Obama dispises liberty

Two hot topics for the price of one

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
McCulloch
Site Supporter
Posts: 24063
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Toronto, ON, CA
Been thanked: 3 times

Obama dispises liberty

Post #1

Post by McCulloch »

RyanP wrote:Obama's election could be punishment for an evil nation.
bernee51 wrote:Or a reward to a nation coming to its senses.
RyanP wrote:Only if you despise liberty and support socialism.
Does Obama despise liberty and support socialism? Is he one of those Godless communists?
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John

User avatar
JoeyKnothead
Banned
Banned
Posts: 20879
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
Location: Here
Has thanked: 4093 times
Been thanked: 2573 times

Post #651

Post by JoeyKnothead »

From Post 647:
lastcallhall wrote: I guess you discount all the millions of people than that feel it is not torture or if you want to call it torture find it acceptable because no physical harm comes to that person.
Argumentum ad populum, either way. Still, lack of oxygen to the brain, as occurs in waterboarding, can be shown to cause irreperable physical damage to the brain. (This doesn't mention psychological damage, of which I find many a theist willing to allow / ignore - and indicative of the psychological "torture" inflicted to ensure religious belief and adherents.) How much of such we're willing to allow is another issue. I'm personally divided over the issue. Torture if it'll save my son, a US Airman? I'd torture the Pope. Torture in an attempt to inflict distress just because one thinks valuable information may be had? I'm not so sure.
lastcallhall wrote: We are not cutting off hands, feet, or a head. We do not rape women like many terrorists do, we dunk their head under the water to give them the feeling of drowning. To me that is not a bad thing.
Are you saying you'd be willing to undergo waterboarding so we can conduct further medical and psychological tests?

"Dunking their head underwater" is, imo, a euphemism, when "preventing one from actually breathing" is the more apt descriptor.
lastcallhall wrote: Jesus was non-violent but he would not sit by and let sin go unpunished.
So it's claimed, with scant supporting evidence beyond the booking making the claim. That Jesus would have one's enemies "slain before Me" indicates He could be down with some violence if it suited His goals.
lastcallhall wrote: I think putting a convicted murderer to death for his crimes is an acceptable punishment, maybe you do not.
I agree with the punishment, but seek assurances the innocent are not caught up in our zeal.
lastcallhall wrote: I am sorry you do not view America as exceptional, I view the US as the greatest country God ever let in the history of the world.
IMO, a country can be both exceptional, and wrong. I propose we find our greatest exceptionalism in seeking to ensure due process and humane treatment of even our worst enemies. God or not.
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin

User avatar
East of Eden
Under Suspension
Posts: 7032
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Post #652

Post by East of Eden »

Board wrote: It most certainly is not. Water boarding is torture. Period. There is no matter of opinion. If you bothered to read any of the definitions I presented on what is or is not torture you would be able to grasp this concept.
You call it torture, I call it the first bath these vermin have had in years.
So the ends justify the immoral means... is that the Christian perspective?
That is your contention about immorality, not mine.
All humans deserve due cause.
Does that extend to unborn humans?
Wow... really? First your God committing whole scale world wiping cannot be shown to be true.
That is my belief, I never claimed I could prove it.
Second God is OK with assassination? Really? How ab Jesus? He OK with that?
Jesus said 'Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's', and never reprimanded a soldier for being in the Roman Army.
NEWS FLASH - Killing is also immoral. Get it?
Nothing but your opinion, which I don't care about. Want to back that up from a Christian perspective? God arranged the deaths of many evil people.
Yes we know you like what the former CIA chief has to say and it has been presented here that several other authorities on the issue disagree with him. Got anything else?
Do I have any more evidence that would change your preconceived notions? Probably not. :roll:
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE

User avatar
East of Eden
Under Suspension
Posts: 7032
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Post #653

Post by East of Eden »

JoeyKnothead wrote: Argumentum ad populum, either way. Still, lack of oxygen to the brain, as occurs in waterboarding, can be shown to cause irreperable physical damage to the brain.
There was no brain damage (that wasn't there before) done to the three people we waterboarded, and there were doctors present.
Torture if it'll save my son, a US Airman? I'd torture the Pope.
Wouldn't you do that anyway? Just kidding.
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE

User avatar
JoeyKnothead
Banned
Banned
Posts: 20879
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
Location: Here
Has thanked: 4093 times
Been thanked: 2573 times

Post #654

Post by JoeyKnothead »

From Post 650:
East of Eden wrote:
JoeyKnothead wrote: Argumentum ad populum, either way. Still, lack of oxygen to the brain, as occurs in waterboarding, can be shown to cause irreperable physical damage to the brain.
There was no brain damage (that wasn't there before) done to the three people we waterboarded, and there were doctors present.
That doctors are present does in no way affect the fact that when the brain lacks oxygen, cells begin to die. But I love the "that wasn't there before".

My point is, mostly getting back to the psychological aspect, is that we simply can not predict to what extent such damage may or may not occur, given the secrecy involved and the various lengths of time the act occurs involved. A reasonable person may legitimately conclude that waterboarding constitutes torture - in that the act, "carried to it's logical conclusion" will produce death in the individual. Such an act can be legitimately - if not legally - considered torture in that the "tortuee" can not know if they are breathing their last breath. Waterboarding is both physical and psychological torture - regardless of whether it is justified or not.
East of Eden wrote: Wouldn't you do that anyway? Just kidding.
Win ;)
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin

sarabellum

Hi...

Post #655

Post by sarabellum »

Perhaps an on site poll would be in order? (That might be too political?)
:D


I can not wrap my head around waterboarding not being a form of torture.

Forcing someone not to drown?

The chinese water torture for the new age?

Just because they have doctors around watching, means it probably not a massage.

Enhanced interrogation?
One discriptive word to many?
Thats a sign.

User avatar
otseng
Savant
Posts: 20796
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Has thanked: 211 times
Been thanked: 361 times
Contact:

Post #656

Post by otseng »

East of Eden wrote:If another 9/11 or worse could be prevented with waterboarding, only a lunatic would oppose it.
Moderator Comment

Please avoid suggesting that anyone would be a lunatic for holding a particular position.


______________

Moderator comments do not count as a strike against any posters. They only serve as an acknowledgment that a post report has been received, but has not been judged to warrant a moderator warning against a particular poster.

Post Reply