A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
marketandchurch
Scholar
Posts: 358
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:51 am
Location: The People's Republic Of Portland

A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1

Post by marketandchurch »

This was the post that got me banned on Christian Chat:
Then God doesn't care about the goodness and decency of an atheist, a buddhist, etc. And if that is the message you are telling me, then there is no point to being a good person. There is no point of fighting on behalf of the oppressed, as America did, in WWII. The only purpose of fighting the Japanese, and beating back the Nazi's should have been so that we could bring more people to christ...is that what your saying? Should America be sending food and aid to heathens in Haiti? Should America be helping out muslims in disaster relief fallowing a natural disaster, unless it is to bring them to Christ? Is a person's only value to you, there potential to become a convert? They have no humanity beyond that?

You have an old testament my_adonai, and you are to be as obsessed with its obsessions, as you are with the new testament's. And the Old Testament's preoccupation is fighting evil, championing the good, and making a more ethical existence, during this lifetime.

And unless you think Christians alone can make this lifetime a little better, a little less genocidal, with a little less starvation, a little less torture, etc, it is an unethical message to peddle, that a good God would demand goodness, unless one doesn't believe in his son. Then one's goodness is pointless. One might as well not care about not gossiping behind other people's back, destroying someone's dignity in public, sleeping with a coworker's wife, extorting an elderly couple that one was hired to help, raping a pre-pubcescent child, killing another human being because of their skin color, etc, etc, etc.

Apparently, I was challenging people's faith, and was just there to be anti-christian, in saying that a Good God would not send to hell decent people, simply because they do not believe in his Son. I got all sorts of less then appetizing replies, saying I'm screwed for eternity, if I don't accept Jesus. I feel that I am not alone, even within the Christian community, in thinking this as I've heard many catholic priests, and mainstream protestant pastors, while I was growing up, distancing themselves from such a belief. I don't know where people on this forum stand, but I'll put it up for debate:

  • Topic of Debate: A Good God would not send to hell a decent person, simply for not believing in his son.


If you agree with me, and are a Christian, please square your response with the rest of the New Testament. What I'm looking for is scriptural consistency to back up your position, and more importantly, how one will then re-read the entire message of the New Testament, if one wants to hold that position. I say this because I don't want you to drop scripture, simply because it doesn't conform to your own personal beliefs, but I am looking for how one can reinterpret the New testament, if one drops that central tenant, & for the rest of us, impediment, to everlasting life. Is there room for this? Or is the New Testament rigidly in the affirmative about Christ being the only way to heaven? Which is fine. That's their theology, but let's see where this goes.

User avatar
tam
Savant
Posts: 6522
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 4:59 pm
Has thanked: 360 times
Been thanked: 331 times
Contact:

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1091

Post by tam »

onewithhim wrote:
ttruscott wrote:
onewithhim wrote: Having said that, there are indeed parts of the Bible that I cannot re-read. They are disgusting. How can I feel good about God? Because I don't think He inspired every single word. I think that the portions of scripture that are foul do NOT reflect Jehovah's nature.
There we go. Please share with us your credentials that allow you to place yourself as the arbiter of what is scripture and what is from man only? Does your Church support this stance of yours? Are you aware that scripture attests to itself in 2 Timothy 3:16 All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17 so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work. Do you not fear being inadequately prepared for every good work? Are you not concerned about trusting your emotional attitude to what is written your guide to understanding?
No, my church does not support my stance. Every scripture is considered inspired of God. I have to be honest, and I can't say that I can accept the bloody war scenes in the Bible as totally inspired by God, and this is ME. I don't just parrot whatever I hear from the WT. I have studied and meditated on the Scriptures for years. I agree with the WT on everything except the acceptance of bloody slaughter of innocent people, particularly children. I will have to answer to God for my views.

Good for you!

The scriptures are meant to point to Christ (John 5:39). But they are subject to the errors of the scribes: Jeremiah 8:8: "How can you say 'We are wise, for we have the law of YHWH, when actually the false stylus of the pens has handled it falsely." Christ also said 'woe to you scribes'. Of course there may also be translation issues, as I am sure you know that not all words in all languages are translated properly. This thread and the other thread on hell are a perfect example of the work of 'the false pen of the scribes.' Because of what they have turned hades/sheol/gehenna/tartarus into... and creating this entire false doctrine of hell (eternal torment).


But it is Christ who shows the truth of His Father, because Christ is the Truth, the Image and the Word of God. Not the bible, or the OT, or the Israelites, or Christendom, or men, etc.


