On women preachers

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
JoeyKnothead
Banned
Banned
Posts: 20879
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
Location: Here
Has thanked: 4093 times
Been thanked: 2573 times

On women preachers

Post #1

Post by JoeyKnothead »

Howdy y'all, how y'all doing?
I know I aint much sposed to here, but here we go...

It seems as if there's a thing there, where the womenfolk're to be hushed in church.

But what if I'm in church, and it didn't done burn down, and there's a male preacher there, apreaching and carrying on, only he either can't sale him the tale, or I can't me understand it.

But theres a woman there, who sets me right on the path, straight and true.

For debate:

Should women preachers be allowed to do em it from the pulpit?

I remind folks that in this section of the site, well how bout that :wave:
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin

2timothy316
Under Probation
Posts: 4296
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 10:51 am
Has thanked: 193 times
Been thanked: 494 times

Re: On women preachers

Post #21

Post by 2timothy316 »

[Replying to tam in post #21]

Cool. Next I'll just report you instead if that is what you prefer.

User avatar
OnceConvinced
Savant
Posts: 8969
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:22 pm
Location: New Zealand
Has thanked: 50 times
Been thanked: 67 times
Contact:

Re: On women preachers

Post #22

Post by OnceConvinced »

JehovahsWitness wrote: Tue Aug 10, 2021 9:43 pm
OnceConvinced wrote: Tue Aug 10, 2021 6:24 pm [Replying to PinSeeker in post #7]

So do you consider it morally acceptable that women not be allowed to teach in churches?
IS IT MORAL TO LIMIT CHRISTIAN LEADERSHIP TO MALE MEMBERS OF THE CHURCH?

Yes it is. MORALITY refers to principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behaviour.

Many see limiting women in that way as wrong and bad behavior. It is sexist. It is immoral. It is no different to limiting the rights of people because they are black.
JehovahsWitness wrote: Tue Aug 10, 2021 9:43 pm Many today consider it "immoral", bad or wrong that certain responsibilities are prohibited to women but bible beliving Christians hold it is Almighty God that ultimately determines what is to be considered "right or wrong".
That too is immoral. If it's all about what God sees as moral and immoral then one day he could decide that raping children is moral and we would have to accept it as moral.

God determined that human sacrifice was moral by telling Abraham to sacrifice his son and also sending his son to be crucified. Human sacrifice is clearly immoral and if a God says it's ok, then we should reject that God for being an immoral thug. Same applies to any other immoral things that God says is ok. (Like ordering armies to kill everyone but keep the virgin girls)
Jehovahs Witnesses believe that since the bible prohibits women from positions of congregational leadership, it is right and proper to act accordingly.
Sexism is moral. Just because God deems it to be moral. Surrrrre. :?

JehovahsWitness wrote: Tue Aug 10, 2021 9:43 pm DOES THIS PROHIBITION DEVALUE WOMEN ?
Of course it does. It elevates men over women.
JehovahsWitness wrote: Tue Aug 10, 2021 9:43 pm
No. Firstly congregational teaching is not a right it is a privilege extended to those God sees as most fitting for the role according to his good pleasure. Men, for example cannot concieve, carry and give birth to children; that privilege (arguably one of the greatest) has been is extended only to one sex. This is not a reflection on the value God holds men to but is simply how He has chosen to organise how physical families are organised. In a similar way, the congrgation is organised in a certain way, with each member having a role for the benefit of the whole.

Further, even though women do not teach during the public meetings, they do participate as well as also play a valuable role in the congrgation supporting and upbuilding both men and women, young and old. Last but by no means least, women are considered Ministers as they preach and teach the good news of the Kingdom publically, a privilege held out to all qualified members of the congregation.
This all seems like you are making excuses for a sexist religion. We have a female prime minister here in New Zealand who was pregnant during her first term. It did not stop her from doing her job. In fact she is applauded all around the world and was voted in for a second term.

What really appalls me is seeing women trying to justify the sexism of their organization. To me it seems like those Muslim women who are ok with men beating their wives.

