The Gay Denomination.
For those people that desire same gender sexual behavior or thoughts, AND that claim to be a Christian and claim that their beliefs and theology can fit the New Testament witness, instead of waging an endless, fruitless and vicious war on other Christians - that will NEVER accept their gay doctrines and dogmas . . ., - why won't they just declare a new and alternative denomination, just like Watch Tower theological adherants and Mormons?
Why the need to join forces with anti-Christian and secularist movements to attack "Bible believing" Christians?
Afterall, in referencing the New Testament, there is no justifiable comparison of sex acts to being a slave (slavery), or the charge of bigotry and hatefulness in holding that marriage is a man and a woman.
Why not just start an "Out and Proud" Gay Denomination?
The Gay Denomination?
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Banned
- Posts: 3083
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 9:49 am
Post #41
Please show me the scripture that states the RRC is the only true church.Silenceinmotion: The Catholic Church IS Christianity. It is the correct definition and practice of the religion of Christ. Scripture gives overwhelming evidence of such and even declares others as heretics right on.
Post #42
Don't blame Matthew for your delusion.SilenceInMotion wrote:
Matthew 16:18
And I say also to you, That you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
Post #43
If TRCC is the correct practice of Christ, I'd also like to see where Christ moved around child molestors so they couldn't be found out.kayky wrote:Please show me the scripture that states the RRC is the only true church.Silenceinmotion: The Catholic Church IS Christianity. It is the correct definition and practice of the religion of Christ. Scripture gives overwhelming evidence of such and even declares others as heretics right on.

-
- Banned
- Posts: 3083
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 9:49 am
Post #45
Here:KCKID wrote: I wonder ...WWJD?
Some Pharisees came to him to test him. They asked, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason?�
“Haven’t you read,� he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’ 5 and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’?
So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.�
- Matthew 19
So as even you can see, there is not even such a thng as same gender marriage to God.
Those "Christians" that want to invent new doctrines and theology, should do so in a new denomination or religious movement altogether.
And by the way, I notice that these homosexuality approving places are quite fundamentalist in aproach and death grip on being challenged.
Post #46
Technically, same sex marriage wasn't the subject of the question so you can't use this to say that god is against same sex marriage.99percentatheism wrote:Here:KCKID wrote: I wonder ...WWJD?
Some Pharisees came to him to test him. They asked, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason?�
“Haven’t you read,� he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’ 5 and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’?
So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.�
- Matthew 19
So as even you can see, there is not even such a thng as same gender marriage to God.
Those "Christians" that want to invent new doctrines and theology, should do so in a new denomination or religious movement altogether.
And by the way, I notice that these homosexuality approving places are quite fundamentalist in aproach and death grip on being challenged.
Of course, you can infer it, but you can infer a whole lotta' stuff in the bible if one would like. We could infer that jesus didn't accept anything written in the NT past the four gospels.
I'm sure you also have known every single "homosexuality approving place" so you can speak for them all, yes?

