 7 by Elijah John]
'Blessed are the merciful for they shall receive mercy.'
Also
Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
Are you poor in spirit?
Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.
Are you pure in heart?
Be honest

What is your point in asking "Are you....?"
Ej often argues that God is merciful and quotes the verse he does as if that is sufficient to expect salvation. So i went looking at the beatitudes he is quoting from and want to know if he accepts the other verses as well. I suspect not and therefore i am highlighting EJs quote mining.
Why do you suppose that the other Beattitudes would undermine the "Blessed are the merciful" one?
Also, in the future, do you think you could formulate your questions in less personal terms? Without speculation on what I do or do not accept? That would be a bit more civil. Thank you.
Ironic, one of the missions of this OP was to highlight quote mining as practiced by Conventional, Trinitarian and Evangleical Christianity.
Such as ignoring or downplaying Matthew 6.14,(thank you Tam, for that reference), which reads:
For if you forgive others their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you.
That verse and the "blessed are the merciful" beattitude are refutations of your statement from post 3:
if you do not forgive others does not mean that God will forgive you.
.
You acknowledge Matthew 6.15*, but ignore Matthew 6.14 in order to make your point. How is that
not quote mining?
So this reciprocal forgiveness passage does indeed mean that if we forgive others, the Father will forgive us. That is what Jesus taught. Maybe not what Paul taught, but it is certainly what Jesus taught.
----------
*you may or may not acknowledge what the passage plainly states, but I still don't see how you reconcile those verses with Paul's substitutionary blood-atonement theology.
Forgiveness is taught in the SotM passage, but no mention of the need of blood offering in order to do so. Why do you think that is?
Was Jesus leaving it up to Paul to interpret his upcoming crucifixion, or to tie that crucifixion to the forgiveness of sins? Something Jesus, if he ever did so, only did so in passing.