Picking up a topic from an earlier thread: According to scholars, the ancient Hebrew word for God, YHWH, was most likely vocalized as "Yahweh," while the term "Jehovah" is a late-Medieval rendering that transposes the vowels for Adonai into YHWH.
Question for debate: Should Jehovah's Witnesses stop using the term "Jehovah" and instead use the term "Yahweh?"
Yahweh's Witnesses?
Moderator: Moderators
- historia
- Prodigy
- Posts: 2819
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 6:41 pm
- Has thanked: 275 times
- Been thanked: 421 times
Re: Yahweh's Witnesses?
Post #11But, why does it matter what other Christians do? Unless you're saying that Jehovah's Witnesses practice should be determined by what other Christians do.JehovahsWitness wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 1:00 pmI'm saying we use English bible names with a J- the same as other Christians do.historia wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 11:04 amI'm not sure I understand your point here.JehovahsWitness wrote: ↑Mon Sep 05, 2022 5:07 pm
Perhaps, if all the other Christians stopped using the term Jesus
Are you saying that Jehovah's Witnesses practice should be determined by what other Christians do?
- JehovahsWitness
- Savant
- Posts: 22819
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
- Has thanked: 892 times
- Been thanked: 1330 times
- Contact:
Re: Yahweh's Witnesses?
Post #12Because some people do things with good reason following good logic and bible principle. If they do then it is beneficial to point such good logic and bible principle so that it can be imitated. Note what the Apostle Paul said
.1 CORINTHIANS 11 verse 1
You are to imitate me, just as I imitate Christ
The principle being, if someone is doing something right, take note.
The logic (that most people recognise) is that names exist to identify someone and that purpose can be achieved regardless of pronunciation (which varies according to the language). As long as the basic principle of transliteration or translation are respected, and the individual concerned expresses no objection or preference, then Pierre or Peter or Pedro, the point is to know who we are talking about.
The bible principle is that first century Jews, including Jesus himself, were not speakkng the ancient Hebrew of Moses, yet Jesus seemed to understand that the original pronunciation of words, even the words in the Holy texts took a back seat to being understood by his audience.
Jehovahs Witnesses recognise good sense and solid bible principle whereever it be found, even if that be with non-witnesses.
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
- historia
- Prodigy
- Posts: 2819
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 6:41 pm
- Has thanked: 275 times
- Been thanked: 421 times
Re: Yahweh's Witnesses?
Post #13[Replying to JehovahsWitness in post #12]
Okay, so in that case, I think it's pretty safe to say that "Yahweh" is now the preferred term used by most Christians and also non-Christians. It's used pretty consistently across all languages, and has the best claim to being the most accurate rendering.
Would you not agree, then, that there are many good reasons to use "Yahweh" instead of "Jehovah," which at this point has significantly declined in usage.
Okay, so in that case, I think it's pretty safe to say that "Yahweh" is now the preferred term used by most Christians and also non-Christians. It's used pretty consistently across all languages, and has the best claim to being the most accurate rendering.
Would you not agree, then, that there are many good reasons to use "Yahweh" instead of "Jehovah," which at this point has significantly declined in usage.
- JehovahsWitness
- Savant
- Posts: 22819
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
- Has thanked: 892 times
- Been thanked: 1330 times
- Contact:
Re: Yahweh's Witnesses?
Post #14Did I say to adopt the preferred term of the majority or did I say to respect good logic and bible principle?historia wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 2:47 pm [Replying to JehovahsWitness in post #12]
Okay, so in that case, I think it's pretty safe to say that "Yahweh" is now the preferred term used by most Christians and also non-Christians.
JehovahsWitness wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 2:21 pm...it is beneficial to point such good logic and bible principle so that it can be imitated.
The principle being, that people understand who you are talking about: Are the average Joe and Josephine on the street more familiar with the form Yahweh or Jehovah ?
The fact of the matter is ( the English pronunciation " Jehovah" has a very long and well established history that is very easily recognisable in the English language and remains (if I am not mistaken) the form in the King James Bible (one of the oldest and most influencial bible translations). Yahweh may presently be the new kid on the block and be form adopted by most modern day English translations but (and Jehovah's Witnesses are arguably the best placed to know this) if you were to say to the average man or woman on the street "YAHWEH said "this or that" in the bible" ...they would probably ask who Yahweh is.
In short "Yahweh" has about 400 years catching up to do before it can hope to be as established in the English speaking world as the form JEHOVAH.
JW
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
-
- Under Probation
- Posts: 4296
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 10:51 am
- Has thanked: 193 times
- Been thanked: 494 times
Re: Yahweh's Witnesses?
Post #15Use of the name Jehovah in English is far more common and recognized than Yahweh. Other names like Jesus are not changed to Yeshua. You don't see many "Yeshua saves" billboards. The important part is not accuracy, otherwise the correct pronunciation would be in the Bible to clear all doubt. The important part is when I say name Jehovah, does the person know who I'm talking about? (Psalms 83:18) If Yahweh did that better then we would be using it. Yet clearly Almighty God is not concerned with how His name is pronounced seeing that there are MANY ways to say His name in different languages but yet everyone who truly seeks Him knows who He is.historia wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 11:01 amInteresting. Sounds like these modern Hebrew-speaking Jehovah's Witnesses have just adapted the English (or maybe German) pronunciation of "Jehovah."2timothy316 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 05, 2022 3:59 pm
Those that attend Hebrew speaking congregations are called עדי־יהוה
But the predominant pronunciation in English is now "Yahweh." In fact, that same pronunciation is now used across most languages. It's also widely considered to be more accurate.2timothy316 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 05, 2022 3:59 pm
Now should ALL Witnesses go by this pronunciation? No. Why? Jehovah is source of speech and tells people through angels the Good News to all in their own language. This would even include a translation of His name into their language. (Rev. 14:6.)
