Hello, I just joined this forum.
I grew up in a family that was catholic and attended church regularly but never really read the bible much.
I now have decided to learn the bible and am looking for a local non denominational church but also have begun watching Joel Osteen on TV.
What I'd like to know is which version of the bible should I read? I have seen King James, American Standard Version, and New International Version.
Which version of the bible should I read?
Moderator: Moderators
- otseng
- Savant
- Posts: 20849
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
- Has thanked: 214 times
- Been thanked: 365 times
- Contact:
Post #2
Welcome to the forum.
Any of the versions you mentioned would be good. But, if I were to pick one, it'd be NAS. The Amplified Bible is also a good one (which is what I'm using now).
I'm also now listening to Andy Stanley podcasts, which I would recommend to anybody.
Any of the versions you mentioned would be good. But, if I were to pick one, it'd be NAS. The Amplified Bible is also a good one (which is what I'm using now).
I'm also now listening to Andy Stanley podcasts, which I would recommend to anybody.
- JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2573 times
Post #3
Welcome to the forums John. Here's a link to a (computer) bible study program that I use for looking up passages and phrases. It can be loaded with several different bible versions (I have KJV and WEB). I'm not affiliated with it in any way, I just recommend it for ease of use.
Xiphos formerly gnomesword homepage
Xiphos formerly gnomesword download page
Xiphos formerly gnomesword homepage
Xiphos formerly gnomesword download page
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin
-Punkinhead Martin
- OnceConvinced
- Savant
- Posts: 8969
- Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:22 pm
- Location: New Zealand
- Has thanked: 50 times
- Been thanked: 67 times
- Contact:
Post #4
According to Wikepedia there are over 450 English translations alone, all translated by fallible human beings. Nobody can seem to agree on what is the best translation all though Otseng here does point you to some of the more popular translations. However there is no guarantee you are going to get the correct meanings of the original Hebrew texts. And the way Christians continual refer to the original words and reinterpret them would suggest that no English translation can really be relied upon.
The best thing to do is to learn the original languages. Hebrew in particular must be learnt thoroughly, because it is one of the most difficult languages to learn and it's very easy to mistranslate. It could take you several years to master the language to be able to correctly translate God's word.
Of course you then have to prove that the original texts are indeed God's word and not just the ramblings of fallible man.
Good luck!
The best thing to do is to learn the original languages. Hebrew in particular must be learnt thoroughly, because it is one of the most difficult languages to learn and it's very easy to mistranslate. It could take you several years to master the language to be able to correctly translate God's word.
Of course you then have to prove that the original texts are indeed God's word and not just the ramblings of fallible man.
Good luck!
Society and its morals evolve and will continue to evolve. The bible however remains the same and just requires more and more apologetics and claims of "metaphors" and "symbolism" to justify it.
Prayer is like rubbing an old bottle and hoping that a genie will pop out and grant you three wishes.
There is much about this world that is mind boggling and impressive, but I see no need whatsoever to put it down to magical super powered beings.
Check out my website: Recker's World
- McCulloch
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24063
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
- Location: Toronto, ON, CA
- Been thanked: 3 times
Post #5
I read the NASB when I was a Christian. It is considered a conservative, if somewhat literal, translation. I am no longer a Christian, so you might not want to take my recommendation. 

Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
- OnceConvinced
- Savant
- Posts: 8969
- Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:22 pm
- Location: New Zealand
- Has thanked: 50 times
- Been thanked: 67 times
- Contact:
Post #6
Actually that's the version I've got now, the very same bible I got for Christmas when I was 16 years old. It's very well worn with plenty of tidy markings and underlinings. In recent times I've added a lot of circles to note the attrocities and absurdities and written in scrawls next to them.McCulloch wrote:I read the NASB when I was a Christian. It is considered a conservative, if somewhat literal, translation. I am no longer a Christian, so you might not want to take my recommendation.

