World Gifting Comparison

Two hot topics for the price of one

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
achilles12604
Site Supporter
Posts: 3697
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 3:37 am
Location: Colorado

World Gifting Comparison

Post #1

Post by achilles12604 »

In another thread it suggested that the world's largest charity was run by and funded by an Atheist. It was also suggested that the U.S., by virtue of it's Christian majority, gives less than other nations - some of which are more secular.

The questions for debate:
How does the charity of the U.S. population (as a percentage of their annual incomes) compare to other other wealthy democracies?
If disparities exist, can they be attributed to religious belief and practice? Why?

Thanks to Cmass for smacking me around when I was to tired to think straight.
It is a first class human tragedy that people of the earth who claim to believe in the message of Jesus, whom they describe as the Prince of Peace, show little of that belief in actual practice.

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Re: World Gifting Comparison

Post #2

Post by Goat »

achilles12604 wrote:In another thread it suggested that the world's largest charity was run by and funded by an Atheist. It was also suggested that the U.S., by virtue of it's Christian majority, gives less than other nations - some of which are more secular.

The questions for debate:
How does the charity of the U.S. population (as a percentage of their annual incomes) compare to other other wealthy democracies?
If disparities exist, can they be attributed to religious belief and practice? Why?

Thanks to Cmass for smacking me around when I was to tired to think straight.
Does giving to 'charity' include 'tithes' to the church? Is 'Tithing' to a church 'charity'?
If so, what percentage of 'tithes' go to church maintance, and what percentage goes to feeding the poor, education, clothes to the poor, etc?
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

User avatar
MagusYanam
Guru
Posts: 1562
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 12:57 pm
Location: Providence, RI (East Side)

Post #3

Post by MagusYanam »

This came up when I did a Google search for charity in developed nations. The standard is the ODA index, which is defined as:
The net official development assistance (ODA) from Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) nations to developing countries and multilateral organizations. ODA is defined as financial assistance that is concessional in character, has the main objective to promote economic development and welfare of the less developed countries (LDCs), and contains a grant element of at least 25%. The entry does not cover other official flows (OOF) or private flows. Per capita figures expressed per 1 population.
Hmm... it looks like Luxembourg is at the top of the list, and Luxembourg is mostly Catholic, I think; then come Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands and Sweden, all of which are largely secular-ish Protestant.

The United States doesn't come off looking too good... but hey, at least we're beating Italy and South Korea!
If I am capable of grasping God objectively, I do not believe, but precisely because I cannot do this I must believe.

- Søren Kierkegaard

My blog

User avatar
micatala
Site Supporter
Posts: 8338
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 2:04 pm

Post #4

Post by micatala »

MagusYanam wrote:This came up when I did a Google search for charity in developed nations. The standard is the ODA index, which is defined as:
The net official development assistance (ODA) from Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) nations to developing countries and multilateral organizations. ODA is defined as financial assistance that is concessional in character, has the main objective to promote economic development and welfare of the less developed countries (LDCs), and contains a grant element of at least 25%. The entry does not cover other official flows (OOF) or private flows. Per capita figures expressed per 1 population.
Hmm... it looks like Luxembourg is at the top of the list, and Luxembourg is mostly Catholic, I think; then come Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands and Sweden, all of which are largely secular-ish Protestant.

The United States doesn't come off looking too good... but hey, at least we're beating Italy and South Korea!
Looking per GDP dollar instead of per capita, we are next to last, beating only Iceland.

Even in total terms, we are fourth, trailing Japan, UK, and France.

However, as the comments at the site indicate, the definition of what is counted is important and does not include private giving. For another view, see:

http://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseact ... ls&id=3712

There is a summary and a link to the full article.

At this point, it seems to me the picture is more complicated than presented by the link given by Magus. Yes, the U.S. Government aid is lower than others. Yes, a lot of the aid the U.S. government gives is military aid or aid arguably given more for political purposes than economic development purposes (e.g. Israel and Egypt). However, it is also true that private giving from the U.S. is significant. At this point, I have not waded through what has been cited so far to see how we might stack up if the private giving is taken into account. The U.S. may certainly still be 'behind' but at this point I am not prepared to jump to that conclusion.
" . . . the line separating good and evil passes, not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties either, but right through every human heart . . . ." Alexander Solzhenitsyn

User avatar
MagusYanam
Guru
Posts: 1562
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 12:57 pm
Location: Providence, RI (East Side)

Post #5

Post by MagusYanam »

micatala wrote:At this point, it seems to me the picture is more complicated than presented by the link given by Magus. Yes, the U.S. Government aid is lower than others. Yes, a lot of the aid the U.S. government gives is military aid or aid arguably given more for political purposes than economic development purposes (e.g. Israel and Egypt). However, it is also true that private giving from the U.S. is significant. At this point, I have not waded through what has been cited so far to see how we might stack up if the private giving is taken into account. The U.S. may certainly still be 'behind' but at this point I am not prepared to jump to that conclusion.
Good point, micatala. I thought the NationMaster website was a good place to start, but you're right in that it isn't the be-all, end-all in this debate (I didn't really intend it to be).

