Subforum assumption, Bible authority

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
daedalus 2.0
Banned
Banned
Posts: 1000
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:52 pm
Location: NYC

Subforum assumption, Bible authority

Post #1

Post by daedalus 2.0 »

The purpose of this subforum is to have a place to freely engage in debates on Christian theology with the basic assumption that the Bible can be used as a primary reference without the need to defend its authority. Responses to topics with "but first you have to prove that the Bible is true" is not allowed here.
I agree. This subforum allows the believer to skip the sticky, uncomfortable mess of showing the Bible is true and dive right into their doctrine. This forum needs to be this way because Xians need protection from this basic logical process.

Now, when I reference Andrea Yates or Fred Phelps as an example of the dangers of Xianity, the Xian will say: But you can't judge Xianity by the people who don't represent Xianity.

My question is this: If we are assuming the Bible is an authority - whose authority do we use? All we get are a long list of people who DON'T speak for Xianity, but is there anyone who does? Jesus? But he didn't write anything and the Bible's authority is up to interpretation.

Personally, I like Bob Price's or Bishop Shelby Sprong's interpretation.

Whose authority do you accept as the authority on what authority the Bible holds as authority?
Imagine the people who believe ... and not ashamed to ignore, totally, all the patient findings of thinking minds through all the centuries since the Bible.... It is these ignorant people�who would force their feeble and childish beliefs on us...I.Asimov

User avatar
daedalus 2.0
Banned
Banned
Posts: 1000
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:52 pm
Location: NYC

Post #21

Post by daedalus 2.0 »

Confused wrote:
daedalus 2.0 wrote:Confused, I am sorry. As the Xian says: blessed be they who are not offended by me. I wish I had God on my side so I could call people "fools" openly, but alas, I am an atheist and have to fight my own battles.
Do you really want a comment for this? I fail to see God fighting any battles here. Granted, I don't know God, so I am blind there. But just because some poor individuals use choice words like "fools" doesn't mean you must sink lower than them.
daedalus 2.0 wrote: As for the difference between nuts and True Xians. How am I to tell the difference? All the nuts today seem to be little different from the heroes of piety from ages before. Many Xians died for their beliefs knowingly. Are these the nuts you are talking about? Joan of Arc who had visions? Mother Theresa who confessed alter to being agnostic or atheist?
My comment was narrowly applied to the Christians on this forum, as they were the ones you addressed in the post I replied to.
daedalus 2.0 wrote: Why are the nuts today so similar to the prophets, disciples and other major church figures from yesterday? And the luke-warm heretics of yesterday are the True Xians today? Fred Phelps is no different than Paul, Moses is no different than Osama Bin Laden. Andrea Yates is the same as Jephthah.

I would love to know what year it was when True became Nuts and Nuts became True.
My distinction between nuts and those of who I would say meet the criteria of truly able to debate their religion without resorting to fallacies and attacks are self evident in many cases. The nuts I refer to are generally the ones you attract on this forum because any self respecting Christian would find it a waste of time to debate you as your mind has already categorized them in the condescending categories you have listed.
Confused, I respect you and your ability to keep a cool head. I will continue to try to keep an even keel.

1. I don't know if it is "lowering" myself to them. They are trying to make a Biblically supported point (the Bible is authority here) - it is part of the doctrine. The fact that fools go to hell, people who call people fools go to hell - but then Jesus and others call people fools: it is a very complex/confusing doctrine that is obviously more nuanced than my sinful brain can comprehend.

2. To a more interesting topic: I still wonder about your "more sensible" Xians. What Xian was that sensible one in the formation of Xianity? For example, which person was more reasonable in the formation of the Xian church? Based on what?

Here's my point: Any "True" Xian today would be considered a lukewarm, heretic by the measure of the original Xians. They were all Nuts. Jesus on down. What religious leader has ever been considered a good, normal person who debates nicely and doesn't appeal to the Bible forcefully and biasedly?

