The meek inherit ?

[Bobcat]

Christians think the meek inherit the earth but in truth the meek shall inherit the land.

Christians misunderstand scripture!

If you wish to inherit the land you must be freed by the son and walk in the law of the LORD.

The land is not the earth either.

Do you or have you ever walked in the law of the LORD?

[onewithhim]

The Scripture says plainly that the righteous will inherit the earth/land and live on it forever. How else do you understand these verses?

"For evildoers will be cut off but those that wait upon the LORD, they shall inherit the earth....The meek shall inherit the earth; and shall delight themselves in the abundance of peace....The righteous shall inherit the land and dwell therein forever." (Psalm 37:9,11,29, KJV)

Your own examples say that "land" and "earth" are the same thing, and people will be living on the earth forever. And you said that "human society" is not one of the definitions of "earth?" Your own listing says that "the inhabited earth is the abode of men and animals." So the Bible does mention a human society living on the earth forever. (See your 1b.)

Any comment Capbook?

Human society refers to as group of people, while earth inhabitants refers to all people or human and etc.

So does "human society" refer to earth's inhabitants. Human society = earth's inhabitants.

Human society refers to a group of people who share a common lifestyle and organization.
While earth's inhabitant refers to all inhabitants not just a small or big group.
And human society is never a lexicon definition of earth.

Human society merely refers to human beings on the earth. It need not mean that they share a common lifestyle or organization. It is the SAME as the "earth's inhabitants." Did you look at you "1b" on your list?

.

You equate land inhabitants to human society.
Does human society includes animals, some fowls and etc.?

Of course not. Let's be reasonable here.

Yes, only in land inhabitants that include animals, etc. and not human society.
Now we see the difference between the two.
And land inhabitants is one of the lexicon definition of earth that includes animals, etc.

It can also mean human society, as one of your own lists shows. See Genesis 11:1. Do animals have "one language" with humans?

[Capbook]

Any comment Capbook?

Human society refers to as group of people, while earth inhabitants refers to all people or human and etc.

So does "human society" refer to earth's inhabitants. Human society = earth's inhabitants.

Human society refers to a group of people who share a common lifestyle and organization.
While earth's inhabitant refers to all inhabitants not just a small or big group.
And human society is never a lexicon definition of earth.

Human society merely refers to human beings on the earth. It need not mean that they share a common lifestyle or organization. It is the SAME as the "earth's inhabitants." Did you look at you "1b" on your list?

.

You equate land inhabitants to human society.
Does human society includes animals, some fowls and etc.?

Of course not. Let's be reasonable here.

Yes, only in land inhabitants that include animals, etc. and not human society.
Now we see the difference between the two.
And land inhabitants is one of the lexicon definition of earth that includes animals, etc.

It can also mean human society, as one of your own lists shows. See Genesis 11:1. Do animals have "one language" with humans?

One of the list is "land inhabitants" and not "human society."
"People" as one of earth's inhabitants, why not change "human society" to people?
As "human society" defined as group of people not all people.

Human society defined as a group of people who share a common lifestyle, organization, and culture, and who are involved with each other through persistent relationships:

[onewithhim]

Human society refers to as group of people, while earth inhabitants refers to all people or human and etc.

So does "human society" refer to earth's inhabitants. Human society = earth's inhabitants.

Human society refers to a group of people who share a common lifestyle and organization.
While earth's inhabitant refers to all inhabitants not just a small or big group.
And human society is never a lexicon definition of earth.

Human society merely refers to human beings on the earth. It need not mean that they share a common lifestyle or organization. It is the SAME as the "earth's inhabitants." Did you look at you "1b" on your list?

.

You equate land inhabitants to human society.
Does human society includes animals, some fowls and etc.?

Of course not. Let's be reasonable here.

Yes, only in land inhabitants that include animals, etc. and not human society.
Now we see the difference between the two.
And land inhabitants is one of the lexicon definition of earth that includes animals, etc.

