The False Doctrines of Christianity

[OneWay]

All of you are in some sort of false doctrine of Christianity.
None of you are in, or know the doctrine of Christ.

Granted some things within the doctrine you adhere to and believe
are true. But at the same token there are also things within it that
are also not true. To which renders your false doctrine useless
and meaningless to you when it is all said and done.

In this thread I will point out the various false doctrines that
has captured and enslaved you to a world of lies.

By all means feel free to debate me and present to me your false doctrine
so I can point out to you the errors that are within it for you.

I will have you flip flopping to one side of the other, contradicting
not only your false doctrine, but your own words.

[1213]

Jesus the Christ
was never ever an angel
and never ever will be one.
This is a false doctrine.

Please explain why do you think so?

[OneWay]

Jesus the Christ
was never ever an angel
and never ever will be one.
This is a false doctrine.

Please explain why do you think so?

There are many reasons, but I will give you one.
It is impossible for an angel to be born of a woman.

[tam]

Peace to you,

Jesus Christ is not God.
This is a false doctrine.
Jesus Christ was at one
time the name of God.
God has a new name.

"Jesus" was never the name of God (whose actual name is written here: Psalm 68:4)... nor the name of God's Son.

Christ was never named "Jesus" (and no one would have called Him that in His time on earth). That has never been His name. It is not an English transliteration or even a translation of His name; it does not even have the name of God (Psalm 68:4) IN His name (which even the prophets have in their names, so how much more so would the One who came in the name of His Father have His Father's name in His name?)


Peace again to you and to you all,
your servant and a slave of Christ,
tammy

[OneWay]

Peace to you,

Jesus Christ is not God.
This is a false doctrine.
Jesus Christ was at one
time the name of God.
God has a new name.

"Jesus" was never the name of God (whose actual name is written here: Psalm 68:4)... nor the name of God's Son.

Christ was never named "Jesus" (and no one would have called Him that in His time on earth). That has never been His name. It is not an English transliteration or even a translation of His name; it does not even have the name of God (Psalm 68:4) IN His name (which even the prophets have in their names, so how much more so would the One who came in the name of His Father have His Father's name in His name?)


Peace again to you and to you all,
your servant and a slave of Christ,
tammy

I challenge you to a one on one debate in the head to head debate forum on this topic.

Do you accept

Yes or no?

[tam]

[Replying to OneWay in post #14]

No. If you want to talk about it talk about it here, where you started the thread. It is not even a secret that Christ was never called "Jesus".

Peace again to you.

[OneWay]

[Replying to OneWay in post #14]

No. If you want to talk about it talk about it here, where you started the thread. It is not even a secret that Christ was never called "Jesus".

Peace again to you.

But yet you refuse to debate me over it. Why?
Is it because you do not have enough faith in what you believe?

[tam]

[Replying to OneWay in post #14]

No. If you want to talk about it talk about it here, where you started the thread. It is not even a secret that Christ was never called "Jesus".

Peace again to you.

But yet you refuse to debate me over it. Why?

Because I don't care about 'head to head' debates, and have no desire to take part in them. If you want to discuss it, just discuss it. Simple enough.


Peace again.

[OneWay]

[Replying to OneWay in post #14]

No. If you want to talk about it talk about it here, where you started the thread. It is not even a secret that Christ was never called "Jesus".

Peace again to you.

But yet you refuse to debate me over it. Why?

Because I don't care about 'head to head' debates, and have no desire to take part in them. If you want to discuss it, just discuss it. Simple enough.


Peace again.

I say your not telling the truth.
I say you know what will happen to you if you debate me.

[tam]

Peace again,

[Replying to OneWay in post #14]

No. If you want to talk about it talk about it here, where you started the thread. It is not even a secret that Christ was never called "Jesus".

Peace again to you.

But yet you refuse to debate me over it. Why?

Because I don't care about 'head to head' debates, and have no desire to take part in them. If you want to discuss it, just discuss it. Simple enough.


Peace again.

I say your not telling the truth.

Not sure why what you say should matter to me, but as you seem fond of saying to others, "Prove it". While you're at it, go ahead and prove that "Jesus Christ" is the name, not only of the Son, but also once of God.

[OneWay]

Peace again,

[Replying to OneWay in post #14]

No. If you want to talk about it talk about it here, where you started the thread. It is not even a secret that Christ was never called "Jesus".

Peace again to you.

But yet you refuse to debate me over it. Why?

Because I don't care about 'head to head' debates, and have no desire to take part in them. If you want to discuss it, just discuss it. Simple enough.


Peace again.

I say your not telling the truth.

Not sure why what you say should matter to me, but as you seem fond of saying to others, "Prove it". While you're at it, go ahead and prove that "Jesus Christ" is the name, not only of the Son, but also once of God.

We can debate it here on this thread. Do you accept a debate with me on this topic here on this thread?

Yes or no?