So why not use it?
- historia
- Prodigy
- Posts: 2819
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 6:41 pm
- Has thanked: 275 times
- Been thanked: 421 times
Re: Yahweh's Witnesses?
Post #16Yahweh.JehovahsWitness wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 3:23 pm
Are the average Joe and Josephine on the street more familiar with the form Yahweh or Jehovah ?
Are you saying that your primary evidence for which form people are most familiar with is the fact that "Jehovah" appears in the King James version?JehovahsWitness wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 3:23 pm
The fact of the matter is ( the English pronunciation " Jehovah" has a very long and well established history that is very easily recognisable in the English language and remains (if I am not mistaken) the form in the King James Bible (one of the oldest and most influencial bible translations). Yahweh may presently be the new kid on the block and be form adopted by most modern day English translations
That's not how language works, otherwise the older forms of terms would never be supplanted by newer ones.JehovahsWitness wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 3:23 pm
In short "Yahweh" has about 400 years catching up to do before it can hope to be as established in the English speaking world as the form JEHOVAH.
- historia
- Prodigy
- Posts: 2819
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 6:41 pm
- Has thanked: 275 times
- Been thanked: 421 times
Re: Yahweh's Witnesses?
Post #17Please provide evidence to support this claim.2timothy316 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 4:32 pm
Use of the name Jehovah in English is far more common and recognized than Yahweh.
- JehovahsWitness
- Savant
- Posts: 22819
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
- Has thanked: 892 times
- Been thanked: 1330 times
- Contact:
Re: Yahweh's Witnesses?
Post #18My primary evidence for which form people are most familiar with is 40 years of speaking with ordinary people on the street and calling on them at their homes along with our collective experience as such of BILLIONS of hours of interacting with people on this topic. Not in academia, not on the selective hothouse religious forums and certainly not in the corridors of institutes of higher theological "learning" but with joe and josephine average, and I can assure you they havent gotten the memo of "Yahweh over Jehovah" yet. Probably because the people that advocate it do so on marginal forums in the virtual world and have never given them a call.historia wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 5:25 pmYahweh.JehovahsWitness wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 3:23 pm
Are the average Joe and Josephine on the street more familiar with the form Yahweh or Jehovah ?
Are you saying that your primary evidence for which form people are most familiar with is the fact that "Jehovah" appears in the King James version?JehovahsWitness wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 3:23 pm
The fact of the matter is ( the English pronunciation " Jehovah" has a very long and well established history that is very easily recognisable in the English language and remains (if I am not mistaken) the form in the King James Bible (one of the oldest and most influencial bible translations). Yahweh may presently be the new kid on the block and be form adopted by most modern day English translations
As for the King James Bible it is arguably one of the most influential piece of literature as regard to the English lanhuage and not to be scoffed at (not implying that you did) when it comes to how our language developed. Its use of the form JEHOVAH (IEHOVA) is one of the reasons the form is so familiar to English speakers (and beyond) especially in traditionally protestant lands and why it has found its way into hymnes and onto monuments all over Europe as well as the countries their missionaries proselytized.
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
- historia
- Prodigy
- Posts: 2819
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 6:41 pm
- Has thanked: 275 times
- Been thanked: 421 times
Re: Yahweh's Witnesses?
Post #19Do you have survey data to support that anecdote?JehovahsWitness wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 6:53 pm
My primary evidence for which form people are most familiar with is 40 years of speaking with ordinary people on the street and calling on them at their homes
I see "Yahweh" used all the time by Christian speakers and in popular Christian publications -- rarely, if ever, do I see "Jehovah" anymore -- so we don't need to imagine that it is only being "advocated" for on "marginal forums in the virtual world," or just in academia. Its use is widespread.JehovahsWitness wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 6:53 pm
I can assure you they havent gotten the memo of "Yahweh over Jehovah" yet. Probably because the people that advocate it do so on marginal forums in the virtual world and have never given them a call.
I agree completely, but its influence is not absolute. Many of its terms and phrases have been supplanted by newer ones. We can see that on this particular question by looking at term frequency analysis in books over the past 100 years.JehovahsWitness wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 6:53 pm
As for the King James Bible it is arguably one of the most influential piece of literature as regard to the English lanhuage and not to be scoffed at (not implying that you did) when it comes to how our language developed.
- Tcg
- Savant
- Posts: 8667
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
- Location: Third Stone
- Has thanked: 2257 times
- Been thanked: 2368 times
Re: Yahweh's Witnesses?
Post #20The most commonly used name/title is most undoubtedly God. Beyond that, one has to wonder what the big deal is. Are we to conclude that God is confused about who one is praying to if they use the wrong name? It's much ado about nothing.historia wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 2:47 pm [Replying to JehovahsWitness in post #12]
Okay, so in that case, I think it's pretty safe to say that "Yahweh" is now the preferred term used by most Christians and also non-Christians. It's used pretty consistently across all languages, and has the best claim to being the most accurate rendering.
Would you not agree, then, that there are many good reasons to use "Yahweh" instead of "Jehovah," which at this point has significantly declined in usage.
Tcg
To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods.
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom