Is church a good relationship killer?

Ethics, Morality, and Sin

Moderator: Moderators

Lostsoul
Student
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 6:08 pm

Is church a good relationship killer?

Post #1

Post by Lostsoul »

I am a college sophomore and my now ex-gf is a HS junior. 3 years, 4 months and 9 days age difference. we have a problem however.

We attent two different nondenominational churches, and because of this, her father, and her mother have made me out to be a non-christian, and that i dont have jesus with me, and am bad person at heart. they have even told me this to me on the phone. (we have never met face to face)

What ended up happening was the my ex and i chose not to listen to her parents, but to sneak out to meet each other. (not at night. but like, walking to the park and such to talk)

the problem, is that her parents found out, and went on a rather rash spree, they cut us off, and turned most of my friends and her friends against me. now, most of the people i talk to believe i have done nothing but make this poor girl miserable, and have done nothing but cause her pain, and make her change for the worse.

i feel horrible, but since we have no contact, i cant explain my feelings.

I would like opinions on this, and wether the parents actions were appropriate for the situation(I.E. church being a defining factor to cancel a relationship.)

i know we could have handled her parents predjudice better, but, o well. idk. :(

User avatar
JoeyKnothead
Banned
Banned
Posts: 20879
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
Location: Here
Has thanked: 4093 times
Been thanked: 2573 times

Post #41

Post by JoeyKnothead »

At the risk of getting tomatoes thrown at me from some of the others, I say listen to ms. faith.

I would hope we were all approaching this from the idea this dude is genuine, there's too much at stake to think otherwise.

User avatar
Blaze
Site Supporter
Posts: 61
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 2:16 am
Location: Washington State

Post #42

Post by Blaze »

faith wrote:
Blaze"]
faith wrote:People withhold information because they know they will be judged and because people will not see it from the point of two people being in love.
You apparently relate to this, and feel the need to rationalize it... I don't think that this is useful in anyway. He wasn't "withholding information" he manipulated the information repeatedly when he didn't get the response he wanted. And if one feels the need to lie on an anonymous site... I mean under what circumstances exactly would one tell the truth?
Take your pschologist and psychiatrist hat off and stop trying to tell me what I rationalise or think because you would be wrong.
I do not relate to this at all. I have lived my life as an extremely honest person and I have sympathy and empathy for people being attacked. Your post picked out all the faults. Now tell me who can relate to what? :shock:
What happens on forums is people get put in boxes. This guy has probably been trying to work out what and where it is wrong. Hence the way he presented the information. Someone planning to deliberately manipulate or decieve would not have deviated in any way. This guys fear is what became apparent and having already been attacked was expecting the same.
faith wrote: So far everyone has nit-picked about the law

Not true... I didn't even mention the law. I focused on what he conveyed, the inconsistencies in his story, and his lack of integrity when responding to the challenge. I offered him insight into his own behaviors, and the perspective that this might be part of what's motivating dear-ol-dad.
Where as the evidence would show that dear-ol-dad is probably the cause of his behaviour not vice versa.
The problem for those that will manipulate, is that they get a false sense of success when their deceptions seemly go undetected... They don't realize that most people ARE noticing and are simply biting their tongue, being polite. The manipulator ends up with a skewed perspective regarding their behavior and how it is affecting their reputation and their life.
Again this is a relatively young man and he is obviously in a highly emotional frame of mind. Typical of you to think of deception and not the motivation behind his actions. Why should anyone need to bite their tongue. The guy may have other motives like hiding their identity and then giving the correct ages when he felt comfortable with the people he was discussing the matter with.
A little like the story that begins. " I have a friend who has this problem." the friend actually being themselves. It is not unsual for people trying to hide things relating to themselves.
The best thing this young man could do for himself and his future would be to commit to truth. If he were to affect this change, Dad might be impressed enough to reassess. If it held up, and proved out over time to be true and reliable, he might actually gain dear-ol-dad's respect, because that kind of change, if real, takes strength and courage. And, whether or not it changed anything in this particular situation, it would better his future period.
Again your assuming that he is dishonest. I am looking at his past reactions from people and the fact we are strangers. When in all truth there could be many reasons.
faith wrote: and the person who wrote the thread who was just looking for advice. Not one have asked them how they feel about each other or what they feel God is saying in all of this......
#5 honor your father and mother.
The word tells us " Do not bring your children to anger." So the word works both way. These are not babies they are young adults and should be treated as such.
They are being caused anguish in their lives.
faith wrote: If they don't want to share your love and happiness then tough. When you marry you become a seperate family anyway.
So tell the parents that unless they allow you to see each other now. That you will go to college and get all your qualifications then you will both leave and get married without inviting them and make your own lives without them.

