In another thread I was talking about sexual urges and how our inherent human nature kicks in when it comes to sex. Automatically the Christian I was debating with assumed I was talking about some form of infidelity and that infidelity had serious consequences. I agreed. However fornication is far more than just adultry. Fornication includes any type of pre-marital sex too.
So if two consenting, SINGLE adults decide ot have premarital sex and they use protection, what really is the problem with it? Why is it so wrong and what are the ramifications. And please don't bother with the answer "Because God says it's wrong". Let's try to apply some reasoning and logic to this.
Why is it so sinful?
What are the ramifications of doing it?
If there are ramifications just how serious are they and how likely are they to occur?
Fornication. What really is the problem with it?
Moderator: Moderators
- OnceConvinced
- Savant
- Posts: 8969
- Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:22 pm
- Location: New Zealand
- Has thanked: 50 times
- Been thanked: 67 times
- Contact:
Fornication. What really is the problem with it?
Post #1Society and its morals evolve and will continue to evolve. The bible however remains the same and just requires more and more apologetics and claims of "metaphors" and "symbolism" to justify it.
Prayer is like rubbing an old bottle and hoping that a genie will pop out and grant you three wishes.
There is much about this world that is mind boggling and impressive, but I see no need whatsoever to put it down to magical super powered beings.
Check out my website: Recker's World
- Goat
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24999
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Re: Fornication. What really is the problem with it?
Post #2Birth control is not 100% effective, and the ramifications might be an unwanted pregnancy. that is assuming that both partners are disease free and monogamousOnceConvinced wrote:In another thread I was talking about sexual urges and how our inherent human nature kicks in when it comes to sex. Automatically the Christian I was debating with assumed I was talking about some form of infidelity and that infidelity had serious consequences. I agreed. However fornication is far more than just adultry. Fornication includes any type of pre-marital sex too.
So if two consenting, SINGLE adults decide ot have premarital sex and they use protection, what really is the problem with it? Why is it so wrong and what are the ramifications. And please don't bother with the answer "Because God says it's wrong". Let's try to apply some reasoning and logic to this.
Why is it so sinful?
What are the ramifications of doing it?
If there are ramifications just how serious are they and how likely are they to occur?
with each other.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�
Steven Novella
Steven Novella
- OnceConvinced
- Savant
- Posts: 8969
- Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:22 pm
- Location: New Zealand
- Has thanked: 50 times
- Been thanked: 67 times
- Contact:
Re: Fornication. What really is the problem with it?
Post #3Is that a good reason to forbid pre-martial sex? If we are going to outlaw pre-marital sex because of the the minute chance of unwanted pregnancies we should also out law driving, or flying by plane in case we end up in an accident (or in biblical times quit riding donkeys in case we fall off and injure ourselves). We could start putting a stop to almost everything we do in case of something unfortunate happening. To me that doesn't quite add up to a sensible reason to forbid sex before marriage. I guess one could argue there was no such thing as condoms in biblical times, so that ruling was necessary. But is it still necessary now?goat wrote:
Birth control is not 100% effective, and the ramifications might be an unwanted pregnancy. that is assuming that both partners are disease free and monogamous
with each other.
The other thing is, and I'm not sure if it's a Christian thing or a Jewish thing. I suspect it's Christian... is that pregnancies are a blessing from God. Therefore it should be fine if a pregnancy occurs. It would be God's will and his blessing.
It's funny my ex wife got pregnant to her boyfriend. They weren't married. She actually made the claim that God had blessed her with a child. Wha???? She, an adultress and fornicator, yet believes God would bless her with a child?
Society and its morals evolve and will continue to evolve. The bible however remains the same and just requires more and more apologetics and claims of "metaphors" and "symbolism" to justify it.
Prayer is like rubbing an old bottle and hoping that a genie will pop out and grant you three wishes.
There is much about this world that is mind boggling and impressive, but I see no need whatsoever to put it down to magical super powered beings.
Check out my website: Recker's World
- Goat
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24999
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Re: Fornication. What really is the problem with it?
Post #4One nameOnceConvinced wrote:Is that a good reason to forbid pre-martial sex? If we are going to outlaw pre-marital sex because of the the minute chance of unwanted pregnancies we should also out law driving, or flying by plane in case we end up in an accident (or in biblical times quit riding donkeys in case we fall off and injure ourselves). We could start putting a stop to almost everything we do in case of something unfortunate happening. To me that doesn't quite add up to a sensible reason to forbid sex before marriage. I guess one could argue there was no such thing as condoms in biblical times, so that ruling was necessary. But is it still necessary now?goat wrote:
Birth control is not 100% effective, and the ramifications might be an unwanted pregnancy. that is assuming that both partners are disease free and monogamous
with each other.
