Gods name

[kjw47]

Every bible scholar on earth knows 100% that God put his name --( YHVH(Jehovah) = the tetragramoton) in his bible in over 7000 spots because God wants it there. Thus wicked men by satans will removed Gods name to mislead and replaced it in OT( nearly 6800 spots) with GOD or LORD all capitols--quoted in NT over 200 spots where God willed his name.
Now in light of Jesus, who at the Lords prayer has clearly shown to all that his Fathers name( YHVH(Jehovah) is the #1 most important thing, followed by his Fathers kingdom and will. Thus to a true follower Gods name is #1 most important issue.
So then one must ask why is my religion using altered translations in support of satans will over Gods will on the matter of his name belonging in his bible? Would you say to mislead is the answer? Yes it is.
Here is a prime example of the misleading that it does
Joel 2:21-22--Whoever calls on the name of YHVH(Jehovah) will be saved---quoted 2 x in the NT at Acts 2:21-22--Romans 10:13--But since satan willed translations have LORD at Joel, Lord is at both spots of NT, and all who know Jesus is Lord will call on his name in error because they are being mislead. God is not called LORD in the OT by his will, his name belongs there. it is causing major confusion.
The New world translation corrected that matter, yet every religion using the altered translations condemned the NWT. Why because with that name back in it exposes all of those ones using the altered translations as false religion.
The sad fact is that they know Gods name belongs in all of those spots. So what are you going to do about being mislead?

[Capbook]

Gods name So what are you going to do about being mislead?

Matthew 28:19
Go ye therefore,
and teach all nations,
baptizing them in the name of the Father,
and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:

What is the name of the Father,
and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost?

Is Jesus Christ, the name of the Father,
and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost?

If not then what is it?

The name of God is JEHOVAH. (See Psalm 83:18, KJV) "That men may know that thou, whose name alone is JEHOVAH, art the most high over all the earth." The name of Jesus is Jesus, though in Hebrew it's something else, but we have no trouble saying Jesus' name. The Holy Ghost has no name because it is a force with which God does what He wants to do.

If the Holy Spirit a force why He is included in the singular "name" and the same definite article used with the Father and Son?
Can a force be a Comforter? Intercessor or Advocate? (John 14:16)

There is no "singular name" which includes the force that is the Holy Spirit. The Father can be named and the Son can be named, but the Holy Spirit has no personal name. It's because it isn't a Person. I don't know what you mean by the Holy Spirit having "the same definite article." Please explain. Of course Jehovah uses His Holy Spirit to Comfort and Intercede and Advocate. That is what He uses His Spirit to do, among other things. That happens without the Spirit being a Person.

The definite article (the) is used before a noun to indicate that the identity of the noun is known.
The union of these three names in the form of baptism proves that the Son and Holy Spirit are equal with the Father. Nothing would be more absurd or blasphemous than to unite the name of a man or a force with the name of the ever-living God in this solemn rite.

Mat 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
KJV

That doesn't show in any way that the three are equal. It just mentions three individual entities, and nothing about the relationship among the three except the Son, of course, would be subservient to his Father who gave him life. The Holy Spirit is just the Holy Spirit. It doesn't make it equal to any of the other two.

Is baptism not a solemn rite you?

Would it be not more absurd or blasphemous than to unite the name of a man or a force with the name of the ever-living God in this solemn rite?

[JehovahsWitness]

Yes, Vine's define "name" as it implies, of authority of, character, rank, majesty, power, excellence, etc,.

1. All authority etc is not equal. A mother has authority over her children but that her authority is not equal to the King of England's.
2. Not all that has authority is a person. The bible is authoritative in this subforum, but the bible is not a person.
3. Mentioning three entities or persons or a mixture of both in the same context does not necessarily imply equality and certainly does not impose them all being the same single entity (are John, Paul, George and Ringo all ...Ringo?)

[onewithhim]

Gods name So what are you going to do about being mislead?

Matthew 28:19
Go ye therefore,
and teach all nations,
baptizing them in the name of the Father,
and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:

What is the name of the Father,
and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost?

Is Jesus Christ, the name of the Father,
and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost?

If not then what is it?

The name of God is JEHOVAH. (See Psalm 83:18, KJV) "That men may know that thou, whose name alone is JEHOVAH, art the most high over all the earth." The name of Jesus is Jesus, though in Hebrew it's something else, but we have no trouble saying Jesus' name. The Holy Ghost has no name because it is a force with which God does what He wants to do.