[Jesus] answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. If you really know me, you will know my Father as well."



So yes, to those asking of you, a person can pick and choose: all according to the TRUTH (Christ).

"This is my Son, whom I love. Listen to Him."



Peace to you onewithhim,
your servant and a slave of Christ,
tammy

User avatar
marco
Savant
Posts: 12314
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2015 3:15 pm
Location: Scotland
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1092

Post by marco »

tam wrote:
The scriptures are meant to point to Christ (John 5:39). But they are subject to the errors of the scribes: Jeremiah 8:8:

But it is Christ who shows the truth of His Father, because Christ is the Truth, the Image and the Word of God. Not the bible, or the OT, or the Israelites, or Christendom, or men, etc.


What you have done is covered your eyes with a comfort blanket, erasing all reference to nastiness. You have invented a fairy tale world. Christ said that he came to sow dissension; Christ's act of love was performed in blood; Christ's "Father in heaven" orchestrated a horrendous passion and death for his son, and called it love of mankind. Where in all this is there GOOD?

You deny this negative part. Do you REALLY suppose that if the correct picture were one of delight and joy with no punishment or nastiness, the authors would NOT have wanted to proclaim this as GOOD NEWS? What is the attraction of punishment? And if you once admit there are mistakes, what's wrong with the view that all is bad (truth) and eternal bliss is a falsehood?

The final responsibility for getting the message home is with God's messenger. It seems he failed. But best regards - at least you have optimism which is a rare commodity.

User avatar
ttruscott
Site Supporter
Posts: 11064
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:09 pm
Location: West Coast of Canada
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1093

Post by ttruscott »

tam wrote:
onewithhim wrote:
ttruscott wrote:
onewithhim wrote: Having said that, there are indeed parts of the Bible that I cannot re-read. They are disgusting. How can I feel good about God? Because I don't think He inspired every single word. I think that the portions of scripture that are foul do NOT reflect Jehovah's nature.
There we go. Please share with us your credentials that allow you to place yourself as the arbiter of what is scripture and what is from man only? Does your Church support this stance of yours? Are you aware that scripture attests to itself in 2 Timothy 3:16 All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17 so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work. Do you not fear being inadequately prepared for every good work? Are you not concerned about trusting your emotional attitude to what is written your guide to understanding?
No, my church does not support my stance. Every scripture is considered inspired of God. I have to be honest, and I can't say that I can accept the bloody war scenes in the Bible as totally inspired by God, and this is ME. I don't just parrot whatever I hear from the WT. I have studied and meditated on the Scriptures for years. I agree with the WT on everything except the acceptance of bloody slaughter of innocent people, particularly children. I will have to answer to God for my views.

Good for you!

The scriptures are meant to point to Christ (John 5:39). But they are subject to the errors of the scribes: Jeremiah 8:8: "How can you say 'We are wise, for we have the law of YHWH, when actually the false stylus of the pens has handled it falsely." Christ also said 'woe to you scribes'. Of course there may also be translation issues, as I am sure you know that not all words in all languages are translated properly. This thread and the other thread on hell are a perfect example of the work of 'the false pen of the scribes.' Because of what they have turned hades/sheol/gehenna/tartarus into... and creating this entire false doctrine of hell (eternal torment).


But it is Christ who shows the truth of His Father, because Christ is the Truth, the Image and the Word of God. Not the bible, or the OT, or the Israelites, or Christendom, or men, etc.


[Jesus] answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. If you really know me, you will know my Father as well."



So yes, to those asking of you, a person can pick and choose: all according to the TRUTH (Christ).

"This is my Son, whom I love. Listen to Him."

Peace to you onewithhim,
your servant and a slave of Christ,
tammy

You both must answer every day: "What is your expertise that allows you to place yourself as the arbiter of what is scripture and what is from man only?"

It seems a convenient way to avoid what negates? confounds? your concepts whereas I have to have an interpretation for every scripture to fit in.
PCE Theology as I see it...

We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.

This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.

User avatar
tam
Savant
Posts: 6522
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 4:59 pm
Has thanked: 360 times
Been thanked: 331 times
Contact:

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1094

Post by tam »

marco wrote:
tam wrote:
The scriptures are meant to point to Christ (John 5:39). But they are subject to the errors of the scribes: Jeremiah 8:8:

But it is Christ who shows the truth of His Father, because Christ is the Truth, the Image and the Word of God. Not the bible, or the OT, or the Israelites, or Christendom, or men, etc.


