Religious makeup of the Supreme Court

Two hot topics for the price of one

Moderator: Moderators

cnorman18

Religious makeup of the Supreme Court

Post #1

Post by cnorman18 »

I heard this on the radio a couple of days ago; if Sonia Sotomayor is confirmed to the Supreme Court, six of the nine Justices will be Roman Catholics.

I don't see this as a problem - I couldn't tell you who the five Catholics are on the Court now - but it does seem odd that no one has even mentioned it (for the record, the guy on the radio didn't see it as a problem either; like me, he was just puzzled that it hasn't been a news story).

Any comments?

User avatar
East of Eden
Under Suspension
Posts: 7032
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Re: Religious makeup of the Supreme Court

Post #11

Post by East of Eden »

cnorman18 wrote: The one failure to match the demographics of the American people on the part of Government officials that I find most troubling - though not in the case of the judicial branch - is that they are virtually all attorneys. The Founders seem to have conceived of the Congress, at least, as a body consisting of citizen representatives, not of professional politicians who would spend their entire lives in public service.
Agreed. We need term limits badly. You can't tell me out of 300 million people there are only the same 535 people qualified to serve in Congress.
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE

cnorman18

Re: Religious makeup of the Supreme Court

Post #12

Post by cnorman18 »

East of Eden wrote:
cnorman18 wrote:
The one failure to match the demographics of the American people on the part of Government officials that I find most troubling - though not in the case of the judicial branch - is that they are virtually all attorneys. The Founders seem to have conceived of the Congress, at least, as a body consisting of citizen representatives, not of professional politicians who would spend their entire lives in public service.
Agreed. We need term limits badly. You can't tell me out of 300 million people there are only the same 535 people qualified to serve in Congress.
I'm sincerely glad to see that there is something upon which we agree.

User avatar
East of Eden
Under Suspension
Posts: 7032
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Re: Religious makeup of the Supreme Court

Post #13

Post by East of Eden »

cnorman18 wrote:
East of Eden wrote:
cnorman18 wrote:
The one failure to match the demographics of the American people on the part of Government officials that I find most troubling - though not in the case of the judicial branch - is that they are virtually all attorneys. The Founders seem to have conceived of the Congress, at least, as a body consisting of citizen representatives, not of professional politicians who would spend their entire lives in public service.
Agreed. We need term limits badly. You can't tell me out of 300 million people there are only the same 535 people qualified to serve in Congress.
I'm sincerely glad to see that there is something upon which we agree.
Other than religion, there's probably a lot.
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE

cnorman18

Re: Religious makeup of the Supreme Court

Post #14

Post by cnorman18 »

East of Eden wrote:
cnorman18 wrote:
East of Eden wrote:
cnorman18 wrote:
The one failure to match the demographics of the American people on the part of Government officials that I find most troubling - though not in the case of the judicial branch - is that they are virtually all attorneys. The Founders seem to have conceived of the Congress, at least, as a body consisting of citizen representatives, not of professional politicians who would spend their entire lives in public service.
Agreed. We need term limits badly. You can't tell me out of 300 million people there are only the same 535 people qualified to serve in Congress.
I'm sincerely glad to see that there is something upon which we agree.
Other than religion, there's probably a lot.
I don't doubt it. On some hot-button issues, I lean middle or left - I'm pro-choice (with reservations), anti-school prayer, and am not opposed to gay marriage - but I am a true independent, and on many other issues I am on the right or even the far right. I am pro-military, anti-bailouts, and on the Second Amendment I'm John Effing Wayne. To me the common element is a commitment to individual liberty and a severe limitation on what is and is not the Government's business. .

I also believe in the right of others to disagree, and not to have my own beliefs forced upon them just as their beliefs ought not be forced upon anyone else.

User avatar
East of Eden
Under Suspension
Posts: 7032
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Re: Religious makeup of the Supreme Court

Post #15

Post by East of Eden »

cnorman18 wrote:I am pro-military, anti-bailouts, and on the Second Amendment I'm John Effing Wayne.
Yes, the 2A guarantees all the others. I was at the NRA convention in Phoenix last month.
To me the common element is a commitment to individual liberty and a severe limitation on what is and is not the Government's business. .

I also believe in the right of others to disagree, and not to have my own beliefs forced upon them just as their beliefs ought not be forced upon anyone else.
I disagree with your school prayer stance, but I see where you're coming from based on the above.
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE

cnorman18

Re: Religious makeup of the Supreme Court

Post #16

Post by cnorman18 »

East of Eden wrote:
cnorman18 wrote:I am pro-military, anti-bailouts, and on the Second Amendment I'm John Effing Wayne.
Yes, the 2A guarantees all the others. I was at the NRA convention in Phoenix last month.
To me the common element is a commitment to individual liberty and a severe limitation on what is and is not the Government's business. .

I also believe in the right of others to disagree, and not to have my own beliefs forced upon them just as their beliefs ought not be forced upon anyone else.
I disagree with your school prayer stance, but I see where you're coming from based on the above.
Perhaps we can leave it there, then. People of good will can disagree on many things.

User avatar
McCulloch
Site Supporter
Posts: 24063
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Toronto, ON, CA
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Religious makeup of the Supreme Court

Post #17

Post by McCulloch »

Moderator Notice
cnorman18 wrote:[...] and on the Second Amendment I'm John Effing Wayne.
I think we have in the past taken members to task for "euphemistic profanity" and I suppose the "John Effing Wayne" has to fit in to that category. Maybe "John guns blazing"

When the moderators feel the rules have been violated, a notice will frequently occur within the thread where the violation occurred, pointing out the violation and perhaps providing other moderator comments. Moderator warnings and comments are made publicly, within the thread, so that all members may see when and how the rules are being interpreted and enforced. However, note that any challenges or replies to moderator comments or warnings should be made via Private Message. This is so that threads do not get derailed into discussions about the rules.
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John

cnorman18

Re: Religious makeup of the Supreme Court

Post #18

Post by cnorman18 »

McCulloch wrote:Moderator Notice
cnorman18 wrote:[...] and on the Second Amendment I'm John Effing Wayne.
I think we have in the past taken members to task for "euphemistic profanity" and I suppose the "John Effing Wayne" has to fit in to that category. Maybe "John guns blazing"
I apologize. I know better, and I should have expressed myself without the veiled obscenity.

Post Reply