I am sure given the ultimation they will re-consider their position
Wow, that has to be the worst advice ever! You actually suggest he threaten the family and that if they don't like it tough? That he run off and marry their daughter without inviting them? That he cut off and destroy the loving relationship between this girl and her parents? I am so shocked and disgusted, I don't know where to begin. Blessed are the peacemakers, eh faith?
Again read what I wrote about waiting and getting their education. Then getting married. Do you ever read anything properly. I had not advised them to run off before they finish their education. But to warn the parents they intend to do as they chose when the time is right. The worst advice was telling them to get pregnant. :shock: There is no loving relationship where a father is telling a woman whom she can and cannot see. Loving relationships trust each other. If he trusts his daughter then what is his problem?
If you had read the thread you would have seen I had given all the right advice.
But some parents are a nightmare and haven't a clue how to deal with these type of situtations. If this parent had been worth his salt. He would have let them see each other with ground rules in place.
So if you want to judge read all my posts and not just one. This was the final and the least of the options.

I guess it proves my point. You continually look for the worst in everything.

Love Faith.xx :)
THAT was your point? You are in no position to know anything at all about what I might or might not "continually" do.

Your difficulty with my assessment, is your problem. It's probable that the kid picked up what I was putting down. He may be processing it... or not. He may gain some insight... or not. How you leap to conclusions, fill in gaps, develop the characters beyond the concrete information, project, assume, read between the lines, through the lines, everything but the actual lines is not my concern. (e.g. how you think you know something is typical of me with zero actual knowledge.)

If you hadn't given such horrible advice I wouldn't of felt the need to respond. I responded out of concern that Lostsoul might still be reading the thread and take your advice which would ADD to his problem, not solve it. I left out your "qualifications" because it had nothing to do with the immediate family dilemma, i.e., his educational status was not part of the problem, nor was it relevant within your advice to tear the family relationships apart, other than perhaps once accomplished they would necessarily be able to provide for themselves.

Furthermore, I did not "assume" he was dishonest, he demonstrated it.

Further, furthermore, your not in a position to know whether they are "not babies" and "shouldn't be treated as such"... maturity has nothing to do with chronological age. What we do know however, is that the girl IS a minor and it is the fathers duty, if not desire to protect her and her future as best he can. The villain you would have the father to be, was not in evidence. Lostsoul relayed that 1) the girl felt her father to be a good guy and 2) that the father discussed his objections with him asking him to stay away from his daughter. That is a small window, but it does not reflect a villain, rather it reflects an involved and concerned father who has a reasonable relationship with his daughter.

Regarding your comment - that "the word tells us, do not bring your children to anger"[lest they be discouraged] and how that somehow trumps "honor your father and mother" or trumps the verse just prior to your Colossians reference "children obey your parents in all things"... or as you put it "so the word works both ways"... Well, I agree, and you have demonstrated that one can pick and choose scripture to support any position they desire... they can also claim personal revelation, or that they are "leaving it to God" in order to do exactly as they choose (actively or passively) and avoid responsibility for their choices. So what good is it? Why do you ask what God has to say, or what "the word" tells us, if you don't really have to follow it because one verse trumps another and it works both ways?

If you really believed in following "the word"... the father would have ultimate authority over his daughter (no age limit), including choosing whom she marries... and if she puts up a fuss and disobeys, he can just have her killed... according to "the word".

Please do regard my questions as rhetorical... given that I do not regard you as a source of wisdom, anything more you would have to say to me would be a waste of your time.
Whenever we read the obscene stories, the voluptuous debaucheries, the cruel and torturous executions..... I sincerely detest it, as I detest everything that is cruel. Thomas Paine

User avatar
faith
Scholar
Posts: 383
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 11:45 am
Location: United Kingdom.

