That's the gist of what I'm getting from an individual in my conversation with him.
It sounds very scientific. By following the proper rules of interpretation the correct understanding of Scriptures should always result.
So why isn't there a consistent product if there exists a fail proof formula.
I wonder what spirits those with a perverted understanding of Christ have?
The Holy Spirit gave us correct hermeneutics.
Moderator: Moderators
- JehovahsWitness
- Savant
- Posts: 22822
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
- Has thanked: 892 times
- Been thanked: 1331 times
- Contact:
Re: The Holy Spirit gave us correct hermeneutics.
Post #31Is this conclusion not based on the premise that all people are interpreting with holy spirit? Can this premise be proven?
JW
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
Re: The Holy Spirit gave us correct hermeneutics.
Post #32[Replying to post 31 by JehovahsWitness]
About the same probability that anyone has the Holy Spirit.
About the same probability that anyone has the Holy Spirit.
- JehovahsWitness
- Savant
- Posts: 22822
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
- Has thanked: 892 times
- Been thanked: 1331 times
- Contact:
Re: The Holy Spirit gave us correct hermeneutics.
Post #33[Replying to post 32 by postroad]
So do you think it's 100% probable all claimants have holy spirit or is there in your opinion 0% probability probability? How do you make your calculations or .. are you saying that "No your premise cannot be proven and you are making a statement of faith"?
JW
NOTE All posts I write represent my personal faith based beliefs as one of Jehovah's Witnesses
So do you think it's 100% probable all claimants have holy spirit or is there in your opinion 0% probability probability? How do you make your calculations or .. are you saying that "No your premise cannot be proven and you are making a statement of faith"?
JW
NOTE All posts I write represent my personal faith based beliefs as one of Jehovah's Witnesses
Last edited by JehovahsWitness on Thu Feb 07, 2019 10:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
Re: The Holy Spirit gave us correct hermeneutics.
Post #34[Replying to post 33 by JehovahsWitness]
How is it faith? The Holy Spirit and its functions are described in Scriptures.
One only need to take that description and compare it to reality in order to determine if anything resembling that description exists.
You organization in particular has shown itself wanting. A history of failed prophecy related to the date 1914. That generation is so extended that a contemporary generation doctrine needed to be invented.
The following video shows the absurdity of the concept.
How is it faith? The Holy Spirit and its functions are described in Scriptures.
One only need to take that description and compare it to reality in order to determine if anything resembling that description exists.
You organization in particular has shown itself wanting. A history of failed prophecy related to the date 1914. That generation is so extended that a contemporary generation doctrine needed to be invented.
The following video shows the absurdity of the concept.
- Tcg
- Savant
- Posts: 8667
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
- Location: Third Stone
- Has thanked: 2257 times
- Been thanked: 2368 times
Re: The Holy Spirit gave us correct hermeneutics.
Post #35Holy Spirit singular? Certainly not. If you reread my statement which you quoted, you'll see that I used "Holy Spirits" which is quite obviously plural.JehovahsWitness wrote:Tcg wrote:
There seems to be as many Holy Spirits as there are people interpreting the Bible.
Is this conclusion not based on the premise that all people are interpreting with holy spirit?
To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods.
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1871
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 12:07 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 2 times
Post #36
Where did Ezekiel add to the law, so I can properly argue? I do agree modern Christianity is far from what Christ or the Apostles followed.postroad wrote: [Replying to post 25 by brianbbs67]
Ezekiel must have forgotten about this text?
Deuteronomy 4:2
Do not add to what I command you and do not subtract from it, but keep the commands of the Lord your God that I give you.
Deuteronomy 12:32
See that you do all I command you; do not add to it or take away from it.
Although Christianity does both.
Post #37
[Replying to post 36 by brianbbs67]
Read the book. It's practically a whole new set of Temple ordinances.
Read the book. It's practically a whole new set of Temple ordinances.