You are pointing to people who are moderate, lukewarm, sensible people who mildly support Xianity - not people who are admired for their "Faith" by their followers.
Imagine the people who believe ... and not ashamed to ignore, totally, all the patient findings of thinking minds through all the centuries since the Bible.... It is these ignorant people�who would force their feeble and childish beliefs on us...I.Asimov

User avatar
OnceConvinced
Savant
Posts: 8969
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:22 pm
Location: New Zealand
Has thanked: 50 times
Been thanked: 67 times
Contact:

Re: Subforum assumption, Bible authority

Post #22

Post by OnceConvinced »

Word_Swordsman wrote: Using the Bible as a source not needing defense here (which it doesn't need anywhere), the Bible is self-declarative concerning inspiration from God to men to write His words in Job 32:8 "But there is a spirit in man: and the inspiration of the Almighty giveth them understanding." and in 2 Tim. 3:16 "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:"
The thing is the Holy Spirit is not able to bring unity amongst Christians. We have numerous Christians who come through here believing they have true understanding of scripture, but yet they all believe different things. Where's the unity? If the Holy Spirit really did show Christians understanding there would be no arguments amongst them. But there is. None of them can agree! So how can any Christian be taken seriously when they claim the bible says a certain thing, when other Christians claim it says something different?

Can you see that nobody is going to take anyone seriously who claims they have holy-spirit lead understanding? Why should you for instance be taken any more seriously than other Christians here who claim to have Holy Spirit understanding?

Society and its morals evolve and will continue to evolve. The bible however remains the same and just requires more and more apologetics and claims of "metaphors" and "symbolism" to justify it.

Prayer is like rubbing an old bottle and hoping that a genie will pop out and grant you three wishes.

There is much about this world that is mind boggling and impressive, but I see no need whatsoever to put it down to magical super powered beings.


Check out my website: Recker's World

User avatar
Confused
Site Supporter
Posts: 7308
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 5:55 am
Location: Alaska

Post #23

Post by Confused »

daedalus 2.0 wrote: 1. I don't know if it is "lowering" myself to them. They are trying to make a Biblically supported point (the Bible is authority here) - it is part of the doctrine. The fact that fools go to hell, people who call people fools go to hell - but then Jesus and others call people fools: it is a very complex/confusing doctrine that is obviously more nuanced than my sinful brain can comprehend.
Mine too, so I will share your fate perhaps.
daedalus 2.0 wrote: 2. To a more interesting topic: I still wonder about your "more sensible" Xians. What Xian was that sensible one in the formation of Xianity? For example, which person was more reasonable in the formation of the Xian church? Based on what?
I guess I wasn't quite as clear as I intended. My comments was only related to some Christians on this forum. As your categories were applied to the narrow confines of what you have seen on this forum, I don't believe that is the case. There are some on this forum who are reasonable. But that says nothing about the Christian church. Only some Christian debaters here.
daedalus 2.0 wrote: Here's my point: Any "True" Xian today would be considered a lukewarm, heretic by the measure of the original Xians. They were all Nuts. Jesus on down. What religious leader has ever been considered a good, normal person who debates nicely and doesn't appeal to the Bible forcefully and biasedly?
Your point may hold merit, I don't really know. I made no comment about such things.
daedalus 2.0 wrote: You are pointing to people who are moderate, lukewarm, sensible people who mildly support Xianity - not people who are admired for their "Faith" by their followers.
Yes. Because I cannot say they are admired by their followers as I don't know that much about them. Only that they are actually admired by several on this forum, to include atheists and non-theists.
What we do for ourselves dies with us,
What we do for others and the world remains
and is immortal.

-Albert Pine
Never be bullied into silence.
Never allow yourself to be made a victim.
Accept no one persons definition of your life; define yourself.