What you have done is covered your eyes with a comfort blanket, erasing all reference to nastiness. You have invented a fairy tale world. Christ said that he came to sow dissension; Christ's act of love was performed in blood; Christ's "Father in heaven" orchestrated a horrendous passion and death for his son, and called it love of mankind. Where in all this is there GOOD?

You deny this negative part. Do you REALLY suppose that if the correct picture were one of delight and joy with no punishment or nastiness, the authors would NOT have wanted to proclaim this as GOOD NEWS? What is the attraction of punishment? And if you once admit there are mistakes, what's wrong with the view that all is bad (truth) and eternal bliss is a falsehood?

The final responsibility for getting the message home is with God's messenger. It seems he failed. But best regards - at least you have optimism which is a rare commodity.
(to the bold) Not at all. Most people just aren't listening to God's actual messenger; His actual Word. They are listening to the Bible, and/or to religion, and/or to various interpretations, and/or to various doctrines, etc. Within all of these, a person will find some truth (with which to mislead even the elect).

But one will not know ALL truth anywhere - except in/from Christ. He does not teach false. He is the Truth. So why in the world would anyone (who claims to be following Christ and God) put anything or anyone or any of the many many so-called 'truths' out there, before Him?



My response - from some of what I have learned from Christ - on the topic at hand is on page 88.


Peace to you,
your servant and a slave of Christ,
tammy

User avatar
onewithhim
Savant
Posts: 10889
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:56 pm
Location: Norwich, CT
Has thanked: 1537 times
Been thanked: 435 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1095

Post by onewithhim »

ttruscott wrote:
tam wrote:
onewithhim wrote:
ttruscott wrote:
onewithhim wrote: Having said that, there are indeed parts of the Bible that I cannot re-read. They are disgusting. How can I feel good about God? Because I don't think He inspired every single word. I think that the portions of scripture that are foul do NOT reflect Jehovah's nature.
There we go. Please share with us your credentials that allow you to place yourself as the arbiter of what is scripture and what is from man only? Does your Church support this stance of yours? Are you aware that scripture attests to itself in 2 Timothy 3:16 All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17 so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work. Do you not fear being inadequately prepared for every good work? Are you not concerned about trusting your emotional attitude to what is written your guide to understanding?
No, my church does not support my stance. Every scripture is considered inspired of God. I have to be honest, and I can't say that I can accept the bloody war scenes in the Bible as totally inspired by God, and this is ME. I don't just parrot whatever I hear from the WT. I have studied and meditated on the Scriptures for years. I agree with the WT on everything except the acceptance of bloody slaughter of innocent people, particularly children. I will have to answer to God for my views.

Good for you!

The scriptures are meant to point to Christ (John 5:39). But they are subject to the errors of the scribes: Jeremiah 8:8: "How can you say 'We are wise, for we have the law of YHWH, when actually the false stylus of the pens has handled it falsely." Christ also said 'woe to you scribes'. Of course there may also be translation issues, as I am sure you know that not all words in all languages are translated properly. This thread and the other thread on hell are a perfect example of the work of 'the false pen of the scribes.' Because of what they have turned hades/sheol/gehenna/tartarus into... and creating this entire false doctrine of hell (eternal torment).


But it is Christ who shows the truth of His Father, because Christ is the Truth, the Image and the Word of God. Not the bible, or the OT, or the Israelites, or Christendom, or men, etc.


[Jesus] answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. If you really know me, you will know my Father as well."



So yes, to those asking of you, a person can pick and choose: all according to the TRUTH (Christ).

"This is my Son, whom I love. Listen to Him."

Peace to you onewithhim,
your servant and a slave of Christ,
tammy

You both must answer every day: "What is your expertise that allows you to place yourself as the arbiter of what is scripture and what is from man only?"

It seems a convenient way to avoid what negates? confounds? your concepts whereas I have to have an interpretation for every scripture to fit in.
There you go. Criticizing for being convinced of one's own beliefs. How about you? Are you convinced of YOUR beliefs? No one is claiming "expertise." I know I just want to share points that I have found in my research. You would be very kind if you would explain exactly why you disagree, instead of denigrating me and others for what we believe.

