Maunday Thursday

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
rstrats
Scholar
Posts: 436
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 1:37 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Maunday Thursday

Post #1

Post by rstrats »

Does anyone who is familiar with Maundy Thursday, the day during Holy Week which commemorates the washing of the feet and last supper of the Messiah with the apostles know what part of Thursday that this took place - during the night time at the beginning of Thursday, or during the daytime toward the end of Thursday?

rstrats
Scholar
Posts: 436
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 1:37 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: Maunday Thursday

Post #11

Post by rstrats »

JehovahsWitness wrote: Sun Feb 23, 2025 12:05 pm

Sorry I was "dumbing it down" for those that might not understand the Jewish system. Sorry to confuse you.
Still am.

User avatar
JehovahsWitness
Savant
Posts: 22819
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
Has thanked: 892 times
Been thanked: 1330 times
Contact:

Re: Maunday Thursday

Post #12

Post by JehovahsWitness »

rstrats wrote: Sun Feb 23, 2025 12:07 pm
JehovahsWitness wrote: Sun Feb 23, 2025 12:05 pm

Sorry I was "dumbing it down" for those that might not understand the Jewish system. Sorry to confuse you.
Still am.
Probably because you are reading something I didn't write ...

rstrats wrote: Sun Feb 23, 2025 11:33 amFirst you say that Thursday started in the evening ....{snip}
....where did I say the sentence "Thursday started in the evening"?
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681


"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" -
Romans 14:8

rstrats
Scholar
Posts: 436
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 1:37 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: Maunday Thursday

Post #13

Post by rstrats »

JehovahsWitness wrote: Sun Feb 23, 2025 12:05 pm ....where did I say the sentence "Thursday started in the evening"?
Since the OP is about Thursday, when you wrote "For the Jews the day started in the evening." I just assumed that you were referring to Thursday. If you weren't, to what were you referring?

User avatar
JehovahsWitness
Savant
Posts: 22819
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
Has thanked: 892 times
Been thanked: 1330 times
Contact:

Re: Maunday Thursday

Post #14

Post by JehovahsWitness »

rstrats wrote: Sun Feb 23, 2025 12:22 pm
JehovahsWitness wrote: Sun Feb 23, 2025 12:05 pm ....where did I say the sentence "Thursday started in the evening"?
Since the OP is about Thursday, when you wrote "For the Jews the day started in the evening." I just assumed that you were referring to Thursday. If you weren't, to what were you referring?
I was refering to how the Jews counted all their days - ie every day of every month of every year always started at sundown (the evening ).
  • You asked when Jesus washed the Apostles feet and I said probably Thursday in the afternoon.
  • You then asked if the last supper (the evening meal ) would have been "Friday night"? And I said yes (but explaind that we would have called it "Thursday evening" because in modern western societies the day starts at midnight, rather than sunset)
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681


"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" -
Romans 14:8

User avatar
1213
Savant
Posts: 12677
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:06 am
Location: Finland
Has thanked: 433 times
Been thanked: 461 times

Re: Maunday Thursday

Post #15

Post by 1213 »

rstrats wrote: Sun Feb 23, 2025 6:08 am
1213 wrote: Sun Feb 23, 2025 3:37 am
Why do you think it happened on Thursday?
How else can you get at least a portion of three daytimes and at least a portion of three night times in the "heart of the hearth"?
Wouldn't Thursday mean he died on Friday? And if he died on Friday and was risen before Sunday morning, it would mean he was dead only two nights two days?

rstrats
Scholar
Posts: 436
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 1:37 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: Maunday Thursday

Post #16

Post by rstrats »

[quote=1213 post_

Wouldn't Thursday mean he died on Friday? [/quote]

I don't understand what you mean.

And, if he died on Friday and was risen before Sunday morning, it would mean he was dead only two nights two days?
Actually, if He died on Friday and rose Sunday morning, there would have been a portion of a calendar day and a portion of a daytime on Friday. Then a full calendar day, a full night time and a full daytime on Saturday. And finally, at least a portion of a calendar day and at least a portion of a night time and maybe a portion of a daytime on Sunday.

