Italy and the Cross

Two hot topics for the price of one

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
cholland
Sage
Posts: 882
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:49 pm

Italy and the Cross

Post #1

Post by cholland »

See Wall Street Journal article here.

Should crosses or any other religious symbols be allowed in public schools?

User avatar
Coyotero
Scholar
Posts: 417
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 1:41 pm
Location: Tempe, Arizona

Post #2

Post by Coyotero »

Religious symbols on display in a school (I.E.: Crosses on display on walls, statues, etc.): Absolutely should not be allowed.

Religious symbols worn by students: Absolutely should be allowed.

I'm on the fence about teachers wearing them. I'll get back to you.

User avatar
McCulloch
Site Supporter
Posts: 24063
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Toronto, ON, CA
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Italy and the Cross

Post #3

Post by McCulloch »

cholland wrote:Should crosses or any other religious symbols be allowed in public schools?
Public schools are agencies of the state for the purpose of providing education. As such they should not explicitly or implicitly be promoting or suppressing religion. Staff members and students should be allowed to follow the dictates of their respective faiths in their dress, neither prevented nor encouraged by the school. Staff who choose to wear distinctly religious costumes should do so with sensitivity and in such a way as it is as inclusive as possible. There should be no, "I'm dress this way because I believe in the perfect God; those who don't dress this way are evil" either expressed directly or implied.
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John

shakes
Student
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 3:33 pm

Re: Italy and the Cross

Post #4

Post by shakes »

McCulloch wrote:
cholland wrote:Should crosses or any other religious symbols be allowed in public schools?
Public schools are agencies of the state for the purpose of providing education. As such they should not explicitly or implicitly be promoting or suppressing religion. Staff members and students should be allowed to follow the dictates of their respective faiths in their dress, neither prevented nor encouraged by the school. Staff who choose to wear distinctly religious costumes should do so with sensitivity and in such a way as it is as inclusive as possible. There should be no, "I'm dress this way because I believe in the perfect God; those who don't dress this way are evil" either expressed directly or implied.
A public school teacher is an agent of the state? Religious costumes? Inclusive religious costumes? Dude, you are high.

Personally, I think every public schoolroom in America should have not only a crucifix on the wall, but a statue of the Virgin Mary. Every teacher should have to wear vestments, and the only topic under discussion should be the sin of masterbation. How else are we to get control of the situation? A simple cross won't do, it must be the bleeding image of the suffering Jesus. I put one in my shower, just in case.

User avatar
Coyotero
Scholar
Posts: 417
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 1:41 pm
Location: Tempe, Arizona

Re: Italy and the Cross

Post #5

Post by Coyotero »

shakes wrote:
Personally, I think every public schoolroom in America should have not only a crucifix on the wall, but a statue of the Virgin Mary. Every teacher should have to wear vestments, and the only topic under discussion should be the sin of masterbation. How else are we to get control of the situation? A simple cross won't do, it must be the bleeding image of the suffering Jesus. I put one in my shower, just in case.
I must have been here too long, because I can't tell if this is sarcasm or not.

Post Reply