-Harvey Fierstein

User avatar
OnceConvinced
Savant
Posts: 8969
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:22 pm
Location: New Zealand
Has thanked: 50 times
Been thanked: 67 times
Contact:

Re: Subforum assumption, Bible authority

Post #24

Post by OnceConvinced »

Word_Swordsman wrote:It is apparent to me a lot of those facts would only further confuse atheists here who obviously are too deficient in Bible knowledge to carry on a civil, meaningful discussion, let alone an actual debate.
Here you go with insults again. Why do you assume that when someone disagrees with you they are confused and deficient in Bible knowledge. This is not always the case. Just because someone does not see something from your point of view does not mean they are confused or lacking understanding.
Instead of actual debate, what I read from atheists is how they are personally offended over what the Bible says, as well as what they assume it says. God predicted that.
God also predicted false teachers and prophets and we get a lot of these coming through here too. Most of them claim to have Holy spirit understanding of scripture.

One should also be wary of the following scripture:

Proverbs 26:12
Do you see a man wise in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than him.
God predicted that
Ah, but you see, God did not predict that. Man predicted that and claimed they were hearing from God. Much like you claim you are hearing from God.

You seem to think that because the bible is to be considered authoritive on this forum that we should take that as being considered "God's infallible word". I don't believe that to be the case at all.

We Christians have a Bible code of conduct that commands respect as well as truth in telling. I don't detect any similar code of civil, constructive, tempered, intelligent conduct among most atheists here.
So when are you going to live by your code of conduct? When are you going to show other members of this forum respect? When are you going to do any of these things you expect from others here? One who claims to have the Holy spirit should be able to show the fruits of the holy spirit. So far I am seeing none of those fruits in you:

Gal 5:22-26 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law. And they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts. If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit. Let us not be desirous of vain glory, provoking one another, envying one another


Let me wrap this all up to keep it relevent to the thread. Yes, let's accept the bible as an authority but lets not attempt to use it to support our own personal agendas and let's not assume it is the infallible word of God. Because it quite clearly is not. Let's be aware that other people's interpretations of it are different to ours and just because those people disagree, or just because those people are atheists (which BTW I am not), does not mean they are fools, nor does it mean they don't understand. It's all to do with PERSPECTIVE.

Society and its morals evolve and will continue to evolve. The bible however remains the same and just requires more and more apologetics and claims of "metaphors" and "symbolism" to justify it.

Prayer is like rubbing an old bottle and hoping that a genie will pop out and grant you three wishes.

There is much about this world that is mind boggling and impressive, but I see no need whatsoever to put it down to magical super powered beings.


Check out my website: Recker's World

Word_Swordsman
Scholar
Posts: 296
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:15 pm
Location: Arkansas

Subforum assumption, Bible authority

Post #25

Post by Word_Swordsman »

daedalus 2.0 wrote:
Why are the nuts today so similar to the prophets, disciples and other major church figures from yesterday?
Glad you asked. The Christians today who take the Bible and Jesus seriously, not just on Sunday, but every day, are led by the same Holy Spirit that led those giants of the faith. You wither before true Christians like a six year old child gazing upon a nuclear explosion, asked to explain what caused it. touché
daedalus 2.0 wrote: WS: You have said enough to make it clear you can't debate an atheist. Once you suggest that we have Satan/demons whispering in our ear, you have effectively erased your ability to be unbiased and the atheist will always know that at the crucial part of the debate in which you will have no answer you will plead some supernatural "out".
You are not in the same tree. You sit on a branch of an atheist "tree" shouting at someone sitting in the Tree of Life (Jesus). Like I said, you have no concept of biblical concepts and really have nothing to bring to a Bible debate except denials based on rage against God. You just say you don't believe in God, but the truth is you hate God. Again, you keep forgetting the Bible is a valid source of information here, where your atheistic rants are meaningless. You are in fact under the power of Satan, but you can't know that any more than a person can know they suffer from Alzheimer's. Christians instantly recognize where you stand, and most see there is no possibility of an atheist engaging in debate over the Bible. So fasr you atheists have only managed to verify God's word concerning the spiritually blinded on earth. You have yet to provide anything sane or useful concerning your war against Christianity. Ya'll act as though a little army armed with popcorn guns. touché
daedalus 2.0 wrote:Also, I am amazed that you find that there are some people who can not find grace from God. I imagine you differ from many Xians, and while you are confident to judge them as not proper XIans, I know other Xians who would consider you a bad Xian.


