Does this relate to what we observe in debate & elsewher

Chat viewable by general public

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
Zzyzx
Site Supporter
Posts: 25089
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:38 pm
Location: Bible Belt USA
Has thanked: 40 times
Been thanked: 73 times

Does this relate to what we observe in debate & elsewher

Post #1

Post by Zzyzx »

.
Does this relate to what we observe in debate and elsewhere?
Analyzing the results, the researchers found that people with both relatively higher and lower levels of cognitive ability show approximately equal levels of intergroup bias, but towards different sets of groups.

People with low cognitive ability tended to express prejudice towards groups perceived as liberal and unconventional (e.g., atheists, gays and lesbians), as well as groups of people perceived as having low choice over group membership (e.g., ethnic minorities).

People with high cognitive ability showed the reverse pattern. They tended to express prejudice towards groups perceived as conservative and conventional (e.g., Christians, the military, big business).
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2 ... 110921.htm
.
Non-Theist

ANY of the thousands of "gods" proposed, imagined, worshiped, loved, feared, and/or fought over by humans MAY exist -- awaiting verifiable evidence

User avatar
Divine Insight
Savant
Posts: 18070
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:59 pm
Location: Here & Now
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Does this relate to what we observe in debate & else

Post #2

Post by Divine Insight »

I don't agree with the conclusion. However, I'm not the least bit surprised by the results of the study.

I would argue that referring to these biases as 'prejudice' is simply incorrect. I would argue that what's actually going on is that both of these groups are simply favoring the conclusions that they have come to believe are correct. And that is not 'prejudice', it's simply a rational conclusion based upon the understanding a person believes they already have concerning what the world should be like, etc.

However, what these studies do appear to be revealing is that people who have low cognitive abilities tend to be conservative and most likely affiliated with a religion or some other highly authoritative group, whilst people who have high cognitive abilities tend to be liberal and have a capacity to understand the plight of individuals who tend to be "unconventional" or minority.

Why these psychologists would confuse this with prejudice is beyond me. Apparently they must have started out attempting to study prejudice and just never realized that their study really has nothing to do with prejudice. That's a very common type of error that plagues many studies.

But what the study clearly shows is that people who have higher cognitive abilities tend to be liberal. I think that's really all that needs to be said. :D
[center]Image
Spiritual Growth - A person's continual assessment
of how well they believe they are doing
relative to what they believe a personal God expects of them.
[/center]

Post Reply