Post #43

Post by faith »

Blaze"]

THAT was your point? You are in no position to know anything at all about what I might or might not "continually" do.
Your difficulty with my assessment, is your problem. It's probable that the kid picked up what I was putting down. He may be processing it... or not. He may gain some insight... or not. How you leap to conclusions, fill in gaps, develop the characters beyond the concrete information, project, assume, read between the lines, through the lines, everything but the actual lines is not my concern. (e.g. how you think you know something is typical of me with zero actual knowledge.)


Waffle, Waffle. Waffle...... Go and study you may actually learn something. :shock:

If you hadn't given such horrible advice I wouldn't of felt the need to respond. I responded out of concern that Lostsoul might still be reading the thread and take your advice which would ADD to his problem, not solve it. I left out your "qualifications" because it had nothing to do with the immediate family dilemma, i.e., his educational status was not part of the problem, nor was it relevant within your advice to tear the family relationships apart, other than perhaps once accomplished they would necessarily be able to provide for themselves.
Your sounding off because people do not agree with you. My advice was sound it allowed for every eventuality. You might want to learn about people and relationships before sounding off. You have a very negative attitude to everything and make matters worse, even on this thread you are still sounding off because you want to be right. Not very good from a person wanting to give out advice. :shock:
Furthermore, I did not "assume" he was dishonest, he demonstrated it.
Now your being dishonest. I said there could be reasons why he did not want to so open about his indentity and age. Reality check, no one only Jesus Christ was completely honest. Just as you demonstrate now by pretending not to understand what I actually said about his lads feelings. You are trying to make it a black and white situation omitting grey matter. If you get wound up by little things like this, you should not even be offering advice.
Further, furthermore, your not in a position to know whether they are "not babies" and "shouldn't be treated as such"... maturity has nothing to do with chronological age. What we do know however, is that the girl IS a minor and it is the fathers duty, if not desire to protect her and her future as best he can. The villain you would have the father to be, was not in evidence. Lostsoul relayed that 1) the girl felt her father to be a good guy and 2) that the father discussed his objections with him asking him to stay away from his daughter. That is a small window, but it does not reflect a villain, rather it reflects an involved and concerned father who has a reasonable relationship with his daughter.
If at first you cannot win then try blagging the argument by twisting it around to something else. :shock: If you raise your child correctly then you should be able to trust their own judgement and trust them to live their own lives.
We allowed for all sides in this conversation which was not about whether the father was a villain. It was about two people who loved each other but a Father wanted it all his way and was not prepared for them to see each other. You just want to make this about what you think. It is irrelevant because it is the good of these two people and their future which is the important aspect of this thread.
So stop bringing up things which are irrelevant.

Regarding your comment - that "the word tells us, do not bring your children to anger"[lest they be discouraged] and how that somehow trumps "honor your father and mother" or trumps the verse just prior to your Colossians reference "children obey your parents in all things"... or as you put it "so the word works both ways"... Well, I agree, and you have demonstrated that one can pick and choose scripture to support any position they desire... they can also claim personal revelation, or that they are "leaving it to God" in order to do exactly as they choose (actively or passively) and avoid responsibility for their choices. So what good is it? Why do you ask what God has to say, or what "the word" tells us, if you don't really have to follow it because one verse trumps another and it works both ways?
Wrong again... If your parents told you to go and commit murder, rape and robbery who do you obey? The word says a man and woman shall leave their families and become one flesh and independant of their families shall be a new family. I certainly would not want my Son at home obeying me when he is forty.
:shock: So when you know what your talking about in the bible then come back.
Instead of trying to twist everything your own. It is obvious even your knowledge of the bible is twisted to how you want to see things and life. It is not good for you or other people who have to read you. Lighten up a little and live.
If you really believed in following "the word"... the father would have ultimate authority over his daughter (no age limit), including choosing whom she marries... and if she puts up a fuss and disobeys, he can just have her killed... according to "the word".
The Word does not say this, are you a Jew or a Gentile?
You really need to read the bible. All are equal in Christ there is no difference between male and female, jew or gentile. Your behind the times. :shock:
Please do regard my questions as rhetorical... given that I do not regard you as a source of wisdom, anything more you would have to say to me would be a waste of your time.
What kind of wisdom writes this at the end. :lol: :P

The truth is your so annoyed that someone actually pulled your arguments apart that you have to try and justify yourself and then run away. Not very matur or wise when in a debate forum. Never mind, I am sure not having your replies will in effect not be of any loss. Probably a blessing by all accounts.

