Cathar1950 wrote:cnorman18 wrote: The OT says no such thing or anything like it. In Jewish tradition, the standards are higher for Jews than for non-Jews. We have 613 commandments; you guys have seven. If it turns out that we ARE talking about who gets into Heaven, Gentiles will have an easier time of it than we will. We don't get preferred seating.
Some Jews might think you have 613 and gentiles have 7 but that would be only true to the Jew that thought that not a reality beyond the Jewish beliefs.
Uh, obviously.
Even religious Jews don't read that literally. 613 is a symbolic number, and the 7 Noachide laws are merely a traditional formulation of basic ethics that very few would disagree with, excepting the prohibition of blasphemy that is of course meaningless to non-theists.
Not every Jew follows all 613 commandment and some don't even follow the 7.
NO Jew follows all 613 commandments; that is impossible today.
And of course, any Jew who steals or murders, e.g., would be in violation of the 7.
Your point?
I don't think that because you have more rules and it is harder for Jews to be Jewish is a valid argument for not being elitist...
Only if you stipulate that any group that has any standards of behavior whatever for itself is equally "elitist," and that that is always and everywhere a bad thing. .
...but it does show just what lengths they will go to show they are the elect.
Show me anywnere in Jewish teaching or tradition that that word has ever been used. It was dealt with in my previous post, and it does not apply.
Show that having higher standards of behavior constitutes claiming to be the "elect."
The Hebrew writers take both positions one that they are chosen and a special people and those that felt they were not following God's commandments as deserving death enough that they felt it was the cause of all their woes.
And how are the opinions of people who lived 2,000 and more years ago relevant to the Jews of today?
If you want to know anything about Jews and Judaism - which is rather incumbent upon anone who presumes to judge either -
reading the Hebrew Bible is not enough. Find out what we say
about that Bible.
We no longer teach that massacring whole villages was the right thing to do. We no longer teach that God rewards or punishes either individuals or whole peoples according to their behavior (actually, that one was never agreed on from the beginning; Job is probably the oldest book in the Bible).
And you know what? We don't slaughter bulls and sheep and pigeons and burn them any more, either.
When you read the Bible, you are not reading either our teachings or our character. I don't understand why this concept is so difficult.
We shouldn't whitewash the problems just because someone poorly chose racist as a categorical fault.
Can we establish that there actually IS a problem first?
I have been saying since I came here that Jews teach the equality and dignity and value of ALL people, and at least as directly and passionately as any other religion I know of. We do not consider ourselves holier or more beloved by God or more ethical or blessed or superior to any other people in any way. Read any book on Judaism written a Jew and it will tell you the same thing.
I note again; the assumption behind every criticism on this thread is that Jews, myself included, routinely and deliberately lie to Gentiles about our beliefs and teachings.
And I ask again if we can examine the truth of that assumption and its implications.
When a Christian of whatever variety talks about what Christians believe, it's common enough for others to say "You're wrong" - but how often has anyone said "
THAT'S not what you really believe - what you really believe is THIS"?
When one asks what Jews believe, and a well-read Jew answers, why is that answer so often dismissed or discounted here?
Can anyone give me a reason for that, other than
"Jews lie"?
And if that IS the assumption, will anyone here ever have the stones to stand up on their hind legs and admit it openly?