Society and its morals evolve and will continue to evolve. The bible however remains the same and just requires more and more apologetics and claims of "metaphors" and "symbolism" to justify it.

Prayer is like rubbing an old bottle and hoping that a genie will pop out and grant you three wishes.

There is much about this world that is mind boggling and impressive, but I see no need whatsoever to put it down to magical super powered beings.


Check out my website: Recker's World

User avatar
JehovahsWitness
Savant
Posts: 22820
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
Has thanked: 892 times
Been thanked: 1331 times
Contact:

Re: On women preachers

Post #23

Post by JehovahsWitness »

OnceConvinced wrote: Thu Aug 12, 2021 5:10 pm
Many see limiting women in that way as wrong and bad behavior.
Well we are discussing biblical theology and that is not established by majority vote. Biblically there is nothing at all wrong or sexist about with how God has arranged the congregation. Thank you for sharing your personal opinion, if there is a religion where you are considered God, I'm sure its members would care what you think.


JW
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681


"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" -
Romans 14:8

User avatar
Tcg
Savant
Posts: 8667
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
Location: Third Stone
Has thanked: 2257 times
Been thanked: 2368 times

Re: On women preachers

Post #24

Post by Tcg »

Moderator Comment

Rather than addressing possible rule infractions made by others, you should abide by rule #17:

17. Do not comment on any rule infractions made by others. Ignore any rule violations made by others and only respond by reporting it to the moderators.

Please review the Rules.


______________

Moderator comments do not count as a strike against any posters. They only serve as an acknowledgment that a post report has been received, but has not been judged to warrant a moderator warning against a particular poster. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.
2timothy316 wrote: Thu Aug 12, 2021 8:37 am [Replying to tam in post #21]

Cool. Next I'll just report you instead if that is what you prefer.

User avatar
William
Savant
Posts: 15237
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:11 pm
Location: Te Waipounamu
Has thanked: 974 times
Been thanked: 1799 times
Contact:

Re: On women preachers

Post #25

Post by William »

[Replying to OnceConvinced in post #23]
What really appalls me is seeing women trying to justify the sexism of their organization. To me it seems like those Muslim women who are ok with men beating their wives.
I think that the problem [overall] stems from the way ancient folk chose to view the world they were born and raised in.

I imagine some time further back before the formation of cultures and cults, pre-historic Humans evolved their thinking into formulating questions based upon what they saw that nature did, and bringing in the idea of 'gods' gave them positive reinforcement that their interpretations of their observations in nature, were 'obviously' correct.

For example, the biblical idea of a Creator cursing the females of the Human specie, wasn't so much inspired by some god as it was the product of introducing the idea of being within a Creation, and thus 'gods'.

So when Men witnessed the natural great pain that Women went through, instead of just accepting that as natural, they saw it as some kind of punishment that some god who created them, [both Man and Woman] cursed them with, and that the gods actually obviously favored Men, on account of the evidence.

That is also why Women, even those in JWs position, argue that there is nothing at all wrong or sexist about with how the god of the bible ["God"] has "arranged the congregation". There is an acceptance of the supernatural explanation for natural events, so it is a logical extension of that idea.

How else are we to explain why a Creator would allow such pain in childbirth, unless it was a punishment for some unspecified wrong-doing, something which we can now refer to as a specified explanation, by conveniently grabbing a red-letter, leather-bound, gold-foiled product and reading the very inspired words of that god, for ourselves?

Makes perfect sense.

I think that even if this universe is a Creation, Women experiencing the great pain of Childbirth, does not necessarily logical have to mean that The Creator intended it to be punishment. If we are going to use such logic, we would have to agree then that the whole universe was meant to be a punishment for Human beings, way before the planting of the seed of the forbidden tree occurred.

User avatar
JehovahsWitness
Savant
Posts: 22820
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
Has thanked: 892 times
Been thanked: 1331 times
Contact:

Re: On women preachers

Post #26

Post by JehovahsWitness »

William wrote: Fri Aug 13, 2021 2:10 pm
How else are we to explain why a Creator would allow such pain in childbirth...
JW


Biblically the increased pain of childbirth was the result of the original sin.