The other thing is, and I'm not sure if it's a Christian thing or a Jewish thing. I suspect it's Christian... is that pregnancies are a blessing from God. Therefore it should be fine if a pregnancy occurs. It would be God's will and his blessing.
It's funny my ex wife got pregnant to her boyfriend. They weren't married. She actually made the claim that God had blessed her with a child. Wha???? She, an adultress and fornicator, yet believes God would bless her with a child?
Bristol Palin
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�
Steven Novella
Steven Novella
Post #5
It's funny, in Asatru (Filthy, vile, heathens that we are) it is considered by some to be law that a child must be had before a marriage can take place.
That's how my wife and I did it. An unwanted, unplanned, unexpected pregnancy brought me the three greatest things ever (Daughter, son, wife).
That's how my wife and I did it. An unwanted, unplanned, unexpected pregnancy brought me the three greatest things ever (Daughter, son, wife).
- JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2573 times
Post #6
I hear ya. My son was born 7 months premature. Think about it.Coyotero wrote:It's funny, in Asatru (Filthy, vile, heathens that we are) it is considered by some to be law that a child must be had before a marriage can take place.
That's how my wife and I did it. An unwanted, unplanned, unexpected pregnancy brought me the three greatest things ever (Daughter, son, wife).
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin
-Punkinhead Martin
- McCulloch
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24063
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
- Location: Toronto, ON, CA
- Been thanked: 3 times
Post #7
There is a delightful now obsolete English word, merry-begotten, which meant a child conceived before but born after the wedding of his or her parents. It seems to avoid the negative connotations of bastard.
Someone I am related to on my wife's side was having difficulty obtaining her father's consent to marry her beloved. He was a foreigner and her father was a bigot. They overcame his objections by deliberately becoming pregnant. They both were and still are active in their Southern Baptist church. They are still happily married, and grandparents. Did they do wrong?
Someone I am related to on my wife's side was having difficulty obtaining her father's consent to marry her beloved. He was a foreigner and her father was a bigot. They overcame his objections by deliberately becoming pregnant. They both were and still are active in their Southern Baptist church. They are still happily married, and grandparents. Did they do wrong?
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
- Goat
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24999
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Post #8
IMO, no. It's when there is unintended consequences where the people involved are unwilling or unable to take care of the child that is wrong. The act itself is not wrong. It is not willing to act responsible for the consequences that is.McCulloch wrote:There is a delightful now obsolete English word, merry-begotten, which meant a child conceived before but born after the wedding of his or her parents. It seems to avoid the negative connotations of bastard.
Someone I am related to on my wife's side was having difficulty obtaining her father's consent to marry her beloved. He was a foreigner and her father was a bigot. They overcame his objections by deliberately becoming pregnant. They both were and still are active in their Southern Baptist church. They are still happily married, and grandparents. Did they do wrong?
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�
Steven Novella
Steven Novella
- chelbelle89
- Student
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 9:59 pm
- Location: Georgia
Post #9
I do not believe that sex before marriage is wrong so long as the two consenting parties involved are responsible and mature enough to handle the possible outcomes:So if two consenting, SINGLE adults decide ot have premarital sex and they use protection, what really is the problem with it? Why is it so wrong and what are the ramifications. And please don't bother with the answer "Because God says it's wrong". Let's try to apply some reasoning and logic to this.
Why is it so sinful?
What are the ramifications of doing it?
If there are ramifications just how serious are they and how likely are they to occur?
Sex in many cases does not just come with the physical risks, such as unwanted pregnancies, STD's, yeast and urinary tract infections, it also comes with the emotional risk. Two people do not just meet and have sex. Generally an emotional attachment is formed before hand, due to one or both parties needing a sense of trust. Now, of course this does not include one-night stands due to substance interference (such as with alcohol). This sense of trust that comes with giving yourself to another person is something that leaves one feeling extremely vulnerable. If or when that relationship has ended, sex makes it an even more difficult break -up. Not to mention the emotional toll it would put on the potential child, should the birthcontrol fail. Whether the child is kept or put up for adoption, there would be emotional consequences to the child that never had a choice in the matter. You would need to consider this as well. I will not even attempt to express the issues facing foster children or children of single parents, not to mention the tax burden that these children of foster care and single parents pose. And while yes, these children can overcome such emotional obstacles, it is not by any means easy. Is our thirty-minute pleasure worth risking a child's well-being?
I do not believe that these outcomes would qualify a law against premarital sex, by any means. However, as previously stated, the two adults must really weigh the consequences. They are not the only two people involved, because there is the potential for life when having intercourse. I think this is a very socially responsible approach to pre-marital sex.
"Before God we are all equally wise- and equally foolish."
~Albert Einstein
~Albert Einstein
- Defender of Truth
- Scholar
- Posts: 441
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:07 pm
- Location: United States