-
- Banned
- Posts: 3083
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 9:49 am
Post #47
connermt wrote:Technically, same sex marriage wasn't the subject of the question so you can't use this to say that god is against same sex marriage.99percentatheism wrote:Here:KCKID wrote: I wonder ...WWJD?
Some Pharisees came to him to test him. They asked, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason?�
“Haven’t you read,� he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’ 5 and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’?
So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.�
- Matthew 19
So as even you can see, there is not even such a thng as same gender marriage to God.
Those "Christians" that want to invent new doctrines and theology, should do so in a new denomination or religious movement altogether.
And by the way, I notice that these homosexuality approving places are quite fundamentalist in aproach and death grip on being challenged.
Of course, you can infer it, but you can infer a whole lotta' stuff in the bible if one would like. We could infer that jesus didn't accept anything written in the NT past the four gospels.
I'm sure you also have known every single "homosexuality approving place" so you can speak for them all, yes?
You have no Christian dog in this hunt. Why are you chiming in?
If you could show ANY support from the Tanakh for same gende marriage then maybe you'ld have an appropriate place to start. But alas, homosexuality is even worse from the law of Moses than it is the Gospels.
Any Hasidic or Orthodox Sages that you could present that would lend support for gay sex?
"FOR THIS REASON . . ."
What a marriage IS.
My use of the scripture is perfect for application in some alternative theology religion to stand up as a seperate and seperated group.
Post #48
1) To point out your incredibly flawed logic. And to make sense of the senseless99percentatheism wrote:connermt wrote:Technically, same sex marriage wasn't the subject of the question so you can't use this to say that god is against same sex marriage.99percentatheism wrote:Here:KCKID wrote: I wonder ...WWJD?
Some Pharisees came to him to test him. They asked, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason?�
“Haven’t you read,� he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’ 5 and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’?
So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.�
- Matthew 19
So as even you can see, there is not even such a thng as same gender marriage to God.
Those "Christians" that want to invent new doctrines and theology, should do so in a new denomination or religious movement altogether.
And by the way, I notice that these homosexuality approving places are quite fundamentalist in aproach and death grip on being challenged.
Of course, you can infer it, but you can infer a whole lotta' stuff in the bible if one would like. We could infer that jesus didn't accept anything written in the NT past the four gospels.
I'm sure you also have known every single "homosexuality approving place" so you can speak for them all, yes?
1) You have no Christian dog in this hunt. Why are you chiming in?
2) If you could show ANY support from the Tanakh for same gende marriage then maybe you'ld have an appropriate place to start. But alas, homosexuality is even worse from the law of Moses than it is the Gospels.
3) Any Hasidic or Orthodox Sages that you could present that would lend support for gay sex?
2) No support for any religious group that tries to make the lives of others difficult thru antiquated beliefs of supernatural beings, talking burning bushes, flying carpet riders, etc
3) Why would I? That makes as little sense as your above claim.

-
- Banned
- Posts: 3083
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 9:49 am
Post #49
Homosexuals you mean? Why did the pro homosexuals in the RCC keep moving around the other homosexuals that went after boys?connermt wrote:If TRCC is the correct practice of Christ, I'd also like to see where Christ moved around child molestors so they couldn't be found out.kayky wrote:Please show me the scripture that states the RRC is the only true church.Silenceinmotion: The Catholic Church IS Christianity. It is the correct definition and practice of the religion of Christ. Scripture gives overwhelming evidence of such and even declares others as heretics right on.
There is a good reason why Evangelicals have such tredpidation about having homosexuality condoned.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 3083
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 9:49 am
Post #50
In other words, yiou only have subterfuge to offer.connermt wrote:1) To point out your incredibly flawed logic. And to make sense of the senseless99percentatheism wrote:connermt wrote:Technically, same sex marriage wasn't the subject of the question so you can't use this to say that god is against same sex marriage.99percentatheism wrote:Here:KCKID wrote: I wonder ...WWJD?
Some Pharisees came to him to test him. They asked, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason?�
“Haven’t you read,� he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’ 5 and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’?
So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.�
- Matthew 19
So as even you can see, there is not even such a thng as same gender marriage to God.
Those "Christians" that want to invent new doctrines and theology, should do so in a new denomination or religious movement altogether.
And by the way, I notice that these homosexuality approving places are quite fundamentalist in aproach and death grip on being challenged.
Of course, you can infer it, but you can infer a whole lotta' stuff in the bible if one would like. We could infer that jesus didn't accept anything written in the NT past the four gospels.
I'm sure you also have known every single "homosexuality approving place" so you can speak for them all, yes?
1) You have no Christian dog in this hunt. Why are you chiming in?
2) If you could show ANY support from the Tanakh for same gende marriage then maybe you'ld have an appropriate place to start. But alas, homosexuality is even worse from the law of Moses than it is the Gospels.
3) Any Hasidic or Orthodox Sages that you could present that would lend support for gay sex?
2) No support for any religious group that tries to make the lives of others difficult thru antiquated beliefs of supernatural beings, talking burning bushes, flying carpet riders, etc
3) Why would I? That makes as little sense as your above claim.
And of course discarding Biblical religion for some new gay liberation religion.
How ancient idoloatry is that.