User avatar
1213
Savant
Posts: 12677
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:06 am
Location: Finland
Has thanked: 433 times
Been thanked: 461 times

Re: Maunday Thursday

Post #17

Post by 1213 »

rstrats wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 10:57 am ...
Actually, if He died on Friday and rose Sunday morning, there would have been a portion of a calendar day and a portion of a daytime on Friday. Then a full calendar day, a full night time and a full daytime on Saturday. And finally, at least a portion of a calendar day and at least a portion of a night time and maybe a portion of a daytime on Sunday.
Yes, and i don't think that would be the same as:

For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the whale, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.
Matt. 12:40

I believe the day Jesus died was Wednesday. Thursday was the first Shabbat day of the feast of unleavened day.

On the fifteenth day of the same month is the feast of unleavened bread to Yahweh. Seven days you shall eat unleavened bread. In the first day you shall have a holy convocation. You shall do no regular work. But you shall offer an offering made by fire to Yahweh seven days. In the seventh day is a holy convocation: you shall do no regular work.'"
Lev. 23:6-8

This means the meal was when the Wednesday begun about at 21:00 Tuesday evening.

By this way Jesus was in death 3 days and nights and rose from the tomb Saturday evening.

This makes it also possible for the women to prepare the herbs, because Friday would have been non Shabbat day, and they would have been allowed to do it.

User avatar
JehovahsWitness
Savant
Posts: 22819
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
Has thanked: 892 times
Been thanked: 1330 times
Contact:

Re: Maunday Thursday

Post #18

Post by JehovahsWitness »

1213 wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 10:50 pm
rstrats wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2025 10:57 am ...
Actually, if He died on Friday and rose Sunday morning, there would have been a portion of a calendar day and a portion of a daytime on Friday. Then a full calendar day, a full night time and a full daytime on Saturday. And finally, at least a portion of a calendar day and at least a portion of a night time and maybe a portion of a daytime on Sunday.
Yes, and i don't think that would be the same as:

For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the whale, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.
Matt. 12:40


You have misunderstood what Jesus was saying because you are counting 72 hours (Jesus never mentioned the number 72) Since Jesus never mentioned the number of hours nor the number 72 there is no reason to be dogmatic about it .
The only way to properly understand Jesus words is to count "days and nights" as Jesus (a Jew) would have.
Further , Jesus could not have died on a Wednesday because 1 Cor 15v4 says he was raised in the THIRD day. The 3rd day after Wednesday would have been the weekly Sabbath (Friday).

JW
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681


"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" -
Romans 14:8

User avatar
1213
Savant
Posts: 12677
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:06 am
Location: Finland
Has thanked: 433 times
Been thanked: 461 times

Re: Maunday Thursday

Post #19

Post by 1213 »

JehovahsWitness wrote: Tue Feb 25, 2025 6:57 am You have misunderstood what Jesus was saying because you are counting 72 hours (Jesus never mentioned the number 72) Since Jesus never mentioned the number of hours nor the number 72 there is no reason to be dogmatic about it .
He also doesn't say 3+3 is not not 72 hours. I believe Jesus meant 72 hours and therefore I believe it was Wednesday to Saturday. But, I think it is not necessary wrong to think it was Thursday to Saturday.
JehovahsWitness wrote: Tue Feb 25, 2025 6:57 amThe 3rd day after Wednesday would have been the weekly Sabbath (Friday).
Why do you call Friday weekly Sabbath?

User avatar
JehovahsWitness
Savant
Posts: 22819
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
Has thanked: 892 times
Been thanked: 1330 times
Contact:

Re: Maunday Thursday

Post #20

Post by JehovahsWitness »

1213 wrote: Tue Feb 25, 2025 11:17 pm He also doesn't say 3+3 is not not 72 hours.
There is no point in analysing what the bible does NOT say, we have to concentrate on what the bible DOES say. Your insisting on the hours is distracting you from accepting explicit statements made in scripture ...
1 CORINTHIANS 15 v 3b, 4

... Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures; and that he was buried, yes, that he was raised up on the third day+


Image
The point is that there is no way for Jesus to be resurrected on the "third day" and be dead 72 hours. Since 72 is not mentioned in scripture but THIRD DAY *is* we have to concluded that 72 hours is erroneous
FURTHER READING The Bible speaks of Jesus’ being in the tomb for “three days and three nights.” Does that mean that he was in the tomb for a full seventy-two hours?
https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1973926
Last edited by JehovahsWitness on Wed Feb 26, 2025 10:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681


"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" -
Romans 14:8

Post Reply