Love Faith.xx :D

User avatar
Jian^sia
Apprentice
Posts: 178
Joined: Mon May 17, 2004 3:15 am

Blaze and faith

Post #44

Post by Jian^sia »

Blaze wrote:
faith wrote: If they don't want to share your love and happiness then tough. When you marry you become a separate family anyway.
So tell the parents that unless they allow you to see each other now. That you will go to college and get all your qualifications then you will both leave and get married without inviting them and make your own lives without them.

I am sure given the ultimatum they will re-consider their position
Wow, that has to be the worst advice ever! You actually suggest he threaten the family and that if they don't like it tough? That he run off and marry their daughter without inviting them? That he cut off and destroy the loving relationship between this girl and her parents? I am so shocked and disgusted, I don't know where to begin. Blessed are the peacemakers, eh faith?
[/quote]
Allow me to say a word of justice. Blaze is right here.

User avatar
justifyothers
Site Supporter
Posts: 1764
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: Virginia, US
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Is church a good relationship killer?

Post #45

Post by justifyothers »

Lostsoul wrote:I am a college sophomore and my now ex-gf is a HS junior. 3 years, 4 months and 9 days age difference. we have a problem however.

We attent two different nondenominational churches, and because of this, her father, and her mother have made me out to be a non-christian, and that i dont have jesus with me, and am bad person at heart. they have even told me this to me on the phone. (we have never met face to face)

What ended up happening was the my ex and i chose not to listen to her parents, but to sneak out to meet each other. (not at night. but like, walking to the park and such to talk)

the problem, is that her parents found out, and went on a rather rash spree, they cut us off, and turned most of my friends and her friends against me. now, most of the people i talk to believe i have done nothing but make this poor girl miserable, and have done nothing but cause her pain, and make her change for the worse.

i feel horrible, but since we have no contact, i cant explain my feelings.

I would like opinions on this, and wether the parents actions were appropriate for the situation(I.E. church being a defining factor to cancel a relationship.)

i know we could have handled her parents predjudice better, but, o well. idk. :(
I've been reading through the posts here and I have a question...
Why haven't you met her parents in person? When I was 16, boys had to come in and pick me up, meet the folks, all that awkward stuff. You didn't need to do that? How did you guys date in the beginning?

User avatar
faith
Scholar
Posts: 383
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 11:45 am
Location: United Kingdom.

Re: Blaze and faith

Post #46

Post by faith »

Jian^sia wrote:
Blaze wrote:
faith wrote: If they don't want to share your love and happiness then tough. When you marry you become a separate family anyway.
So tell the parents that unless they allow you to see each other now. That you will go to college and get all your qualifications then you will both leave and get married without inviting them and make your own lives without them.

I am sure given the ultimatum they will re-consider their position
Wow, that has to be the worst advice ever! You actually suggest he threaten the family and that if they don't like it tough? That he run off and marry their daughter without inviting them? That he cut off and destroy the loving relationship between this girl and her parents? I am so shocked and disgusted, I don't know where to begin. Blessed are the peacemakers, eh faith?
Allow me to say a word of justice. Blaze is right here.[/quote]

Your both wrong and you reply shows you have not read the full thread and all my advice. That is the problem with people who come in deliberately to support someone in bias. You have done yourself an injustice by trying to support something you have no knowledge of how this advice came about.
Go and read all my posts and you will see this was an absolute last resort.
That I had already gone through the good possible ways of dealing with it.
Your very much like the girls Father who can only see his own opinion. Giving little relevance to the true fact. We do not own children and adult children can make their own decisions under the law of the land. Which the bible says we have to uphold.

Love Faith.xx :)

User avatar
Evales
Scholar
Posts: 307
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 7:10 am
Location: Australia

Post #47

Post by Evales »

Antagonist wrote:Explain to them how beliefs don't matter if you love eachother, explain that in the end you all believe the same things ( I assume that you're both in some kind of reformed, conformed or deformed protestant church: those only fight about a few phrases in the bible :-s ) and even if you don't, explain that you both are searching for the path to light in your life and that you have found yours and that she has found hers and that because they don't differ that much it shouldn't make a difference.
Italics added
I wouldn't use that wording. :D
Might cause friction

Post Reply