POI wrote: ↑Mon Dec 23, 2024 2:47 pm
No study required. It would take me a text wall to explain what you could instead grasp in 4 minutes, via visual aid, etc... Without knowing these variables, which were discovered, you will continue with the strawman.
Well again, if you can't explain it in simplistic terms, then you don't understand the subject well enough.
Again, with the apples vs oranges. Nothing I'm arguing here has anything to do with 'origins'. Without the knowledge I'm trying to give you, it is impossible to state you know what evolutionary biology proposes.
Does the evolutionary biology process propose that whales were once land dwelling animals?
No filibustering.
Yes, or no? Simple question.
Evolutionary biology has no denominations. You get the same information given to you, regardless of what school you attend. On the other hand, I could go to a Catholic school and get differing 'facts' than if I were to instead go to a non-Catholic school. Hence, your attempt at comparing me to you are unfounded.
Yeah but that means nothing if the entire thing is a lie. So basically, you get the same lie regardless of what school you attend.
At least with Christian denominations, you have a better chance of at least one of them being true
More doubling down... More strawman. More beliefs based upon false premises. More refusal to receive new information, in favor of protecting a comfortable view.
Ok, I don't understand evolution. I admit it. Cool? Now, can I be left alone on this topic?
The moderator does not take sides. They have to agree with the report, based upon the rules. A million reports could be generated, and if they do not align with breaking the rules, they will be ignored.
Sure, go with that. Although at least one has earned my respect.
No. In other words, remain cordial and you will not have problems.
Alright, coach.
What would Jesus do in this case?
He brings the sword. (Matt 10:34-36)
You see now, was that a cordial statement? Simmer down.
Well, if saying someone botched my point is an example of an uncordial statement, then uh..
1) I asked a question. I did not assert this was your position, which is why it has a question mark.
The mere tone of the question was flippant and sarcastic.
2) So, you do not think my current position is one of denial to the truth of knowing there actually is a "grand creator"? Not only have you insinuated as such in the past, but the Bible also blatantly expresses this -- (Romans 1:20)
Yes, that is exactly what I think although I don't recall your response properly fitting my statement.
But, it is no big deal. Nothing to write home about or call the Feds on.
Yes, and every dog I ever own, whom has puppies, will produce new dogs as their offspring. Now please educate yourself on what you admit you do not know. I've given you a quick reference, but you refuse it. So if you want to instead learn on your own, you can go into the deep depths of the Dover trail, in what was spoken about, regarding common ancestry. Once you understand the significance of Chromosome #2, why telomeres and centromeres are not where they belong, and how the GNOME is related, you will then have a much better grasp on evolutionary biological discovery.
I already admitted I don't understand evolution..so this is now a dead issue.
What are you laughing about exactly? If I was to believe in "key goblins", and my keys turn up missing, and the BEST EXPLANATION is 'key goblins', I guess I've demonstrated 'key goblins'? I'll answer for you. No. I first have to present a 'key goblin' before I can add it in as a viable option.
No, you do not need to go beyond what is necessary to produce the effect.
I got 99 problems, dude.
Don't become the hundredth one.