If the Holy Spirit a force why He is included in the singular "name" and the same definite article used with the Father and Son?
Can a force be a Comforter? Intercessor or Advocate? (John 14:16)

There is no "singular name" which includes the force that is the Holy Spirit. The Father can be named and the Son can be named, but the Holy Spirit has no personal name. It's because it isn't a Person. I don't know what you mean by the Holy Spirit having "the same definite article." Please explain. Of course Jehovah uses His Holy Spirit to Comfort and Intercede and Advocate. That is what He uses His Spirit to do, among other things. That happens without the Spirit being a Person.

The definite article (the) is used before a noun to indicate that the identity of the noun is known.
The union of these three names in the form of baptism proves that the Son and Holy Spirit are equal with the Father. Nothing would be more absurd or blasphemous than to unite the name of a man or a force with the name of the ever-living God in this solemn rite.

Mat 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
KJV

That doesn't show in any way that the three are equal. It just mentions three individual entities, and nothing about the relationship among the three except the Son, of course, would be subservient to his Father who gave him life. The Holy Spirit is just the Holy Spirit. It doesn't make it equal to any of the other two.

Is baptism not a solemn rite you?

Would it be not more absurd or blasphemous than to unite the name of a man or a force with the name of the ever-living God in this solemn rite?

Maybe so. Aren't you doing just that?

[Capbook]

Gods name So what are you going to do about being mislead?

Matthew 28:19
Go ye therefore,
and teach all nations,
baptizing them in the name of the Father,
and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:

What is the name of the Father,
and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost?

Is Jesus Christ, the name of the Father,
and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost?

If not then what is it?

The name of God is JEHOVAH. (See Psalm 83:18, KJV) "That men may know that thou, whose name alone is JEHOVAH, art the most high over all the earth." The name of Jesus is Jesus, though in Hebrew it's something else, but we have no trouble saying Jesus' name. The Holy Ghost has no name because it is a force with which God does what He wants to do.

If the Holy Spirit a force why He is included in the singular "name" and the same definite article used with the Father and Son?
Can a force be a Comforter? Intercessor or Advocate? (John 14:16)

There is no "singular name" which includes the force that is the Holy Spirit. The Father can be named and the Son can be named, but the Holy Spirit has no personal name. It's because it isn't a Person. I don't know what you mean by the Holy Spirit having "the same definite article." Please explain. Of course Jehovah uses His Holy Spirit to Comfort and Intercede and Advocate. That is what He uses His Spirit to do, among other things. That happens without the Spirit being a Person.

The definite article (the) is used before a noun to indicate that the identity of the noun is known.
The union of these three names in the form of baptism proves that the Son and Holy Spirit are equal with the Father. Nothing would be more absurd or blasphemous than to unite the name of a man or a force with the name of the ever-living God in this solemn rite.

Mat 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
KJV

That doesn't show in any way that the three are equal. It just mentions three individual entities, and nothing about the relationship among the three except the Son, of course, would be subservient to his Father who gave him life. The Holy Spirit is just the Holy Spirit. It doesn't make it equal to any of the other two.

Is baptism not a solemn rite you?

Would it be not more absurd or blasphemous than to unite the name of a man or a force with the name of the ever-living God in this solemn rite?

Maybe so. Aren't you doing just that?

Yes, I was baptized in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Are you not?

[onewithhim]

Gods name So what are you going to do about being mislead?

Matthew 28:19
Go ye therefore,
and teach all nations,
baptizing them in the name of the Father,
and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:

What is the name of the Father,
and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost?

Is Jesus Christ, the name of the Father,
and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost?

If not then what is it?

The name of God is JEHOVAH. (See Psalm 83:18, KJV) "That men may know that thou, whose name alone is JEHOVAH, art the most high over all the earth." The name of Jesus is Jesus, though in Hebrew it's something else, but we have no trouble saying Jesus' name. The Holy Ghost has no name because it is a force with which God does what He wants to do.

If the Holy Spirit a force why He is included in the singular "name" and the same definite article used with the Father and Son?
Can a force be a Comforter? Intercessor or Advocate? (John 14:16)

There is no "singular name" which includes the force that is the Holy Spirit. The Father can be named and the Son can be named, but the Holy Spirit has no personal name. It's because it isn't a Person. I don't know what you mean by the Holy Spirit having "the same definite article." Please explain. Of course Jehovah uses His Holy Spirit to Comfort and Intercede and Advocate. That is what He uses His Spirit to do, among other things. That happens without the Spirit being a Person.

The definite article (the) is used before a noun to indicate that the identity of the noun is known.
The union of these three names in the form of baptism proves that the Son and Holy Spirit are equal with the Father. Nothing would be more absurd or blasphemous than to unite the name of a man or a force with the name of the ever-living God in this solemn rite.