It can also mean human society, as one of your own lists shows. See Genesis 11:1. Do animals have "one language" with humans?

One of the list is "land inhabitants" and not "human society."
"People" as one of earth's inhabitants, why not change "human society" to people?

OK, I'll change "human society" to "people."

[Capbook]

So does "human society" refer to earth's inhabitants. Human society = earth's inhabitants.

Human society refers to a group of people who share a common lifestyle and organization.
While earth's inhabitant refers to all inhabitants not just a small or big group.
And human society is never a lexicon definition of earth.

Human society merely refers to human beings on the earth. It need not mean that they share a common lifestyle or organization. It is the SAME as the "earth's inhabitants." Did you look at you "1b" on your list?

.

You equate land inhabitants to human society.
Does human society includes animals, some fowls and etc.?

Of course not. Let's be reasonable here.

Yes, only in land inhabitants that include animals, etc. and not human society.
Now we see the difference between the two.
And land inhabitants is one of the lexicon definition of earth that includes animals, etc.

It can also mean human society, as one of your own lists shows. See Genesis 11:1. Do animals have "one language" with humans?

One of the list is "land inhabitants" and not "human society."
"People" as one of earth's inhabitants, why not change "human society" to people?

OK, I'll change "human society" to "people."

Good, did you not go beyond your Governing Body's belief then?

[onewithhim]

Human society refers to a group of people who share a common lifestyle and organization.
While earth's inhabitant refers to all inhabitants not just a small or big group.
And human society is never a lexicon definition of earth.

Human society merely refers to human beings on the earth. It need not mean that they share a common lifestyle or organization. It is the SAME as the "earth's inhabitants." Did you look at you "1b" on your list?

.

You equate land inhabitants to human society.
Does human society includes animals, some fowls and etc.?

Of course not. Let's be reasonable here.

Yes, only in land inhabitants that include animals, etc. and not human society.
Now we see the difference between the two.
And land inhabitants is one of the lexicon definition of earth that includes animals, etc.

It can also mean human society, as one of your own lists shows. See Genesis 11:1. Do animals have "one language" with humans?

One of the list is "land inhabitants" and not "human society."
"People" as one of earth's inhabitants, why not change "human society" to people?

OK, I'll change "human society" to "people."

Good, did you not go beyond your Governing Body's belief then?

No, not at all. How do you surmise that I am going beyond the GB's belief?

[Capbook]

Human society merely refers to human beings on the earth. It need not mean that they share a common lifestyle or organization. It is the SAME as the "earth's inhabitants." Did you look at you "1b" on your list?

.

You equate land inhabitants to human society.
Does human society includes animals, some fowls and etc.?

Of course not. Let's be reasonable here.

Yes, only in land inhabitants that include animals, etc. and not human society.
Now we see the difference between the two.
And land inhabitants is one of the lexicon definition of earth that includes animals, etc.

It can also mean human society, as one of your own lists shows. See Genesis 11:1. Do animals have "one language" with humans?

One of the list is "land inhabitants" and not "human society."
"People" as one of earth's inhabitants, why not change "human society" to people?

OK, I'll change "human society" to "people."

Good, did you not go beyond your Governing Body's belief then?

No, not at all. How do you surmise that I am going beyond the GB's belief?

Because "human society" is your interpretation of land inhabitants.
While "all people" would be an acceptable as one of the land inhabitants.

[onewithhim]

.

You equate land inhabitants to human society.
Does human society includes animals, some fowls and etc.?

Of course not. Let's be reasonable here.

Yes, only in land inhabitants that include animals, etc. and not human society.
Now we see the difference between the two.
And land inhabitants is one of the lexicon definition of earth that includes animals, etc.

It can also mean human society, as one of your own lists shows. See Genesis 11:1. Do animals have "one language" with humans?

One of the list is "land inhabitants" and not "human society."
"People" as one of earth's inhabitants, why not change "human society" to people?

