In another thread I was talking about sexual urges and how our inherent human nature kicks in when it comes to sex. Automatically the Christian I was debating with assumed I was talking about some form of infidelity and that infidelity had serious consequences. I agreed. However fornication is far more than just adultry. Fornication includes any type of pre-marital sex too.
So if two consenting, SINGLE adults decide ot have premarital sex and they use protection, what really is the problem with it? Why is it so wrong and what are the ramifications. And please don't bother with the answer "Because God says it's wrong". Let's try to apply some reasoning and logic to this.
Why is it so sinful?
What are the ramifications of doing it?
If there are ramifications just how serious are they and how likely are they to occur?
Fornication. What really is the problem with it?
Moderator: Moderators
- OnceConvinced
- Savant
- Posts: 8969
- Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:22 pm
- Location: New Zealand
- Has thanked: 50 times
- Been thanked: 67 times
- Contact:
Fornication. What really is the problem with it?
Post #1Society and its morals evolve and will continue to evolve. The bible however remains the same and just requires more and more apologetics and claims of "metaphors" and "symbolism" to justify it.
Prayer is like rubbing an old bottle and hoping that a genie will pop out and grant you three wishes.
There is much about this world that is mind boggling and impressive, but I see no need whatsoever to put it down to magical super powered beings.
Check out my website: Recker's World
- Goat
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24999
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Post #11
And how is that a valid analogy?Defender of Truth wrote:Why would you say cheating on a test is wrong?Why is it so sinful?
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�
Steven Novella
Steven Novella
- Defender of Truth
- Scholar
- Posts: 441
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:07 pm
- Location: United States
Post #12
The validity of the analogical illustration lies within the fact that cheating on a test is considered "wrong". Fornication is also considered "wrong". I'm asking what makes cheating on a test "wrong", and seeing whether the same test applies to whether or not "fornication" is wrong.And how is that a valid analogy?
Christian's would say that cheating on a test is wrong because God said so. They would then compare fornication to the same standard as cheating on a test (God) and then conclude that fornication is wrong as well.
I'm asking for the evidence he has the cheating on a test is wrong, and then according to his logic we can see whether fornication is wrong.
- Goat
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24999
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Post #13
Can you give me evidence that 'God Said so' aside from self promoting religious texts?Defender of Truth wrote:The validity of the analogical illustration lies within the fact that cheating on a test is considered "wrong". Fornication is also considered "wrong". I'm asking what makes cheating on a test "wrong", and seeing whether the same test applies to whether or not "fornication" is wrong.And how is that a valid analogy?
Christian's would say that cheating on a test is wrong because God said so. They would then compare fornication to the same standard as cheating on a test (God) and then conclude that fornication is wrong as well.
I'm asking for the evidence he has the cheating on a test is wrong, and then according to his logic we can see whether fornication is wrong.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�
Steven Novella
Steven Novella
- McCulloch
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24063
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
- Location: Toronto, ON, CA
- Been thanked: 3 times
Post #14
Really? Where is it that God says that cheating on a test is wrong? I suppose, let your yes be yes and your no be no, but that is in context of oaths. Bearing false witness?Defender of Truth wrote:Christian's would say that cheating on a test is wrong because God said so. They would then compare fornication to the same standard as cheating on a test (God) and then conclude that fornication is wrong as well.
Cheating on a test is wrong because if cheating were allowed, it would defeat the purpose of the test, being to honestly determine whether the subject knew the material. If there are consequences of the test, then cheating on the test may also violate the principle of fairness.Defender of Truth wrote:I'm asking for the evidence he has the cheating on a test is wrong, and then according to his logic we can see whether fornication is wrong.
Now, let's apply the principle to fornication. Does fornication defeat the purpose of sex? Yes, if you assume that sex is only for procreation. Does fornication violate the principle of fairness?
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
- Defender of Truth
- Scholar
- Posts: 441
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:07 pm
- Location: United States
Post #15
I never said anything about God. I asked why cheating was wrong and you haven't given me an answer yet.goat wrote:Can you give me evidence that 'God Said so' aside from self promoting religious texts?
- Goat
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24999
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Post #16
You mean you forgot this quoteDefender of Truth wrote:I never said anything about God. I asked why cheating was wrong and you haven't given me an answer yet.goat wrote:Can you give me evidence that 'God Said so' aside from self promoting religious texts?
[quote='Defender of Truth"]
Christian's would say that cheating on a test is wrong because God said so. They would then compare fornication to the same standard as cheating on a test (God) and then conclude that fornication is wrong as well.