User avatar
ttruscott
Site Supporter
Posts: 11064
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:09 pm
Location: West Coast of Canada
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1096

Post by ttruscott »

marco wrote:
ttruscott wrote:
marco wrote: Conclusion: hell is outside everything that we would understand to be good and fair.
Please consider:
IF we are created as eternal spirits and
IF we self re-create ourselves as eternally evil by our free will and
IF a little leaven leavens the whole lump means that a little sin corrupts the whole of created reality

I don't of course accept these premises so whatever conclusion you draw from them I cannot share.
1. We may be created as eternal spirits but we are discussing our behaviour as carnal entities.
Yes of course, but this speaks to our being eternally around and involved...
marco wrote: 2. I can't see any meaning in "self re-create ourselves as eternally evil". I wonder where you got this from.
I got it from the following logic:
1. GOD is holy so cannot create evil.
2. Everyone was created ingenuously innocent.
3. Therefore for us to be evil we must have caused that evil in ourselves by our own free will decision to be rebellious to GOD.

Also:
1. GOD would not send anyone to 'hell' if they could be saved.
2. If they cannot be saved it must mean that they chose a sin that put themselves outside of GOd's mercy and grace for eternity, thus they re-created themselves from innocent to eternally evil.

I got this logic from the Spirit I follow because I think He is the Holy Spirit of YHWH.
marco wrote: 3. The little leaven is an analogy and it is fallacious to deduce consequences from your chosen symbol.
Technically I'd call it a type, a physical event that prophesies a future event: the escape from Egypt and slavery to the promised land is the type fulfilled by our escape from the enslaving addiction to evil to become heaven ready. The ceremony of cleaning the house from all leaven has been carried out to this day - it is a very important part of the flight from the enslaving addiction to evil and since leaven is a serious symbol in the New Testament, I have no qualms about using it in my theology in the way you have seen as the symbol for that which will corrupt everything if not removed....how much bigger of a 'whole lump' can exist than everything in heaven and the physical universe? Whole means whole, eh?
marco wrote: You say:
ttruscott wrote: "Thus given the right premises hell is a logical necessity forced upon GOD"


And you've chosen the "right premises" to get that conclusion - I agree. They are not acceptable premises, however. The idea of something "forced upon God" sounds paradoxical given that God can do anything. It would be amazing if some human restricted him in any way. But if you believe that humans can impose limitations on God, so be it.


Now is where I encourage you to walk me through the logic and show where it is wrong, :)

No man forces GOD, HE forces HIMself by choosing to go a certain way and by binding HIMself to that way fully.

HE allowed evil by allowing free will.
HE warned that everyone who rejected HIS deity would go to hell.
Some rejected HIS deity.
HE is forced by HIS holiness and their eternal evil to fulfill HIS warning and to banish them to the outer darkness which feels like Gehenna.
PCE Theology as I see it...

We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.

This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.

User avatar
ttruscott
Site Supporter
Posts: 11064
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:09 pm
Location: West Coast of Canada
Been thanked: 3 times

Post #1097

Post by ttruscott »

onewithhim wrote:
Let's just take the word "spirit." Ru'ach & pneu'ma basically mean "breath" but have extended meanings beyond that basic sense. There are quite a number of meanings that are regularly assigned to "spirit."

(1) Wind
(2) The vital force in living creatures
(3) One's spirit, or, impelling mental inclination (the force that causes a person to display a certain attitude or emotion)
(4) Spirit persons
(5) Holy Spirit

The wind is from the same words in Hebrew and Greek as spirit person, but of course we wouldn't say that the wind is really a spirit person. Neither would we say that angels are just God's breath.

You insist on saying that "spirit" and "soul" are the same things, though they are from different words and mean different things.....OK, that's your prerogative. I am confident that they do NOT mean the same thing.
When a person is in a car they are called a driver that says nothing about their person-hood.

Same thing? Yeah, sort of: all people/persons/individuals with self awareness and who were created with a free will in HIS image are (4) Spirit persons. They have a reality in Spiritual realms but no body. When one is put into a physical body, the spirit becomes entrapped in the body and is called a soul. It is entrapped by the sarx, the flesh. There is nothing in the definitions of the words against this interpretation.

The choice to ignore this interpretation is a theological choice based on previous choices that have assumed the force of a bias. Most of Christianity is biased against our pre-conception existence since they are totally committed to our being created on earth, either at conception or at birth. I gather that the JW doctrine is in favour of this bias.
PCE Theology as I see it...

We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.

This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.

myth-one.com
Savant
Posts: 7466
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:16 pm
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 98 times
Contact:

Post #1098

Post by myth-one.com »

ttruscott wrote:Same thing? Yeah, sort of: all people/persons/individuals with self awareness and who were created with a free will in HIS image are (4) Spirit persons. They have a reality in Spiritual realms but no body.
The Bible describes only two type of bodies, natural and spiritual:
There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body. (I Corinthians 15:44)
So spirits do have a body -- a spiritual body!

