- The Unmoved Mover
- The Uncaused Cause
- The Cosmological Argument
- The Argument from Degree
- The Argument from Design (Teleological Argument)
- The Ontological Argument
- The Argument from Beauty
- The Argument from Personal Experience
- The Argument from Scripture
- The Argument from Admired Religious Scientists
- Pascal's Wager
- Bayesian Arguments
Does Dawkins adequately refute the arguments for God's existence in this chapter?
I'll also repost McCulloch's questions:
- Does God provide a natural terminator to the infinite regresses?
- Is there any validity to Anselm's Ontological Argument?
- Is the Argument from Beauty valid?
- Is the Argument from Personal Experience valid? Is it being used or is this Dawkins' strawman?
- Is the Argument from Scripture valid? Is this another strawman?
- Does anyone use the Argument from Admired Religious Scientists?
- Let's not re-do Pascal's Wager
- Is there any validity to Bayesian Arguments promoted by people such as Stephen Unwin?
- Did Dawkins leave out or misrepresent any major argument for God's existence?