BTW John, welcome to the forum. I hope you find a bible that suits you. Don't mind me, I'm just in one of those moods where I'm enjoying being a complete b'stard. Otseng is a good guy, he can be trusted and wouldn't deliberately put you crook.
Society and its morals evolve and will continue to evolve. The bible however remains the same and just requires more and more apologetics and claims of "metaphors" and "symbolism" to justify it.
Prayer is like rubbing an old bottle and hoping that a genie will pop out and grant you three wishes.
There is much about this world that is mind boggling and impressive, but I see no need whatsoever to put it down to magical super powered beings.
Check out my website: Recker's World
Re: Which version of the bible should I read?
Post #7Welcome to the forum, John. I'm the resident liberal Jew, formerly a Methodist minister.
Learning the original languages is of course the ideal, but mastering Koine Greek and paricularly Biblical Hebrew is realistically the work of decades, not years. I have studied both, and they are even more challenging than they look. I don't know if the increase in understanding would really be worth the effort.
There are other alternatives. Personally, I think the version that one uses is less important than whether or not it is a good study Bible that contains marginal notes, cross-references, alternate readings and commentary. Any major publisher can provide such a Bible - Collins, Zondervan, Cokesbury, InterVarsity - and I particularly recommend the Oxford.
You can get multivolume commentaries on the separate books, too, and general one-volume "Introductions" to both Old and New Testaments. For the Jewish point of view, the Jewish Publication Society's Jewish Study Bible is worth having for reference, too. I would (and have, and do) own several different study Bibles and commentaries and work with all of them.
No matter what version you read - and you should have several - commentary and notes are vitally important. You can find them from both liberal and conservative points of view, and from neutral stances that give both and everything in between. If you're serious about Bible study, you need a bookshelf, not just one book.
Learning the original languages is of course the ideal, but mastering Koine Greek and paricularly Biblical Hebrew is realistically the work of decades, not years. I have studied both, and they are even more challenging than they look. I don't know if the increase in understanding would really be worth the effort.
There are other alternatives. Personally, I think the version that one uses is less important than whether or not it is a good study Bible that contains marginal notes, cross-references, alternate readings and commentary. Any major publisher can provide such a Bible - Collins, Zondervan, Cokesbury, InterVarsity - and I particularly recommend the Oxford.
You can get multivolume commentaries on the separate books, too, and general one-volume "Introductions" to both Old and New Testaments. For the Jewish point of view, the Jewish Publication Society's Jewish Study Bible is worth having for reference, too. I would (and have, and do) own several different study Bibles and commentaries and work with all of them.
No matter what version you read - and you should have several - commentary and notes are vitally important. You can find them from both liberal and conservative points of view, and from neutral stances that give both and everything in between. If you're serious about Bible study, you need a bookshelf, not just one book.
-
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 25089
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:38 pm
- Location: Bible Belt USA
- Has thanked: 40 times
- Been thanked: 73 times
Post #8
.
Hi John,
Welcome to the forum. You are getting advice above from some of the most respected members of the forum. I cannot add anything to what they say.
Hi John,
Welcome to the forum. You are getting advice above from some of the most respected members of the forum. I cannot add anything to what they say.
.
Non-Theist
ANY of the thousands of "gods" proposed, imagined, worshiped, loved, feared, and/or fought over by humans MAY exist -- awaiting verifiable evidence
Non-Theist
ANY of the thousands of "gods" proposed, imagined, worshiped, loved, feared, and/or fought over by humans MAY exist -- awaiting verifiable evidence
Post #9
Thank you for all of the above advice. It definitely will help me a lot. I am looking at options for online bibles and even a bible I can download for the iPod touch. Most of them have different versions so I should be able to use that for my bible reading. Thank you again.
- Nilloc James
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 1696
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 1:53 am
- Location: Canada
Post #10
And remember, just because a bible looks old does not mean it was acuurately translated. Some of the newer ones are better/ more accurate.