I would think you would be spending your time with the little Hitlers that have their own sites sporting great confusion. You point to the "many" Jesus spoke of. Matthew 7:21-24 "Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. [22] Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? [23] And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity. [24] Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock:"

You are not of that "many". False disciples who abuse the word of God, distorting the gospel, are numbered there. If they call me a bad Christian while ignoring the word of God, then they are of that number. Many people regarding themselves to be Christians are deceived, missing the mark. touché
daedalus 2.0 wrote:So, we are back to square one. If the Bible is that authority: who determines what it says?
No, YOU are back to square one because you can't learn what the Bible teaches. Anyone who reads and comprehends the literal words of the Bible inherits that authority to the point of preaching the gospel of Christ. There are only a few types of interpretations the Bible recognizes. Dreams require interpretation by inspiration of God. Tongues require interpretation to the unbeliever. And some unique names in the Bible call for interpretation, such as in John 1:42 "And he brought him to Jesus. And when Jesus beheld him, he said, Thou art Simon the son of Jona: thou shalt be called Cephas, which is by interpretation, A stone." touché
daedalus 2.0 wrote:Also, you haven't sown sufficient knowledge of the Bible to debate these points. You show you have a clear understanding of your own doctrine based on selective readings of the Bible, but hardly a Christian perspective. You are more accurately call a "Word_Swordian" since you are only a prophet to your own beliefs. You obviously don't speak for the Bible.
I'm putting the quote marks in on every part of your posts before even reading them. I know before reading I have the answer provided by God. You have not yet shown where I have misused the scriptures. In the opinion of an atheist I don't know the Bible! That is an oxymoron. I use my knowledge of it and all you can say is I don't have knowledge. There's a term for such behavior, but I'd be pushing the ban button. Test my knowledge. So far all your challenges have fallen flat at your own feet. You have not proved one instance of me having ignorance of the Bible. You can't do it. touché
daedalus 2.0 wrote:edit: WS, also please note that "atheism" is the opposite of "theism". No one speaks for theism, no one speaks for atheism. Try not to make such glaring category errors when attempting to even mention debating people.
I have consistently provided proper debate challenges, answered only by your denials with no proofs. You are not a debater. That requires knowledge. You have yet to demonstrate any knowledge of the Bible or Christianity, therefore disqualifying yourself. I speak for theism, in particular Christianity, you are certainly exhibiting the mental anguish of anti theism.

touché

User avatar
daedalus 2.0
Banned
Banned
Posts: 1000
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:52 pm
Location: NYC

Re: Subforum assumption, Bible authority

Post #26

Post by daedalus 2.0 »

OnceConvinced wrote:
Word_Swordsman wrote: Using the Bible as a source not needing defense here (which it doesn't need anywhere), the Bible is self-declarative concerning inspiration from God to men to write His words in Job 32:8 "But there is a spirit in man: and the inspiration of the Almighty giveth them understanding." and in 2 Tim. 3:16 "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:"
The thing is the Holy Spirit is not able to bring unity amongst Christians. We have numerous Christians who come through here believing they have true understanding of scripture, but yet they all believe different things. Where's the unity? If the Holy Spirit really did show Christians understanding there would be no arguments amongst them. But there is. None of them can agree! So how can any Christian be taken seriously when they claim the bible says a certain thing, when other Christians claim it says something different?

Can you see that nobody is going to take anyone seriously who claims they have holy-spirit lead understanding? Why should you for instance be taken any more seriously than other Christians here who claim to have Holy Spirit understanding?
Especially when this guy is cherry-picking verses out of the Bible as if each of the writers knew their book was going to be elected into the Canon 200 years later. Perhaps each writer claimed their account was true, but they NEVER claimed -SPECIFICALLY - that the other books were true. Even the most Fundi Xian must admit this.

