http://washingtonexaminer.com/congressm ... le/2529924
Anybody not think this is a gross violation of the separation of church and state?
And some wonder why people worry about a tyrannical government.
IRS Asked Pro-Life Group for the Content of Their Prayers
Moderator: Moderators
- East of Eden
- Under Suspension
- Posts: 7032
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
IRS Asked Pro-Life Group for the Content of Their Prayers
Post #1"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE
- 100%atheist
- Prodigy
- Posts: 2601
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 10:27 pm
Post #41
Reading your responses, I now think that the only teachable lesson of our [attempted] conversation is dftt.East of Eden wrote:That is your opinion, which I reject.100%atheist wrote:I don't think it is very interesting to play misinterpretation games. Note that I am not the first one who pointed out that "not a moral issue" does NOT mean "morally okay".East of Eden wrote: Your inability to interpret a poll has nothing to do with my character. If you don't think the fact 23% of liberals don't think cheating on taxes is a moral issue (compared to 8% of conservatives) is significant, than that says a lot about your character. If the question is so irrelevant why did the pollsters ask it?
I personally think that this is not a moral issue AND that everyone MUST not lie about their income. If you don't understand this, no one can help you because you seem to refuse any help (especially from evil liberasts).
So you call someone a liar, and can't man up and back it up. That says a lot about you and your fellow ultra-liberal radicals.It seems that in order to promote radical conservative agenda, ultra-conservatives are lying at every corner. I truly believe in my heart that this is the truth.
- otseng
- Savant
- Posts: 20801
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
- Has thanked: 211 times
- Been thanked: 361 times
- Contact:
Post #42
100%atheist wrote: I don't even think that such lack of integrity is characteristic of a Christian. I think it is just your personal rotten character

This is considered a personal attack and would be against the rules.
Please review our Rules.
______________
Moderator warnings count as a strike against users. Additional violations in the future may warrant a final warning. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.
-
- Savant
- Posts: 9874
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:03 am
- Location: Planet Earth
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 266 times
Post #43
Fear of punishment is but one factor. The point was there are unwanted consequences, which might or might not have anything to do with the law, even for things that you think is OK.bjs wrote: At least in my country there are countless opportunities for someone to cheat on his taxes with no reasonable expectation of being caught. Fear of punishment might limit how much someone cheats, but that alone certainly would not prevent someone from cheating at all.
I am not suggesting such a thing. What I am suggesting is thinking it's okay to cheat is not an indication that one would cheat. It's obvious if you flip it round, right? Is there any practical difference between saying someone thinks it is wrong to cheat on his taxes and saying that someone would not cheat on his taxes? Thinking is wrong is not an indication that one wouldn't cheat, right?If someone thinks it is okay to cheat on his taxes then it is unrealistic to suggest that this person will never cheat on his taxes. That is no practical difference between saying someone thinks it is okay to cheat on his taxes and saying that someone cheats on his taxes.
As an aside, can you confirm one way or the other, whether treating something as "not a moral issue" mean "morally okay" as EoE suggest?
It's hardly a matter of opinion. The poll said 6% vs 4% thinks it's morally acceptible to cheat, that should have been the end of it.East of Eden wrote: That is your opinion, which I reject.
Can you offer some justification for yout case, or counter-argument to our justication for thinking not a moral issure doesn't mean morally acceptable?
- East of Eden
- Under Suspension
- Posts: 7032
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
Post #44
Finally something we can agree on.100%atheist wrote:Reading your responses, I now think that the only teachable lesson of our [attempted] conversation is dftt.East of Eden wrote:That is your opinion, which I reject.100%atheist wrote:I don't think it is very interesting to play misinterpretation games. Note that I am not the first one who pointed out that "not a moral issue" does NOT mean "morally okay".East of Eden wrote: Your inability to interpret a poll has nothing to do with my character. If you don't think the fact 23% of liberals don't think cheating on taxes is a moral issue (compared to 8% of conservatives) is significant, than that says a lot about your character. If the question is so irrelevant why did the pollsters ask it?
I personally think that this is not a moral issue AND that everyone MUST not lie about their income. If you don't understand this, no one can help you because you seem to refuse any help (especially from evil liberasts).
So you call someone a liar, and can't man up and back it up. That says a lot about you and your fellow ultra-liberal radicals.It seems that in order to promote radical conservative agenda, ultra-conservatives are lying at every corner. I truly believe in my heart that this is the truth.

"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE
- McCulloch
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24063
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
- Location: Toronto, ON, CA
- Been thanked: 3 times
Post #45

Please review our Rules and Guidelines on preaching.
If someone does not claim to be something, do not impose a label on that person.East of Eden wrote: That says a lot about you and your fellow ultra-liberal radicals.
Personal attacks of any sort are not allowed. Comments about any person that are negative, condescending, frivolous or indicate in any way a lack of respect are not allowed.100%atheist wrote: I now think that the only teachable lesson of our [attempted] conversation is dftt. [Dont Feed The Trolls]
To both: try to stay on topic. We are debating issues not personalities.
______________
Moderator warnings count as a strike against users. Additional violations in the future may warrant a final warning. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John