On The Pledge Of Allegience
Moderator: Moderators
-
JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2573 times
On The Pledge Of Allegience
Post #1Why is it so necessary to include the words "under God" in the pledge? The addition of these words into the pledge force many people to be unable to pledge their allegience to their own nation. Why is it more important to have a devisive term in a pledge that declares we are indivisible?
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin
-Punkinhead Martin
-
JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2573 times
Post #161
From Post 160:
Looks that way. Have you never heard the phrase, "Do as I say, not as I do"? Hypocrisy seems to be part of the human condition, theist and atheist alike.East of Eden wrote:The same people who wrote the Constitution violated it with the US seal???joeyknuccione wrote: Violating the Constitution is violating it, regardless of when it happened.
Exactly, when an ancient idea is no longer useful we should discard it, and not appeal to it simply because it's "tradition" or some such.East of Eden wrote:The age of an idea has nothing to do with its truth.joeyknuccione wrote: That said, I'm not much for requiring folks in the here and now to abide by the edicts of the ancients.
Fair 'nuff. My point is that when we place references to a god on our government institutions and such we move towards theocracy.East of Eden wrote:Mentioning God isn't theology.joeyknuccione wrote: We gotta decide for ourselves whether we will allow theology to be the law of the land or not.