Are labour pains sexist?
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 03#p801703

Did God cause labour pains?
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 58#p801758
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681


"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" -
Romans 14:8

User avatar
William
Savant
Posts: 15237
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:11 pm
Location: Te Waipounamu
Has thanked: 974 times
Been thanked: 1799 times
Contact:

Re: On women preachers

Post #27

Post by William »

JehovahsWitness wrote: Fri Aug 13, 2021 5:39 pm
William wrote: Fri Aug 13, 2021 2:10 pm
How else are we to explain why a Creator would allow such pain in childbirth, unless it was a punishment for some unspecified wrong-doing, something which we can now refer to as a specified explanation, by conveniently grabbing a red-letter, leather-bound, gold-foiled product and reading the very inspired words of that god, for ourselves?
Biblically the increased pain of childbirth was the result of the original sin.
Not directly the result of. Biblical reference tells us it was the result of being cursed by the god. Without the curse, the pain could not have been amped up..
The point of my post was to show that, and to show why it is not a rational belief to hold, as I explained why in my last post, which you choose to ignore.
An apparently habitual response which as usual, doesn't impact against my own arguments in any way that it even required being written down and publishing to this debate Thread in any case.

My point remains that there is no reason to place an extra layer of 'supernatural explanation' over natural enough things, and that Human Woman have always experience great pain in childbirth, simply because that is the natural thing which happens. Not because it is a punishment from a god because a Woman sinned by disobeying the god who then cursed her and her 'kind' [Women].

User avatar
onewithhim
Savant
Posts: 10889
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:56 pm
Location: Norwich, CT
Has thanked: 1537 times
Been thanked: 435 times

Re: On women preachers

Post #28

Post by onewithhim »

tam wrote: Wed Aug 11, 2021 1:27 pm Peace to you,
onewithhim wrote: Wed Aug 11, 2021 9:24 am [Replying to tam in post #12]

Someone has to take the lead in the congregations, even though Christ is our Leader. Christ has delegated certain duties to the brothers who make up the programs and pay the bills and communicate with the Governing Body, etc. If someone were not delegated, there would be confusion and chaos in the congregations with everybody doing what they feel like doing, or not doing. It is said, "Let everything take place decently and by arrangement." (I Corinthians 14:40)
There's no electric bill in the Body of Christ. Christ is Himself the Light, and the water is FREE. (Rev 22:17; John 7:37)

There is no rent or mortgage, because the Body of Christ is not a building or a kingdom hall or a religion. Maintenance and upkeep is spiritual (just as worship of God is in spirit and in truth).

Christ is the Leader and the Teacher of His Church/His Body. Christ directs and teaches and disciplines and leads His Body (the individual members), Himself. Just as He sent Phillip to the Ethiopian. Just as He sent Paul to the Gentiles (taking Stephen's place, since Stephen was murdered with Paul's approval when Paul persecuted the church). Just as He sent Ananias to Paul. Just as He sent Peter to Cornelius. Christ places each member where He wants them to be in the Body, trains and disciplines them Himself, gives gifts of the spirit to each member as He knows is needed.


Peace again to you, and to you all,
your servant and a slave of Christ,
tammy
Then what does this mean?

"Let us consider one another to provoke unto love and to good works: Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching." (Hebrews 10:24,25, KJV)

User avatar
tam
Savant
Posts: 6522
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 4:59 pm
Has thanked: 360 times
Been thanked: 331 times
Contact:

Re: On women preachers

Post #29

Post by tam »

onewithhim wrote: Fri Aug 13, 2021 7:41 pm
tam wrote: Wed Aug 11, 2021 1:27 pm Peace to you,
onewithhim wrote: Wed Aug 11, 2021 9:24 am [Replying to tam in post #12]

Someone has to take the lead in the congregations, even though Christ is our Leader. Christ has delegated certain duties to the brothers who make up the programs and pay the bills and communicate with the Governing Body, etc. If someone were not delegated, there would be confusion and chaos in the congregations with everybody doing what they feel like doing, or not doing. It is said, "Let everything take place decently and by arrangement." (I Corinthians 14:40)
There's no electric bill in the Body of Christ. Christ is Himself the Light, and the water is FREE. (Rev 22:17; John 7:37)

There is no rent or mortgage, because the Body of Christ is not a building or a kingdom hall or a religion. Maintenance and upkeep is spiritual (just as worship of God is in spirit and in truth).