Mat 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
KJV

That doesn't show in any way that the three are equal. It just mentions three individual entities, and nothing about the relationship among the three except the Son, of course, would be subservient to his Father who gave him life. The Holy Spirit is just the Holy Spirit. It doesn't make it equal to any of the other two.

Is baptism not a solemn rite you?

Would it be not more absurd or blasphemous than to unite the name of a man or a force with the name of the ever-living God in this solemn rite?

Maybe so. Aren't you doing just that?

Yes, I was baptized in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Are you not?

You are being blasphemous, unfortunately, by not attributing to the Father full Godhood and saying that God is a trinity. If He is not a trinity you are on slippery ground. I was baptized with the authority of the Father, which He also gave to Christ, and the Force of the Holy Spirit.

[Capbook]

Matthew 28:19
Go ye therefore,
and teach all nations,
baptizing them in the name of the Father,
and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:

What is the name of the Father,
and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost?

Is Jesus Christ, the name of the Father,
and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost?

If not then what is it?

The name of God is JEHOVAH. (See Psalm 83:18, KJV) "That men may know that thou, whose name alone is JEHOVAH, art the most high over all the earth." The name of Jesus is Jesus, though in Hebrew it's something else, but we have no trouble saying Jesus' name. The Holy Ghost has no name because it is a force with which God does what He wants to do.

If the Holy Spirit a force why He is included in the singular "name" and the same definite article used with the Father and Son?
Can a force be a Comforter? Intercessor or Advocate? (John 14:16)

There is no "singular name" which includes the force that is the Holy Spirit. The Father can be named and the Son can be named, but the Holy Spirit has no personal name. It's because it isn't a Person. I don't know what you mean by the Holy Spirit having "the same definite article." Please explain. Of course Jehovah uses His Holy Spirit to Comfort and Intercede and Advocate. That is what He uses His Spirit to do, among other things. That happens without the Spirit being a Person.

The definite article (the) is used before a noun to indicate that the identity of the noun is known.
The union of these three names in the form of baptism proves that the Son and Holy Spirit are equal with the Father. Nothing would be more absurd or blasphemous than to unite the name of a man or a force with the name of the ever-living God in this solemn rite.

Mat 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
KJV

That doesn't show in any way that the three are equal. It just mentions three individual entities, and nothing about the relationship among the three except the Son, of course, would be subservient to his Father who gave him life. The Holy Spirit is just the Holy Spirit. It doesn't make it equal to any of the other two.

Is baptism not a solemn rite you?

Would it be not more absurd or blasphemous than to unite the name of a man or a force with the name of the ever-living God in this solemn rite?

Maybe so. Aren't you doing just that?

Yes, I was baptized in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Are you not?

You are being blasphemous, unfortunately, by not attributing to the Father full Godhood and saying that God is a trinity. If He is not a trinity you are on slippery ground. I was baptized with the authority of the Father, which He also gave to Christ, and the Force of the Holy Spirit.

I believe you have the same faith with JW, and JW accepts that Jesus is God. Why you are not?

[JehovahsWitness]

... JW accepts that Jesus is God. Why you are not?

Jesus is God, he is just not ALMIGHTY God. Being a God doesnt make you equal in power, age or authority with the supreme God YHWH (Jehovah the Most High), it just makes you "a god" (one of many).

[onewithhim]

The name of God is JEHOVAH. (See Psalm 83:18, KJV) "That men may know that thou, whose name alone is JEHOVAH, art the most high over all the earth." The name of Jesus is Jesus, though in Hebrew it's something else, but we have no trouble saying Jesus' name. The Holy Ghost has no name because it is a force with which God does what He wants to do.

If the Holy Spirit a force why He is included in the singular "name" and the same definite article used with the Father and Son?
Can a force be a Comforter? Intercessor or Advocate? (John 14:16)

There is no "singular name" which includes the force that is the Holy Spirit. The Father can be named and the Son can be named, but the Holy Spirit has no personal name. It's because it isn't a Person. I don't know what you mean by the Holy Spirit having "the same definite article." Please explain. Of course Jehovah uses His Holy Spirit to Comfort and Intercede and Advocate. That is what He uses His Spirit to do, among other things. That happens without the Spirit being a Person.

The definite article (the) is used before a noun to indicate that the identity of the noun is known.
The union of these three names in the form of baptism proves that the Son and Holy Spirit are equal with the Father. Nothing would be more absurd or blasphemous than to unite the name of a man or a force with the name of the ever-living God in this solemn rite.

Mat 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
KJV

That doesn't show in any way that the three are equal. It just mentions three individual entities, and nothing about the relationship among the three except the Son, of course, would be subservient to his Father who gave him life. The Holy Spirit is just the Holy Spirit. It doesn't make it equal to any of the other two.

