ilovepikachuandjesus wrote:Confused wrote:Most I hear from on this forum equate hell as more of the absence of any relationship with God. This opens a whole new can of worms since communication with God (in the physical sense) seems to have stopped 2007 years ago. However, others might tell you that communication continues on a personal level in terms of "feeling" the presence or answer of God.
I might be wrong because I haven't gotten around to studying the theological aspects of Hell in depth yet.
However, from my current understanding using the absence of God debate you posed. Those in Hell will have seen God in his glory and been forced into bending their knee to Him as He judges their sin and then forces them into the absence of Himself. Therefore those who are in His absence will have known what it was like to have been in His eternal glory. That is in itself punishment enough.
Disclaimer: I am happy to be corrected by a better thelogian who has put more time and Spirit into the study of Hell.
Interesting. I haven't heard of the bending knee part. It was my understanding that Christ states:
Matthew 7:21"Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22Many will say to me on that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?' 23Then I will tell them plainly, 'I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!'
Matthew 10:32"Whoever acknowledges me before men, I will also acknowledge him before my Father in heaven. 33But whoever disowns me before men, I will disown him before my Father in heaven.
This implies Christ will turn His back on those, not force them to their knees. I would be interested in knowing where your interpretation comes from.