Christ is the Leader and the Teacher of His Church/His Body. Christ directs and teaches and disciplines and leads His Body (the individual members), Himself. Just as He sent Phillip to the Ethiopian. Just as He sent Paul to the Gentiles (taking Stephen's place, since Stephen was murdered with Paul's approval when Paul persecuted the church). Just as He sent Ananias to Paul. Just as He sent Peter to Cornelius. Christ places each member where He wants them to be in the Body, trains and disciplines them Himself, gives gifts of the spirit to each member as He knows is needed.


Peace again to you, and to you all,
your servant and a slave of Christ,
tammy
Then what does this mean?

"Let us consider one another to provoke unto love and to good works: Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching." (Hebrews 10:24,25, KJV)
This means that the author of Hebrews encouraged the Hebrews (the people he wrote to) to keep gathering (and/or to keep gathering people IN to themselves) even though some others had stopped doing that.

It doesn't mean anything more than that. If a brother and a sister come to my house (or me to theirs), we have gathered together (and we would do so in Christ).


Peace again to you.

User avatar
onewithhim
Savant
Posts: 10889
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:56 pm
Location: Norwich, CT
Has thanked: 1537 times
Been thanked: 435 times

Re: On women preachers

Post #30

Post by onewithhim »

tam wrote: Fri Aug 13, 2021 9:16 pm
onewithhim wrote: Fri Aug 13, 2021 7:41 pm
tam wrote: Wed Aug 11, 2021 1:27 pm Peace to you,
onewithhim wrote: Wed Aug 11, 2021 9:24 am [Replying to tam in post #12]

Someone has to take the lead in the congregations, even though Christ is our Leader. Christ has delegated certain duties to the brothers who make up the programs and pay the bills and communicate with the Governing Body, etc. If someone were not delegated, there would be confusion and chaos in the congregations with everybody doing what they feel like doing, or not doing. It is said, "Let everything take place decently and by arrangement." (I Corinthians 14:40)
There's no electric bill in the Body of Christ. Christ is Himself the Light, and the water is FREE. (Rev 22:17; John 7:37)

There is no rent or mortgage, because the Body of Christ is not a building or a kingdom hall or a religion. Maintenance and upkeep is spiritual (just as worship of God is in spirit and in truth).

Christ is the Leader and the Teacher of His Church/His Body. Christ directs and teaches and disciplines and leads His Body (the individual members), Himself. Just as He sent Phillip to the Ethiopian. Just as He sent Paul to the Gentiles (taking Stephen's place, since Stephen was murdered with Paul's approval when Paul persecuted the church). Just as He sent Ananias to Paul. Just as He sent Peter to Cornelius. Christ places each member where He wants them to be in the Body, trains and disciplines them Himself, gives gifts of the spirit to each member as He knows is needed.


Peace again to you, and to you all,
your servant and a slave of Christ,
tammy
Then what does this mean?

"Let us consider one another to provoke unto love and to good works: Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching." (Hebrews 10:24,25, KJV)
This means that the author of Hebrews encouraged the Hebrews (the people he wrote to) to keep gathering (and/or to keep gathering people IN to themselves) even though some others had stopped doing that.

It doesn't mean anything more than that. If a brother and a sister come to my house (or me to theirs), we have gathered together (and we would do so in Christ).


Peace again to you.
According to my dictionary (Funk and Wagnalls), "assemble" has the meaning of "To bring or come together IN A CROWD." How does that harmonize with your idea of one or two meeting together?

Post Reply