IRS Asked Pro-Life Group for the Content of Their Prayers

Two hot topics for the price of one

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
East of Eden
Under Suspension
Posts: 7032
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

IRS Asked Pro-Life Group for the Content of Their Prayers

Post #1

Post by East of Eden »

http://washingtonexaminer.com/congressm ... le/2529924

Anybody not think this is a gross violation of the separation of church and state?

And some wonder why people worry about a tyrannical government.
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE

User avatar
100%atheist
Prodigy
Posts: 2601
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 10:27 pm

Post #41

Post by 100%atheist »

East of Eden wrote:
100%atheist wrote:
East of Eden wrote: Your inability to interpret a poll has nothing to do with my character. If you don't think the fact 23% of liberals don't think cheating on taxes is a moral issue (compared to 8% of conservatives) is significant, than that says a lot about your character. If the question is so irrelevant why did the pollsters ask it?
I don't think it is very interesting to play misinterpretation games. Note that I am not the first one who pointed out that "not a moral issue" does NOT mean "morally okay".
That is your opinion, which I reject.
I personally think that this is not a moral issue AND that everyone MUST not lie about their income. If you don't understand this, no one can help you because you seem to refuse any help (especially from evil liberasts).
It seems that in order to promote radical conservative agenda, ultra-conservatives are lying at every corner. I truly believe in my heart that this is the truth.
So you call someone a liar, and can't man up and back it up. That says a lot about you and your fellow ultra-liberal radicals.
Reading your responses, I now think that the only teachable lesson of our [attempted] conversation is dftt.

User avatar
otseng
Savant
Posts: 20801
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Has thanked: 211 times
Been thanked: 361 times
Contact:

Post #42

Post by otseng »

100%atheist wrote: I don't even think that such lack of integrity is characteristic of a Christian. I think it is just your personal rotten character
:warning: Moderator Warning


This is considered a personal attack and would be against the rules.

Please review our Rules.

______________

Moderator warnings count as a strike against users. Additional violations in the future may warrant a final warning. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.

Bust Nak
Savant
Posts: 9874
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:03 am
Location: Planet Earth
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 266 times

Post #43

Post by Bust Nak »

bjs wrote: At least in my country there are countless opportunities for someone to cheat on his taxes with no reasonable expectation of being caught. Fear of punishment might limit how much someone cheats, but that alone certainly would not prevent someone from cheating at all.
Fear of punishment is but one factor. The point was there are unwanted consequences, which might or might not have anything to do with the law, even for things that you think is OK.
If someone thinks it is okay to cheat on his taxes then it is unrealistic to suggest that this person will never cheat on his taxes. That is no practical difference between saying someone thinks it is okay to cheat on his taxes and saying that someone cheats on his taxes.
I am not suggesting such a thing. What I am suggesting is thinking it's okay to cheat is not an indication that one would cheat. It's obvious if you flip it round, right? Is there any practical difference between saying someone thinks it is wrong to cheat on his taxes and saying that someone would not cheat on his taxes? Thinking is wrong is not an indication that one wouldn't cheat, right?

As an aside, can you confirm one way or the other, whether treating something as "not a moral issue" mean "morally okay" as EoE suggest?
East of Eden wrote: That is your opinion, which I reject.
It's hardly a matter of opinion. The poll said 6% vs 4% thinks it's morally acceptible to cheat, that should have been the end of it.

Can you offer some justification for yout case, or counter-argument to our justication for thinking not a moral issure doesn't mean morally acceptable?

User avatar
East of Eden
Under Suspension
Posts: 7032
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Post #44

Post by East of Eden »

100%atheist wrote:
East of Eden wrote:
100%atheist wrote:
East of Eden wrote: Your inability to interpret a poll has nothing to do with my character. If you don't think the fact 23% of liberals don't think cheating on taxes is a moral issue (compared to 8% of conservatives) is significant, than that says a lot about your character. If the question is so irrelevant why did the pollsters ask it?
I don't think it is very interesting to play misinterpretation games. Note that I am not the first one who pointed out that "not a moral issue" does NOT mean "morally okay".
That is your opinion, which I reject.
I personally think that this is not a moral issue AND that everyone MUST not lie about their income. If you don't understand this, no one can help you because you seem to refuse any help (especially from evil liberasts).
It seems that in order to promote radical conservative agenda, ultra-conservatives are lying at every corner. I truly believe in my heart that this is the truth.
So you call someone a liar, and can't man up and back it up. That says a lot about you and your fellow ultra-liberal radicals.
Reading your responses, I now think that the only teachable lesson of our [attempted] conversation is dftt.
Finally something we can agree on.
;)
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE

User avatar
McCulloch
Site Supporter
Posts: 24063
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Toronto, ON, CA
Been thanked: 3 times

Post #45

Post by McCulloch »

:warning: Moderator Warning


Please review our Rules and Guidelines on preaching.

East of Eden wrote: That says a lot about you and your fellow ultra-liberal radicals.
If someone does not claim to be something, do not impose a label on that person.
100%atheist wrote: I now think that the only teachable lesson of our [attempted] conversation is dftt. [Dont Feed The Trolls]
Personal attacks of any sort are not allowed. Comments about any person that are negative, condescending, frivolous or indicate in any way a lack of respect are not allowed.


To both: try to stay on topic. We are debating issues not personalities.

______________

Moderator warnings count as a strike against users. Additional violations in the future may warrant a final warning. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John

Post Reply