OK, I'll change "human society" to "people."

Good, did you not go beyond your Governing Body's belief then?

No, not at all. How do you surmise that I am going beyond the GB's belief?

Because "human society" is your interpretation of land inhabitants.
While "all people" would be an acceptable as one of the land inhabitants.

The land inhabitants of Genesis 11:1 that speak a language are humans. Animals don't speak a language such as is referred to in the verse. I don't know what else you are trying to say. I haven't "gone beyond my Governing Body's belief."

[Capbook]

You equate land inhabitants to human society.
Does human society includes animals, some fowls and etc.?

Of course not. Let's be reasonable here.

Yes, only in land inhabitants that include animals, etc. and not human society.
Now we see the difference between the two.
And land inhabitants is one of the lexicon definition of earth that includes animals, etc.

It can also mean human society, as one of your own lists shows. See Genesis 11:1. Do animals have "one language" with humans?

One of the list is "land inhabitants" and not "human society."
"People" as one of earth's inhabitants, why not change "human society" to people?

OK, I'll change "human society" to "people."

Good, did you not go beyond your Governing Body's belief then?

No, not at all. How do you surmise that I am going beyond the GB's belief?

Because "human society" is your interpretation of land inhabitants.
While "all people" would be an acceptable as one of the land inhabitants.

The land inhabitants of Genesis 11:1 that speak a language are humans. Animals don't speak a language such as is referred to in the verse. I don't know what else you are trying to say. I haven't "gone beyond my Governing Body's belief."

Do it happen in the Bible that animal speaks?

[onewithhim]

Of course not. Let's be reasonable here.

Yes, only in land inhabitants that include animals, etc. and not human society.
Now we see the difference between the two.
And land inhabitants is one of the lexicon definition of earth that includes animals, etc.

It can also mean human society, as one of your own lists shows. See Genesis 11:1. Do animals have "one language" with humans?

One of the list is "land inhabitants" and not "human society."
"People" as one of earth's inhabitants, why not change "human society" to people?

OK, I'll change "human society" to "people."

Good, did you not go beyond your Governing Body's belief then?

No, not at all. How do you surmise that I am going beyond the GB's belief?

Because "human society" is your interpretation of land inhabitants.
While "all people" would be an acceptable as one of the land inhabitants.

The land inhabitants of Genesis 11:1 that speak a language are humans. Animals don't speak a language such as is referred to in the verse. I don't know what else you are trying to say. I haven't "gone beyond my Governing Body's belief."

Do it happen in the Bible that animal speaks?

Animals can't speak. There were a couple in the Bible that speak, a snake in the GoE, controlled by Satan, and the donkey that Barak was riding, and that was a miracle of God. No other animals speak like humans.

[Capbook]

Yes, only in land inhabitants that include animals, etc. and not human society.
Now we see the difference between the two.
And land inhabitants is one of the lexicon definition of earth that includes animals, etc.

It can also mean human society, as one of your own lists shows. See Genesis 11:1. Do animals have "one language" with humans?

One of the list is "land inhabitants" and not "human society."
"People" as one of earth's inhabitants, why not change "human society" to people?

OK, I'll change "human society" to "people."

Good, did you not go beyond your Governing Body's belief then?

No, not at all. How do you surmise that I am going beyond the GB's belief?

Because "human society" is your interpretation of land inhabitants.
While "all people" would be an acceptable as one of the land inhabitants.

The land inhabitants of Genesis 11:1 that speak a language are humans. Animals don't speak a language such as is referred to in the verse. I don't know what else you are trying to say. I haven't "gone beyond my Governing Body's belief."

Do it happen in the Bible that animal speaks?

Animals can't speak. There were a couple in the Bible that speak, a snake in the GoE, controlled by Satan, and the donkey that Barak was riding, and that was a miracle of God. No other animals speak like humans.

You have just given examples of animals that spake.
Do God don't have the power to let animals speak?