Creationist: Darwinists' Recent Claims Suggest Desperation

[Bart007]

Creationist Says Darwinists' Recent Claims Suggest Desperation
By Allie Martin
January 5, 2006

(AgapePress) - The founder of the creationist group Answers in Genesis (AIG) says a recent announcement by the journal Science claiming evolution was the top scientific breakthrough of 2005 shows how desperate the proponents of the theory of evolution are becoming.

Editors of Science cited wide ranging research, including a study showing a four percent difference between human and chimpanzee DNA, as major factors contributing to its decision to make its bold proclamation regarding 2005 and scientific discoveries supposedly offering support for Darwin's theory. However, Ken Ham, the president and founder of AIG, says the journal's announcement shows that secular humanists are worried about the increasing availability of information that contradicts their ideas about evolution.

"Why are they proclaiming 2005 the 'Year of Evolution' and all these big breakthroughs in evolution?" Ham asks. "Well, I believe it's because a creationist ministry like Answers in Genesis has put so much information out there, and we've got the Creation Museum under construction. I think what's happened is that it's made such an impact on the culture, the humanists are running scared."

The creation science advocate believes evolutionists are trying to declare 2005 as a year of breakthroughs for evolution in order to push the evolution on an increasingly disabused public with unprecedented access to scientific data supporting creationism. "We're getting information out there, and once people get this information, they can see that evolution is totally bankrupt," he asserts.

As for the scientific establishment's claims about the similarities between the genetic code of apes and humans, the AIG spokesman points out, "When you look at DNA, it consists of what are called base pairs, and there's three billion of them in human DNA. Do you realize a four percent difference means 120 million differences? That's an enormous difference. That, in itself, is very, very significant, even if the 'four percent' was real. but the four percent, as I've said, is a very arbitrary figure."

Given the opportunity, Ham contends he can debunk nearly all of Darwinists' arguments for evolution in a 40-minute lecture. He says secular humanists are aware of the many challenges posed to their pet theory by creationists -- and he believes they are increasingly alarmed and desperate to fight back, even with empty declarations and false assertions about "the year of evolution."

[Lotan]

BTW...you always start out your post calling me a liar.

I never have, nor have I this time. I said that the sentence that you pasted was a lie. Do you understand the difference?

[Sender]

BTW...you always start out your post calling me a liar.

I never have, nor have I this time. I said that the sentence that you pasted was a lie. Do you understand the difference?

Yes I do. Please stop doing that as well. Its been automatic with you. Thanks in advance, lets keep OT.

If you are going to say it is a lie, take it point by point and tell me why.

[Lotan]

BTW...you always start out your post calling me a liar.

Prove it.

I know and everybody else knows you think I am a liar, noted, ok?

Prove it.

Please stop doing that as well. Its been automatic with you.

Prove it.

[micatala]

A little more moderator intervention.

Yes, there is a difference between saying 'you are a liar' and 'this statement of yours is a lie.'

However, in the spirit of civility, it would behoove all participants to try and couch such statements in language that is less inflammatory rather than more. If a member feels a certain statement is not true, it is fine to state that 'it is not true' or 'it is false' etc. and then give reasons or support as to why you think so.

Posts that consist of little more than 'this is a lie' or 'is not' etc. do not serve much of a useful purpose.