I’d like to explore a theme that appears repeatedly in both the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament, yet rarely gets discussed head-on:
Does God’s blessing (or covenant) stay with a people forever simply because of their ancestry,
or does it hinge on their continued obedience to Him?
Why I think the question matters
- Justice & mercy. If God is perfectly just, it seems only fair that a rebellious nation could forfeit special privileges, while an obedient nation—whatever its pedigree—could be granted favor.
- Prophetic passages. Several texts appear to warn ancient Israel that disobedience would lead to blessings being removed or transferred.
- Continuity vs. continuity-plus-change. Christians, Jews, and Muslims each affirm God’s fidelity, yet differ on how He continues His plan when humans fail.
Blessing initially promised to Abraham’s two sons Genesis 17 : 20 (Ishmael); Genesis 17 : 21 (Isaac)
Blessing contingent on obedience Deuteronomy 28 : 1–2 / 15; Jeremiah 7 : 3–7
Warning of transfer Matthew 21 : 43
One God over all peoples Zechariah 14 : 9; Mark 12 : 29kingdom… taken from you and given to a nation producing its fruits
Feel free to add other verses—these are just conversation starters.The Lord our God is One Lord
Lastly three honest questions to the forum
1. Does Scripture anywhere say that Abraham’s non-Isaac line (e.g., through Ishmael) lost its blessing, or are we merely assuming so?
2. When Jesus speaks of the kingdom being “taken… and given to another nation,” do you read that as metaphorical, eschatological, or potentially literal?
3. If blessings are conditional, what criteria—in your view—would mark a people today as legitimate heirs of God’s covenant?
Ground rules for the thread
- Please keep replies focused on —texts and principles—, not personal labels.
- I’m genuinely interested in everyone’s viewpoint—Jewish, Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox, Muslim, or skeptic.
- One point at a time keeps the conversation clear for readers.
Looking forward to learning from you all!