Is baptism not a solemn rite you?

Would it be not more absurd or blasphemous than to unite the name of a man or a force with the name of the ever-living God in this solemn rite?

Maybe so. Aren't you doing just that?

Yes, I was baptized in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Are you not?

You are being blasphemous, unfortunately, by not attributing to the Father full Godhood and saying that God is a trinity. If He is not a trinity you are on slippery ground. I was baptized with the authority of the Father, which He also gave to Christ, and the Force of the Holy Spirit.

I believe you have the same faith with JW, and JW accepts that Jesus is God. Why you are not?

JW does not believe that Jesus is God. If JW did, they would not be a JW anymore. If you look at their post you will see that they said that Jesus is a god, not God Almighty, but one of many.

[Capbook]

If the Holy Spirit a force why He is included in the singular "name" and the same definite article used with the Father and Son?
Can a force be a Comforter? Intercessor or Advocate? (John 14:16)

There is no "singular name" which includes the force that is the Holy Spirit. The Father can be named and the Son can be named, but the Holy Spirit has no personal name. It's because it isn't a Person. I don't know what you mean by the Holy Spirit having "the same definite article." Please explain. Of course Jehovah uses His Holy Spirit to Comfort and Intercede and Advocate. That is what He uses His Spirit to do, among other things. That happens without the Spirit being a Person.

The definite article (the) is used before a noun to indicate that the identity of the noun is known.
The union of these three names in the form of baptism proves that the Son and Holy Spirit are equal with the Father. Nothing would be more absurd or blasphemous than to unite the name of a man or a force with the name of the ever-living God in this solemn rite.

Mat 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
KJV

That doesn't show in any way that the three are equal. It just mentions three individual entities, and nothing about the relationship among the three except the Son, of course, would be subservient to his Father who gave him life. The Holy Spirit is just the Holy Spirit. It doesn't make it equal to any of the other two.

Is baptism not a solemn rite you?

Would it be not more absurd or blasphemous than to unite the name of a man or a force with the name of the ever-living God in this solemn rite?

Maybe so. Aren't you doing just that?

Yes, I was baptized in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Are you not?

You are being blasphemous, unfortunately, by not attributing to the Father full Godhood and saying that God is a trinity. If He is not a trinity you are on slippery ground. I was baptized with the authority of the Father, which He also gave to Christ, and the Force of the Holy Spirit.

I believe you have the same faith with JW, and JW accepts that Jesus is God. Why you are not?

JW does not believe that Jesus is God. If JW did, they would not be a JW anymore. If you look at their post you will see that they said that Jesus is a god, not God Almighty, but one of many.

Didn't you see JW Post#77? Jesus is God. Uppercase G. You presume now that JW is not JW anymore?

[onewithhim]

There is no "singular name" which includes the force that is the Holy Spirit. The Father can be named and the Son can be named, but the Holy Spirit has no personal name. It's because it isn't a Person. I don't know what you mean by the Holy Spirit having "the same definite article." Please explain. Of course Jehovah uses His Holy Spirit to Comfort and Intercede and Advocate. That is what He uses His Spirit to do, among other things. That happens without the Spirit being a Person.

The definite article (the) is used before a noun to indicate that the identity of the noun is known.
The union of these three names in the form of baptism proves that the Son and Holy Spirit are equal with the Father. Nothing would be more absurd or blasphemous than to unite the name of a man or a force with the name of the ever-living God in this solemn rite.

Mat 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
KJV

That doesn't show in any way that the three are equal. It just mentions three individual entities, and nothing about the relationship among the three except the Son, of course, would be subservient to his Father who gave him life. The Holy Spirit is just the Holy Spirit. It doesn't make it equal to any of the other two.

Is baptism not a solemn rite you?

Would it be not more absurd or blasphemous than to unite the name of a man or a force with the name of the ever-living God in this solemn rite?

Maybe so. Aren't you doing just that?

Yes, I was baptized in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Are you not?

You are being blasphemous, unfortunately, by not attributing to the Father full Godhood and saying that God is a trinity. If He is not a trinity you are on slippery ground. I was baptized with the authority of the Father, which He also gave to Christ, and the Force of the Holy Spirit.

I believe you have the same faith with JW, and JW accepts that Jesus is God. Why you are not?

JW does not believe that Jesus is God. If JW did, they would not be a JW anymore. If you look at their post you will see that they said that Jesus is a god, not God Almighty, but one of many.

Didn't you see JW Post#77? Jesus is God. Uppercase G. You presume now that JW is not JW anymore?

They do not believe that Jesus is God Almighty. Don't you see what they meant? Jesus is a god like many other honored and revered persons in high positions. The uppercase "G" doesn't mean anything in their post.