There is a reason Faith is considered a virtue in Xianity: because its so damn impossible to achieve when you study the Bible.
2 Tim. 3:16 "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
All? As I recall, there are only FOUR books from the TWELVE apostles in the Bible.

Must be Bible Math: All = 1/3.

And Q can't even be found. Seems the inspiration of God ain't what it used to be.
Imagine the people who believe ... and not ashamed to ignore, totally, all the patient findings of thinking minds through all the centuries since the Bible.... It is these ignorant people�who would force their feeble and childish beliefs on us...I.Asimov

User avatar
JoeyKnothead
Banned
Banned
Posts: 20879
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
Location: Here
Has thanked: 4093 times
Been thanked: 2573 times

Post #27

Post by JoeyKnothead »

Word_Swordsman wrote: I would think you would be spending your time with the little Hitlers that have their own sites sporting great confusion.

I know before reading I have the answer provided by God.

You are not a debater. That requires knowledge.
I understand now why I got censured for calling this dude 'a nice, tolerant person.'

Really, I think I'm just through with it. He's gonna be allowed to insult anyone he wants, and we can't even call him a 'nice, tolerant person.'

Word_Swordsman
Scholar
Posts: 296
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:15 pm
Location: Arkansas

Re: Subforum assumption, Bible authority

Post #28

Post by Word_Swordsman »

OnceConvinced wrote:
Word_Swordsman wrote:It is apparent to me a lot of those facts would only further confuse atheists here who obviously are too deficient in Bible knowledge to carry on a civil, meaningful discussion, let alone an actual debate.
OnceConvinced wrote:Here you go with insults again. Why do you assume that when someone disagrees with you they are confused and deficient in Bible knowledge. This is not always the case. Just because someone does not see something from your point of view does not mean they are confused or lacking understanding.
OK, then SAY something that at least sounds educated concerning my Bible claims. I will compare the atheist comments so far to Einstein giving a lecture on relativity, asking for comments at the end. "Sir, do you use Aussie hair spray?" So far you have not expressed a bit of intelligence concerning what the Bible actually says. Forget my supposed "interpretations". Just deal with at least one passage of the scriptures I have used in rel=ply to the many absurd atheist comments. If you disagreed with me using somethig solid, like scriptures I would then be able to answer back with subject matter.
Instead of actual debate, what I read from atheists is how they are personally offended over what the Bible says, as well as what they assume it says. God predicted that.
OnceConvinced wrote:God also predicted false teachers and prophets and we get a lot of these coming through here too. Most of them claim to have Holy spirit understanding of scripture.
I have found some of those. None of them had many things to say that could be backed up in the Bible. I have yet to be pinned down with a false teaching by any atheist. You atheists just claim me wrong with no evidence, making false accusations.
OnceConvinced wrote:One should also be wary of the following scripture:

Proverbs 26:12 "Do you see a man wise in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than him."
You have been doing that all along, just "thinking" you have enough wisdom to debate a disciple of Christ.

1 Cor. 2:16 "For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? But we (Christians) have the mind of Christ."
WS: God predicted that
OnceConvinced wrote:Ah, but you see, God did not predict that. Man predicted that and claimed they were hearing from God. Much like you claim you are hearing from God.

