[
Replying to William in post #9]
What you think about what you think I am doing is not a relevant form of debate.
What I said wasn't up for debate. I've provided everything yet you continued to seem to want to argue about it. I simply called it like I saw it with zero need to debate that. Is it not possible to have a conversation without debating? I would like to think so.
Because I would like you to give us some example[s] of the difference between government created CT and religious created CT [re "theories in question".] that we might better understand your argument.
I don't believe the government 'creates' these theories as much as people do, just like I'm not sure God creates them as much as his followers may. But that's JMO, nothing that can be pointed to as proof.
Basically, I don't know of any religious conspiracy theories r(ight off), though I seem to remember hearing about them in the past. Obviously they weren't of interest to me or I would have remembered them.
Being as the government and religion are so much alike (leaders appointed/voted upon, people in power controlling lives of others, influence, money, greed, et al) I suspect any conspiracy theories would be similar as well. But I'm not a religious conspiracy theorist.