Each of these bodies require a separate birth:
That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. (John 3:6)
ttruscott wrote:When one is put into a physical body, the spirit becomes entrapped in the body and is called a soul.
John 4:24 wrote:God is a Spirit: . . .
Can He be trapped in a physical body?

You are creating a third body type -- The ttruscott hybrid!

A spirit can be trapped in a physical body -- that's hilarious!
ttruscott wrote:It is entrapped by the sarx, the flesh. There is nothing in the definitions of the words against this interpretation.
This is totally unsupported in the scriptures!

User avatar
tam
Savant
Posts: 6522
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 4:59 pm
Has thanked: 360 times
Been thanked: 331 times
Contact:

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1099

Post by tam »

ttruscott wrote:
tam wrote:
onewithhim wrote:
ttruscott wrote:
onewithhim wrote: Having said that, there are indeed parts of the Bible that I cannot re-read. They are disgusting. How can I feel good about God? Because I don't think He inspired every single word. I think that the portions of scripture that are foul do NOT reflect Jehovah's nature.
There we go. Please share with us your credentials that allow you to place yourself as the arbiter of what is scripture and what is from man only? Does your Church support this stance of yours? Are you aware that scripture attests to itself in 2 Timothy 3:16 All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17 so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work. Do you not fear being inadequately prepared for every good work? Are you not concerned about trusting your emotional attitude to what is written your guide to understanding?
No, my church does not support my stance. Every scripture is considered inspired of God. I have to be honest, and I can't say that I can accept the bloody war scenes in the Bible as totally inspired by God, and this is ME. I don't just parrot whatever I hear from the WT. I have studied and meditated on the Scriptures for years. I agree with the WT on everything except the acceptance of bloody slaughter of innocent people, particularly children. I will have to answer to God for my views.

Good for you!

The scriptures are meant to point to Christ (John 5:39). But they are subject to the errors of the scribes: Jeremiah 8:8: "How can you say 'We are wise, for we have the law of YHWH, when actually the false stylus of the pens has handled it falsely." Christ also said 'woe to you scribes'. Of course there may also be translation issues, as I am sure you know that not all words in all languages are translated properly. This thread and the other thread on hell are a perfect example of the work of 'the false pen of the scribes.' Because of what they have turned hades/sheol/gehenna/tartarus into... and creating this entire false doctrine of hell (eternal torment).


But it is Christ who shows the truth of His Father, because Christ is the Truth, the Image and the Word of God. Not the bible, or the OT, or the Israelites, or Christendom, or men, etc.


[Jesus] answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. If you really know me, you will know my Father as well."



So yes, to those asking of you, a person can pick and choose: all according to the TRUTH (Christ).

"This is my Son, whom I love. Listen to Him."

Peace to you onewithhim,
your servant and a slave of Christ,
tammy

You both must answer every day: "What is your expertise that allows you to place yourself as the arbiter of what is scripture and what is from man only?"

It seems a convenient way to avoid what negates? confounds? your concepts whereas I have to have an interpretation for every scripture to fit in.

Was there something incorrect in my post?


Peace to you,
your servant and a slave of Christ,
tammy

User avatar
marco
Savant
Posts: 12314
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2015 3:15 pm
Location: Scotland
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1100

Post by marco »

tam wrote:
Most people just aren't listening to God's actual messenger; His actual Word. They are listening to the Bible, and/or to religion, and/or to various interpretations, and/or to various doctrines, etc. Within all of these, a person will find some truth (with which to mislead even the elect).
And whose fault is that? Christ wrote nothing down. You say the Bible doesn't always give the true picture, correctly pointing out the errors made by scribes. But from this flawed text we have the sole evidence of what Christ allegedly said, and you quote freely while advising us not to take the Bible too seriously. Shall we use the salt when it loses its flavour?
tam wrote: But one will not know ALL truth anywhere - except in/from Christ. He does not teach false. He is the Truth. So why in the world would anyone (who claims to be following Christ and God) put anything or anyone or any of the many many so-called 'truths' out there, before Him?
But as I said, Christ does not write. He allows scribes to speak for him. This means that we have a huge industry trying to guess and interpret what he might have said, not knowing if the scribes erred. The Catholic Church took your advice and believed that Christ would not "let the gates of hell prevail against it." It is therefore logical that, when that church seeks clarification and direction, she has to believe Christ will infallibly grant it.

Your path is not as straight as you would have us believe.
The days darken round me and the years
Among new men, strange faces, other minds.
Tennyson

Post Reply