Is the God described in the Bible an unchanging God?

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
McCulloch
Site Supporter
Posts: 24063
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Toronto, ON, CA
Been thanked: 3 times

Is the God described in the Bible an unchanging God?

Post #1

Post by McCulloch »

Skyler wrote:I believe that the laws of nature are upheld by a supremely sovereign, unchanging God, and that is why they are uniform. That's why I have no problem with it.
Is the God described in the Bible an unchanging God?
Malachi 3:6 (New American Standard Bible) wrote:For I, the LORD, do not change; therefore you, O sons of Jacob, are not consumed.
Numbers 23:19 wrote:God is not a man, that He should lie,
Nor a son of man, that He should repent;
Has He said, and will He not do it?
Or has He spoken, and will He not make it good?
James 1:17 wrote:Every good thing given and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of lights, with whom there is no variation or shifting shadow.
Hebrews 13:8 wrote:Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever.
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John

User avatar
OnceConvinced
Savant
Posts: 8969
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:22 pm
Location: New Zealand
Has thanked: 50 times
Been thanked: 67 times
Contact:

Post #2

Post by OnceConvinced »

Well God has changed his methods in quite dramatic ways. From demanding blood sacrifices of animals to having one human sacrifice to cover them all. From demanding lots of silly little adherences to laws in the OT to wiping out a whole heap in the NT. From giving signs and wonders and talking face to face to people to... well nothing.

I heard one claim recently that because God is supposedly omniscient that all these changes were planned by him from the beginning of time, so therefore he has not actually changed his values or anything like that. He just enacted a plan that he had set from the beginning, knowing that at various points along the line he would need to change his methods. Not a bad argument, I felt, but then you first have to establish that God is indeed omniscient, which is impossible without showing him to be unloving, uncaring, unjust and cruel.

Society and its morals evolve and will continue to evolve. The bible however remains the same and just requires more and more apologetics and claims of "metaphors" and "symbolism" to justify it.

Prayer is like rubbing an old bottle and hoping that a genie will pop out and grant you three wishes.

There is much about this world that is mind boggling and impressive, but I see no need whatsoever to put it down to magical super powered beings.


Check out my website: Recker's World

User avatar
McCulloch
Site Supporter
Posts: 24063
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Toronto, ON, CA
Been thanked: 3 times

Post #3

Post by McCulloch »

OnceConvinced wrote:Not a bad argument, I felt, but then you first have to establish that God is indeed omniscient, which is impossible without showing him to be unloving, uncaring, unjust and cruel.
The God described in the Bible is omniscient. He knows the end from the beginning. He is also loving and just. It matters not that this is an impossible combination, this is theology not reality.
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Post #4

Post by Goat »

McCulloch wrote:
OnceConvinced wrote:Not a bad argument, I felt, but then you first have to establish that God is indeed omniscient, which is impossible without showing him to be unloving, uncaring, unjust and cruel.
The God described in the Bible is omniscient. He knows the end from the beginning. He is also loving and just. It matters not that this is an impossible combination, this is theology not reality.
They way that most Jews explain it is 'It is not God who changes, but rather our understanding of God.'
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

msmcneal
Scholar
Posts: 358
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 11:58 pm
Location: NW Tennessee

Post #5

Post by msmcneal »

If you look at both the OT and the NT, as OnceConvinced pointed out, there are actually huge differences and alot of changes. Now,
goat wrote:They way that most Jews explain it is 'It is not God who changes, but rather our understanding of God.'
and this works for Judaism, if we leave out the NT. Even in places in the Hebrew Bible where "God changed" such things as temple sacrifice, etc., it was due more to the circumstances. The Jews were captive in Babylon, away from the temple. So the change was more of necessity. The changes between the OT and NT were blatant. Of course, I believe that it was Paul who made those changes, and not Jesus. Paul seemed to be the instigator of all the problems found in Christianity. Jesus said that anyone who teaches another to not follow the Law, "it would be better for a millstone tied around his neck, and cast into the sea", and yet Paul says that the Law is done away with. Jesus kept to the Hebrew scriptures, to the best of his ability, and Paul trashed all of that. Paul made the changes.
Al-Baqarah 256 (Yusuf Ali translation) "Truth stands out clear from error"

spiritletter
Apprentice
Posts: 224
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 6:44 pm

Post #6

Post by spiritletter »

We have no way of knowing this. Maybe it's not a useful question.

Post Reply