You seem to think that because the bible is to be considered authoritive on this forum that we should take that as being considered "God's infallible word". I don't believe that to be the case at all.
Again, you demonstrate a bit of delusion, great forgetfulness. I am citing the Bible, a valid source here. Men by inspiration of God predicted all the attitudes atheists exhibit here. You cannot show integrity by denigrating the testimony of the Bible on this sub forum. You fail to understand the Bible is self-declarative as to the authority of God's word, which the Bible is. I've already provided the claims in the Bible as to it's authority.
WS: We Christians have a Bible code of conduct that commands respect as well as truth in telling. I don't detect any similar code of civil, constructive, tempered, intelligent conduct among most atheists here.
OnceConvinced wrote:So when are you going to live by your code of conduct? When are you going to show other members of this forum respect? When are you going to do any of these things you expect from others here? One who claims to have the Holy spirit should be able to show the fruits of the holy spirit. So far I am seeing none of those fruits in you:
I am commanded to love my enemies the same way Jesus loved His enemies. You need to go see how Jesus handled the skeptics. I have not yet reached His height of toughness. I actually pray for you atheists and fellow Christians before logging in. However, I am not compelled to show respect for insults against God or His word, or His messengers. Respect means to allow alongside. I won't do that, and have no commandment to do that. Your insults will continue to be met with truth.
OnceConvinced wrote:Gal 5:22-26 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law. And they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts. If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit. Let us not be desirous of vain glory, provoking one another, envying one another
The "one another" there is between brethren in the Lord. I am sticking to the same level of response Jesus employed. You obviously don't have a clue as to the meanings of those virtues of the Fruit. They are not defined by the world, but by God. Paul, His chief apostle, teaches not to act like a wimp before atheists. I have marked you per his command and in effect have nothing to do with you except present the gospel that perhaps you might be saved.
OnceConvinced wrote:Let me wrap this all up to keep it relevent to the thread. Yes, let's accept the bible as an authority but lets not attempt to use it to support our own personal agendas and let's not assume it is the infallible word of God.
Ah, but this sub forum doesn't allow for that last part, rejecting infallibility. The Bible is self declarative about that.
OnceConvinced wrote:Because it quite clearly is not. Let's be aware that other people's interpretations of it are different to ours and just because those people disagree, or just because those people are atheists (which BTW I am not), does not mean they are fools, nor does it mean they don't understand. It's all to do with PERSPECTIVE.
No private interpretations can trump the standalone authority of the plainly written word of God. I am citing it word for word in context, yet you persist in claiming it is not valid. That defies the intent of this sub forum. As for the perspective aof a athiest that doesn't have a clue to what the Bible says, no sane person should take any perspective the atheists have unless somehow successfully using the scriptures successfully.

So why not give it a shot? Come on, give it your best try. WHERE is my perspective contrary to the Bible, and WHERE is any perspective of any atheist remotely similar to anything the Bible says?

You keep indicating my perspective is wrong. How so? By the world's standard? Of course I differ from the world view. By the Bible message? No.

Prove me wrong. Since I cite the Bible you will have to use the Bible to do that since it is accepted here the Bible is God's perspective, not man's.

Word_Swordsman
Scholar
Posts: 296
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:15 pm
Location: Arkansas

Re: Subforum assumption, Bible authority

Post #29

Post by Word_Swordsman »

OnceConvinced wrote:
Word_Swordsman wrote: Using the Bible as a source not needing defense here (which it doesn't need anywhere), the Bible is self-declarative concerning inspiration from God to men to write His words in Job 32:8 "But there is a spirit in man: and the inspiration of the Almighty giveth them understanding." and in 2 Tim. 3:16 "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:"
OnceConvinced wrote:The thing is the Holy Spirit is not able to bring unity amongst Christians. We have numerous Christians who come through here believing they have true understanding of scripture, but yet they all believe different things. Where's the unity? If the Holy Spirit really did show Christians understanding there would be no arguments amongst them. But there is. None of them can agree! So how can any Christian be taken seriously when they claim the bible says a certain thing, when other Christians claim it says something different?
God was revealed sometimes with thunderings and earthquakes, but also by a small still voice as in 1 Kings 19:12 "And after the earthquake a fire; but the Lord was not in the fire: and after the fire a still small voice."

Many thinking themselves to hear God listen for the roarings, failing to detect the Holy Spirit. It isn't a failure of the Spirit, but of dull hearts of men. There is great unity in the Church over most of the major doctrines, but God is also allowing men thinking themselves Christians to go their own ways contrary to His word. You focus on the failures, while I focus on the Word. Any judgment of what is believed should properly be compared to that word. I find a lot of variance between atheists, agnostics, and skeptics in general, all having nothing in common with Bible knowledge.

