Questions for debate:
- Is compliance with the Law impossible?
- Why is it impossible to believe that a human (other than Jesus himself) who could be
blameless as to the righteousness which is in the Law?
Moderator: Moderators
Well then how about an extra-Biblical answer? Everyone has their own individual capacity - meaning that for each law there will be as many different manifestations of it as there are individuals following it. It stands to reason that no one will live according to their capacity every moment of their life and so everyone must fall short of the law as expressed through their actions.McCulloch wrote:If someone were to claim that they had lived a life that honoured God by keeping the Law and that they had never broken that Law, in fact, that they were completely blameless with respect to the Law, how would a Christian respond?
I see nothing in the Bible which precludes such obedience.
But the Law does not have a measuring gauge of compliance. It is a finite discrete set of do this and don't do that. It does not stand to reason that everyone must fall short. Why do Christians teach that it is impossible to live according to the Law? Does the NT even teach such a thing?Vanguard wrote:It stands to reason that no one will live according to their capacity every moment of their life and so everyone must fall short of the law as expressed through their actions.
That's not correct. It is not all finite and discrete. When the Lord commands us to love thy neighbor how is that suppose to look?McCulloch wrote:But the Law does not have a measuring gauge of compliance. It is a finite discrete set of do this and don't do that. It does not stand to reason that everyone must fall short. Why do Christians teach that it is impossible to live according to the Law? Does the NT even teach such a thing?Vanguard wrote:It stands to reason that no one will live according to their capacity every moment of their life and so everyone must fall short of the law as expressed through their actions.
How is it that love could be a part of Law?Vanguard wrote:When the Lord commands us to love thy neighbor how is that suppose to look?
I should back up and ask your clarification of what you mean by the "law"?McCulloch wrote:How is it that love could be a part of Law?Vanguard wrote:When the Lord commands us to love thy neighbor how is that suppose to look?
Perhaps whatever the writers of the epistles meant by the Law. The set of rules laid down by God for the people.Vanguard wrote:I should back up and ask your clarification of what you mean by the "law"?
Do you consider the Lord's command to love thy neighbor to be part of this "law" that you refer to?McCulloch wrote:Perhaps whatever the writers of the epistles meant by the Law. The set of rules laid down by God for the people.Vanguard wrote:I should back up and ask your clarification of what you mean by the "law"?
Vanguard wrote:I should back up and ask your clarification of what you mean by the "law"?
McCulloch wrote:Perhaps whatever the writers of the epistles meant by the Law. The set of rules laid down by God for the people.
Jesus' own words to the contrary notwithstanding, no, I do not consider the command to love one's neighbors to be part of the law. Do you? Did the epistle writers?Vanguard wrote:Do you consider the Lord's command to love thy neighbor to be part of this "law" that you refer to?