I heard this on the radio a couple of days ago; if Sonia Sotomayor is confirmed to the Supreme Court, six of the nine Justices will be Roman Catholics.
I don't see this as a problem - I couldn't tell you who the five Catholics are on the Court now - but it does seem odd that no one has even mentioned it (for the record, the guy on the radio didn't see it as a problem either; like me, he was just puzzled that it hasn't been a news story).
Any comments?
Religious makeup of the Supreme Court
Moderator: Moderators
- East of Eden
- Under Suspension
- Posts: 7032
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
Re: Religious makeup of the Supreme Court
Post #11Agreed. We need term limits badly. You can't tell me out of 300 million people there are only the same 535 people qualified to serve in Congress.cnorman18 wrote: The one failure to match the demographics of the American people on the part of Government officials that I find most troubling - though not in the case of the judicial branch - is that they are virtually all attorneys. The Founders seem to have conceived of the Congress, at least, as a body consisting of citizen representatives, not of professional politicians who would spend their entire lives in public service.
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE
Re: Religious makeup of the Supreme Court
Post #12I'm sincerely glad to see that there is something upon which we agree.East of Eden wrote:Agreed. We need term limits badly. You can't tell me out of 300 million people there are only the same 535 people qualified to serve in Congress.cnorman18 wrote:
The one failure to match the demographics of the American people on the part of Government officials that I find most troubling - though not in the case of the judicial branch - is that they are virtually all attorneys. The Founders seem to have conceived of the Congress, at least, as a body consisting of citizen representatives, not of professional politicians who would spend their entire lives in public service.
- East of Eden
- Under Suspension
- Posts: 7032
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
Re: Religious makeup of the Supreme Court
Post #13Other than religion, there's probably a lot.cnorman18 wrote:I'm sincerely glad to see that there is something upon which we agree.East of Eden wrote:Agreed. We need term limits badly. You can't tell me out of 300 million people there are only the same 535 people qualified to serve in Congress.cnorman18 wrote:
The one failure to match the demographics of the American people on the part of Government officials that I find most troubling - though not in the case of the judicial branch - is that they are virtually all attorneys. The Founders seem to have conceived of the Congress, at least, as a body consisting of citizen representatives, not of professional politicians who would spend their entire lives in public service.
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE
Re: Religious makeup of the Supreme Court
Post #14I don't doubt it. On some hot-button issues, I lean middle or left - I'm pro-choice (with reservations), anti-school prayer, and am not opposed to gay marriage - but I am a true independent, and on many other issues I am on the right or even the far right. I am pro-military, anti-bailouts, and on the Second Amendment I'm John Effing Wayne. To me the common element is a commitment to individual liberty and a severe limitation on what is and is not the Government's business. .East of Eden wrote:Other than religion, there's probably a lot.cnorman18 wrote:I'm sincerely glad to see that there is something upon which we agree.East of Eden wrote:Agreed. We need term limits badly. You can't tell me out of 300 million people there are only the same 535 people qualified to serve in Congress.cnorman18 wrote:
The one failure to match the demographics of the American people on the part of Government officials that I find most troubling - though not in the case of the judicial branch - is that they are virtually all attorneys. The Founders seem to have conceived of the Congress, at least, as a body consisting of citizen representatives, not of professional politicians who would spend their entire lives in public service.
I also believe in the right of others to disagree, and not to have my own beliefs forced upon them just as their beliefs ought not be forced upon anyone else.
- East of Eden
- Under Suspension
- Posts: 7032
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
Re: Religious makeup of the Supreme Court
Post #15Yes, the 2A guarantees all the others. I was at the NRA convention in Phoenix last month.cnorman18 wrote:I am pro-military, anti-bailouts, and on the Second Amendment I'm John Effing Wayne.
I disagree with your school prayer stance, but I see where you're coming from based on the above.To me the common element is a commitment to individual liberty and a severe limitation on what is and is not the Government's business. .
I also believe in the right of others to disagree, and not to have my own beliefs forced upon them just as their beliefs ought not be forced upon anyone else.
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE
Re: Religious makeup of the Supreme Court
Post #16Perhaps we can leave it there, then. People of good will can disagree on many things.East of Eden wrote:Yes, the 2A guarantees all the others. I was at the NRA convention in Phoenix last month.cnorman18 wrote:I am pro-military, anti-bailouts, and on the Second Amendment I'm John Effing Wayne.I disagree with your school prayer stance, but I see where you're coming from based on the above.To me the common element is a commitment to individual liberty and a severe limitation on what is and is not the Government's business. .
I also believe in the right of others to disagree, and not to have my own beliefs forced upon them just as their beliefs ought not be forced upon anyone else.
- McCulloch
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24063
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
- Location: Toronto, ON, CA
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Religious makeup of the Supreme Court
Post #17Moderator Notice
When the moderators feel the rules have been violated, a notice will frequently occur within the thread where the violation occurred, pointing out the violation and perhaps providing other moderator comments. Moderator warnings and comments are made publicly, within the thread, so that all members may see when and how the rules are being interpreted and enforced. However, note that any challenges or replies to moderator comments or warnings should be made via Private Message. This is so that threads do not get derailed into discussions about the rules.
I think we have in the past taken members to task for "euphemistic profanity" and I suppose the "John Effing Wayne" has to fit in to that category. Maybe "John guns blazing"cnorman18 wrote:[...] and on the Second Amendment I'm John Effing Wayne.
When the moderators feel the rules have been violated, a notice will frequently occur within the thread where the violation occurred, pointing out the violation and perhaps providing other moderator comments. Moderator warnings and comments are made publicly, within the thread, so that all members may see when and how the rules are being interpreted and enforced. However, note that any challenges or replies to moderator comments or warnings should be made via Private Message. This is so that threads do not get derailed into discussions about the rules.
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
Re: Religious makeup of the Supreme Court
Post #18I apologize. I know better, and I should have expressed myself without the veiled obscenity.McCulloch wrote:Moderator Notice
I think we have in the past taken members to task for "euphemistic profanity" and I suppose the "John Effing Wayne" has to fit in to that category. Maybe "John guns blazing"cnorman18 wrote:[...] and on the Second Amendment I'm John Effing Wayne.