Diagoras wrote:
There seems to be so far broad agreement here that modern-day claims of ‘speaking in tongues’ are ridiculous.
If the Biblical stories of people speaking in such as way as to be ‘understood by everyone in their own language’ were true, does that mean that those people claiming to be able to do so today are simply deluding themselves, or are they deliberately lying for some reason?
The former might be simple wish fulfilment (“I want it to be true�), but the latter reason casts the proponents of ‘tongues’ in a very bad light.
Personally, I’d ascribe it to self-delusion, but I’d be interested to hear whether others consider ‘tongues’ to be on a par with false prophecy, for example.
I would say that speaking in tongues, as described in the NT, is not ridiculous, but doing so as claimed by posters to have witnessed, is probably ridiculous.
I would also say that some tongues speaking is false, some is true, and some is self-delusion.
Yes, prophecy is on a par, in regard to the three categories; false, true, and self-delusion.