[/quote]
I would say, yes you did mention God.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�
Steven Novella
Steven Novella
- Defender of Truth
- Scholar
- Posts: 441
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:07 pm
- Location: United States
Post #17
A Christian answer to Cheating: Cheating is the act or practice of dishonesty. It is the willful disregard of the law or rules, stated or morally determined, for one's personal gain or advancement. The new Webster's dictionary states, "one cheats by direct and gross falsehood." Also, a cheat is a deceiver, a swindler. Cheating involves stealing (improperly and dishonestly obtaining that which is not one's own) and is, therefore, in complete opposition to God's biblical standards of truth and personal behavior. Simply stated, cheating is sin.Where is it that God says that cheating on a test is wrong?
Key verses: "You shall not steal, nor deal falsely, nor lie to one another."
"You shall not defraud your neighbor, nor rob him"
"You shall do not injustice in judgement, in measurement of length, weight, or volume."
"You shall have just balances, just weights..."
"A false balance is an abomination to the Lord, but a just weight is His delight."
"Lying lips are an abomination to the LORD, but those who deal truthfully are His delight."
Uh... Cheating's wrong because it violates the principle of fairness?Cheating on a test is wrong because if cheating were allowed, it would defeat the purpose of the test, being to honestly determine whether the subject knew the material. If there are consequences of the test, then cheating on the test may also violate the principle of fairness.
Fairness is
So basically you're saying cheating's wrong because it's dishonest and unjust. Okay... Well, unjust is the opposite of just which means, according to the dictionarydictionary wrote:free from bias, dishonesty, or injustice
guided by truth, reason, justice, and fairness
So, using the Reflexive property of equality we could say "Cheating is wrong because it's unfair". Well what's wrong with being unfair? Unfairness is unjust! Well what's wrong with injustice? It's not fair!
I don't accept "Begging the question" as a legitimate reason for cheating being wrong.
A principle is a
Are you saying there's a fundamental truth of morality to which we must adapt? You're saying I need to be honest? What if I don't want to?Dictionary wrote: fundamental, primary, or general law or truth from which others are derived
I mentioned it inasmuch as you mentioned it. I simply stated that it's what Christian's say. I'm not discussing whether Christian's, or my views are correct, I'm discussing whether or not Fornication is wrong according to the original poster's comment.goat wrote:You mean you forgot this quote
Defender of Truth wrote:
Christian's would say that cheating on a test is wrong because God said so. They would then compare fornication to the same standard as cheating on a test (God) and then conclude that fornication is wrong as well.
I would say, yes you did mention God.
- Goat
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24999
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Post #18
I challenge you to point to the post on this thread that I mention god before you did.Defender of Truth wrote:
I mentioned it inasmuch as you mentioned it. I simply stated that it's what Christian's say. I'm not discussing whether Christian's, or my views are correct, I'm discussing whether or not Fornication is wrong according to the original poster's comment.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�
Steven Novella
Steven Novella
- Defender of Truth
- Scholar
- Posts: 441
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:07 pm
- Location: United States
Post #19
I'm sorry, but I'm going to decline the challenge because it is totally irrelevant to the discussion. No one ever claimed that you mentioned God before I did. Let's look at what was said.goat wrote:I challenge you to point to the post on this thread that I mention god before you did.
The usage of the "in as much" contraction means "in like manner", or "in the same way". It does not mean "after". When I mentioned God I was (1) replying to McCulloch's post, and before that (2) verifying the legitimacy of my analogy by using the example of God. Therefore, neither of us used the word "God" in the context of it being the standard of morality. Of course you know I believe this from other topics, but I never mentioned that here.Defender of Truth wrote:I mentioned it inasmuch as you mentioned it.
I never said I supported the view. Therefore you asking me to give evidence for it is the same as me asking you for evidence of it.
- OnceConvinced
- Savant
- Posts: 8969
- Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:22 pm
- Location: New Zealand
- Has thanked: 50 times
- Been thanked: 67 times
- Contact:
Re: Fornication. What really is the problem with it?
Post #20Never heard of her. But I did look it up on Wikipedia. I don't see your point though.goat wrote:One name
Bristol Palin
Society and its morals evolve and will continue to evolve. The bible however remains the same and just requires more and more apologetics and claims of "metaphors" and "symbolism" to justify it.
Prayer is like rubbing an old bottle and hoping that a genie will pop out and grant you three wishes.
There is much about this world that is mind boggling and impressive, but I see no need whatsoever to put it down to magical super powered beings.
Check out my website: Recker's World