As to giving through the private sector (what does that mean, anyway? Giving through businesses, or as private citizens? Where does charity through civil society organisations like churches, clubs, unions and other NGO's fit in?), I think some more research needs to be done. The ODA index does have its usefulness, to be sure, but I think the parameters need to be more carefully defined to get a clearer picture of what charity actually looks like.
If I am capable of grasping God objectively, I do not believe, but precisely because I cannot do this I must believe.

- Søren Kierkegaard

My blog

User avatar
achilles12604
Site Supporter
Posts: 3697
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 3:37 am
Location: Colorado

Post #6

Post by achilles12604 »

Edit


So if personal giving in the US is measured at $62 Billion, How much is that per capita?

206.66 per capita. So the people of the US give more than Sweden, the UK, France and is only behind 4 other countries GOVTS.

That is pretty sweet.

Should we add the personal giving to the Govt giving I wonder? Na. We would be in the same (5th) place. We wont bother. Our people are fine on their own.


#1 Luxembourg: $490.59 per capita
#2 Denmark: $389.53 per capita
#3 Norway: $302.51 per capita
#4 Netherlands: $241.39 per capita

US PEOPLE HERE 206.66

#5 Sweden: $188.24 per capita
#6 United Kingdom: $176.06 per capita
#7 Finland: $162.36 per capita
#8 Ireland: $147.72 per capita
#9 Switzerland: $145.61 per capita
#10 Belgium: $103.15 per capita
#11 Austria: $83.05 per capita
#12 Canada: $77.87 per capita
#13 Japan: $69.84 per capita
#14 Germany: $67.96 per capita
#15 Australia: $43.75 per capita
#16 Spain: $32.88 per capita
#17 Portugal: $25.46 per capita
#18 United States: $22.91 per capita
#19 Iceland: $22.19 per capita
#20 Italy: $17.20 per capita
#21 Korea, South: $15.17 per capita
It is a first class human tragedy that people of the earth who claim to believe in the message of Jesus, whom they describe as the Prince of Peace, show little of that belief in actual practice.

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Post #7

Post by Goat »

achilles12604 wrote:Edit


So if personal giving in the US is measured at $62 Billion, How much is that per capita?

206.66 per capita. So the people of the US give more than Sweden, the UK, France and is only behind 4 other countries GOVTS.

That is pretty sweet.

Should we add the personal giving to the Govt giving I wonder? Na. We would be in the same (5th) place. We wont bother. Our people are fine on their own.


#1 Luxembourg: $490.59 per capita
#2 Denmark: $389.53 per capita
#3 Norway: $302.51 per capita
#4 Netherlands: $241.39 per capita

US PEOPLE HERE 206.66

#5 Sweden: $188.24 per capita
#6 United Kingdom: $176.06 per capita
#7 Finland: $162.36 per capita
#8 Ireland: $147.72 per capita
#9 Switzerland: $145.61 per capita
#10 Belgium: $103.15 per capita
#11 Austria: $83.05 per capita
#12 Canada: $77.87 per capita
#13 Japan: $69.84 per capita
#14 Germany: $67.96 per capita
#15 Australia: $43.75 per capita
#16 Spain: $32.88 per capita
#17 Portugal: $25.46 per capita
#18 United States: $22.91 per capita
#19 Iceland: $22.19 per capita
#20 Italy: $17.20 per capita
#21 Korea, South: $15.17 per capita
For a true comparison, you have to add the personal giving and the government giving of all nations.

Then.. you have to factor in the average yearly income, and figure out the percentage of yearly income.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

User avatar
achilles12604
Site Supporter
Posts: 3697
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 3:37 am
Location: Colorado

Post #8

Post by achilles12604 »

goat wrote:
achilles12604 wrote:Edit


So if personal giving in the US is measured at $62 Billion, How much is that per capita?

206.66 per capita. So the people of the US give more than Sweden, the UK, France and is only behind 4 other countries GOVTS.

That is pretty sweet.

Should we add the personal giving to the Govt giving I wonder? Na. We would be in the same (5th) place. We wont bother. Our people are fine on their own.


#1 Luxembourg: $490.59 per capita
#2 Denmark: $389.53 per capita
#3 Norway: $302.51 per capita
#4 Netherlands: $241.39 per capita

US PEOPLE HERE 206.66

#5 Sweden: $188.24 per capita
#6 United Kingdom: $176.06 per capita
#7 Finland: $162.36 per capita
#8 Ireland: $147.72 per capita
#9 Switzerland: $145.61 per capita
#10 Belgium: $103.15 per capita
#11 Austria: $83.05 per capita
#12 Canada: $77.87 per capita
#13 Japan: $69.84 per capita
#14 Germany: $67.96 per capita
#15 Australia: $43.75 per capita
#16 Spain: $32.88 per capita
#17 Portugal: $25.46 per capita
#18 United States: $22.91 per capita
#19 Iceland: $22.19 per capita
#20 Italy: $17.20 per capita
#21 Korea, South: $15.17 per capita
For a true comparison, you have to add the personal giving and the government giving of all nations.

Then.. you have to factor in the average yearly income, and figure out the percentage of yearly income.
Well . . . . . . get started. O:)
It is a first class human tragedy that people of the earth who claim to believe in the message of Jesus, whom they describe as the Prince of Peace, show little of that belief in actual practice.

Post Reply