.
A challenge: Present a numbered and precise list of rules of debate to be applied to a debate (possibly H2H) that would allow a Theist to successfully defend the "resurrection" as a literal, truthful, accurate account of an event that happened in the real world.
Note: If citing "historical standards" specify exactly, verbatim what standards apply.
Rules of debate for "resurrection"
Moderator: Moderators
-
Zzyzx
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 25089
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:38 pm
- Location: Bible Belt USA
- Has thanked: 40 times
- Been thanked: 73 times
Rules of debate for "resurrection"
Post #1.
Non-Theist
ANY of the thousands of "gods" proposed, imagined, worshiped, loved, feared, and/or fought over by humans MAY exist -- awaiting verifiable evidence
Non-Theist
ANY of the thousands of "gods" proposed, imagined, worshiped, loved, feared, and/or fought over by humans MAY exist -- awaiting verifiable evidence
-
Talishi
- Guru
- Posts: 1156
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 11:31 pm
- Location: Seattle
- Been thanked: 2 times
- Contact:
Re: Rules of debate for "resurrection"
Post #21. Both sides agree that Matthew and John were written by the disciples they were named after, and so are eyewitness accounts of the death and resurrection of Jesus.Zzyzx wrote:A challenge: Present a numbered and precise list of rules of debate to be applied to a debate (possibly H2H) that would allow a Theist to successfully defend the "resurrection" as a literal, truthful, accurate account of an event that happened in the real world.
2. Both sides agree that the Upper Room in John, where he says Jesus first met the disciples after the resurrection is actually located on a mountain in Galilee where Matthew says Jesus first met the disciples after the resurrection.
3. Both sides agree that defining death as the "irreversible cessation of life" is not a firm definition.
