No one can monopolize God nor can God be limited only to some others .
If God exists (which I believe He does), then I would agree it is impossible to monopolize Him directly. However, for whatever reasons, God has certainly allowed that many "concepts" of Himself CAN indeed be invented, exploited and/or monopolized. I do not understand that, I just make sure to protect myself against that.
We are not saying any of these for we believe God to the God of all and God can speak to anyone whom God wishes to without any reservation at all.
Of course. BUT... there are ALWAYS those who will take their perceptions of God beyond what is "personal", and literally PUSH their "truth" upon other people. It's not new, it's not rare and it's not particularly difficult to recognize.
God is very clear in His teaching to us that we are all at par with each other without any one of us above with our own fellow. Not even Moses is higher than you or me and so is Paul.
This is NOT "clear" to all human beings; even MANY who embrace the Bible as their sacred or revered text. I generally agree that we are ALL equals as human beings, but many (even a large number of Bible-believers and other religious folks) DO NOT.
If the necessity of defending oneself from those who consider themselves superior and more worthy were insignificant, I wouldn't be addressing anything about it. In fact, it is surely one of the MAIN concerns I have with the manner in which religion is so often used. You can SAY that someone might have a direct connection to the heart/mind of God (I really can't debate that), but I can (and likely should) be poised to SCRUTINIZE the ideas, concepts and actions which are often claimed to originate from any such (alleged) "
connection".
At a personal level, the idea that "GOD SAID" can be and likely is appropriate. But all too often, I have witnessed many who have claimed to pick up "godly" ideas and attitudes from "God", yet are as questionable as the status of shifting-sand. Love to me is like CASH MONEY (when it comes to godliness). And I can tell you or anyone else, that I wouldn't really trust a thing they SAY about God, if they somehow prove that "love" is NOT their mode and motive; I want little or nothing to do with them... a relationship with someone like that tends to be either draining or meaningless period.
Yes, I know/believe God can and does communicate directly with human hearts; but deciphering what's OF the human being and what is truly of The Creator, is NOT always simple and/or clear. I don't have to debate that within myself, but I realize that it is something that is
debatable (as indicated by our exchanges).
melikio wrote: And worst of all, they would actually TREAT others (in God's name), AS IF they are THAT MUCH BETTER (or more worthy) than other human beings.
This is not true if you will place yourself under the direct custody of God himself.
I call such
custody "love"; I see very few compelling reasons beyond love (1Cor13)
(and certain secular laws), to tolerate or endure much of that which we humans tend to throw at one another (by our very nature, even using the "Bible").
Totally put yourself under the custody and care of God himself and all your worries and apprehensions will be taken cared of by the Lord and they will just be a mere history in your life.
I see your point. Been there, done that... and STILL had to learn things beyond what you claim. I know at a spiritual level what you say has strong merit (to me at least), but I have to be realistic in this imperfect physical world. And sure, we have different approaches to "faith" (it seems), but I am virtually certain that God has a reason for allowing such differences to exist.
I know "
faith", "
hope" and "
LOVE" prevail (with some believers), but I don't claim to be perfect in any of those aspects (despite the reality that I am sometimes EXCELLENT in one or more of them). I have aspirations concerning all of those things, but not necessarily by the approach others have claimed I SHOULD.
-Mel-