What I say is subject to analysis of the word of God. I am not commanded to align myself with what men have to say, but what God said. Another troublesome thing you are encountering is many members of any sect feel compelled to cite sect doctrines in spite of what the Bible says. Ministers on their payrolls are trapped into parroting what their peers say. So it is many are forced to accept abominable acts like ordaining homosexuals in an effort to get along with the world {kosmos).
OnceConvinced wrote:Can you see that nobody is going to take anyone seriously who claims they have holy-spirit lead understanding? Why should you for instance be taken any more seriously than other Christians here who claim to have Holy Spirit understanding?
That is expected, experienced by Jesus in the midst of a large number of Jewish priests, Pharisees, scribes, and others of national authority. He stood alone exposing their false doctrines in Matthew 3:7 "But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?"

Matthew 12:34 "O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh."

Here's a big one full of name-calling by jesus, who exemplifies God's perspective of love for enemies.
Matthew 23:13-39 "But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in. [14] Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation. [15] Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves. [16] Woe unto you, ye blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor! [17] Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gold, or the temple that sanctifieth the gold? [18] And, Whosoever shall swear by the altar, it is nothing; but whosoever sweareth by the gift that is upon it, he is guilty. [19] Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gift, or the altar that sanctifieth the gift? [20] Whoso therefore shall swear by the altar, sweareth by it, and by all things thereon. [21] And whoso shall swear by the temple, sweareth by it, and by him that dwelleth therein. [22] And he that shall swear by heaven, sweareth by the throne of God, and by him that sitteth thereon. [23] Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone. [24] Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel. [25] Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess. [26] Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also. [27] Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres (painted/decorated tomb stones), which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness. [28] Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity. [29] Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous, [30] And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. [31] Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets. [32] Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. [33] Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?
[34] Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city: [35] That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar. [36] Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation (they did happen as prophesied, AD 70). [37] O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! [38] Behold, your house is left unto you desolate. [39] For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord."

I just love Jesus' honesty and courage. He was loving them. You won't understand God's love until in Christ. I follow Jesus in His word and deeds, increasingly every year of my life. He is my role model. The Holy Spirit is my guide.

I must not be taken seriously if sound to oppose the word of God as recorded in the Bible. None of you have succeeded in proving me to be wrong concerning the Bible. Your only possession is finding me opposing your lame opinions with no basis other than faulty reasonings.

User avatar
daedalus 2.0
Banned
Banned
Posts: 1000
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:52 pm
Location: NYC

Re: Subforum assumption, Bible authority

Post #30

Post by daedalus 2.0 »

Word_Swordsman wrote:Matthew 7:21-24 "Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. [22] Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? [23] And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity. [24] Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock:"
Joel 2:32
Whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be delivered.

Acts 2:21, Romans 10:13
Whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved.

“He Himself is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the whole world� (1 John 2:2).

�If you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved… For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek, for the same Lord over all is rich to all who call upon Him. For whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved� (Romans 10:9-13).

“If anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; old things have passed away; behold, all things have become new� (2 Corinthians 5:17).

God is Just - he has punished all of Man's sins through the sacrifice of Jesus. Including Hitler's. If Hitler accepted Jesus, that is enough.

Jesus died for everyones sins - including Moses AND Hitler's. And one is not saved by works, but by faith.

16:15 And he (Jesus) said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. "Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature."
16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. (believe in the resurrection; the idea that Jesus died for everyones sins; the gospel)



Matthew 7 was clearly referring to the OT (Jeremiah 14:12; Ezekiel 8:18; Micah 3:4) and is not speaking of the new covenant of the NT.



See how easily your false witness is discovered, WS?

Why don't you believe in the perfect redemption of Jesus?





BTW, I accept your acknowlgement of my excellent hits by declaring touche' - or did you mean to credit yourself for good "hits" and use "touche"" the wrong way?

Perhaps NOW you mean to say "touche'"?
Imagine the people who believe ... and not ashamed to ignore, totally, all the patient findings of thinking minds through all the centuries since the Bible.... It is these ignorant people�who would force their feeble and childish beliefs on us...I.Asimov

Post Reply