Assuming Abe's GOD knew that Abe would sacrifice his son, why bother going through the motions of it all? What is the point therein?
(The assumption is based on the idea that the GOD can look into a persons heart and mind and know that person's intentions.)
If Abraham's GOD knew....
Moderator: Moderators
- William
- Savant
- Posts: 15238
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:11 pm
- Location: Te Waipounamu
- Has thanked: 974 times
- Been thanked: 1799 times
- Contact:
-
- Savant
- Posts: 12236
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 8:23 pm
- Location: New England
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 16 times
Re: If Abraham's GOD knew....
Post #2Excellent question. The tale seems to be told not so much as to illustrate the benevolence and omnicience of God, but rather to glorify Abaham, (and by extention the Jewish people) for his "great faith".William wrote: Assuming Abe's GOD knew that Abe would sacrifice his son, why bother going through the motions of it all? What is the point therein?
(The assumption is based on the idea that the GOD can look into a persons heart and mind and know that person's intentions.)
An atrocious and disgusting story, and it makes me wonder how many people it has inspired to slaughter their own children "for the good of their souls" or "for their own good" or because "God told them to do so" or "God was testing them".
Maybe just a handful, but even one would be waaaay too many.
My theological positions:
-God created us in His image, not the other way around.
-The Bible is redeemed by it's good parts.
-Pure monotheism, simple repentance.
-YHVH is LORD
-The real Jesus is not God, the real YHVH is not a monster.
-Eternal life is a gift from the Living God.
-Keep the Commandments, keep your salvation.
-I have accepted YHVH as my Heavenly Father, LORD and Savior.
I am inspired by Jesus to worship none but YHVH, and to serve only Him.
-God created us in His image, not the other way around.
-The Bible is redeemed by it's good parts.
-Pure monotheism, simple repentance.
-YHVH is LORD
-The real Jesus is not God, the real YHVH is not a monster.
-Eternal life is a gift from the Living God.
-Keep the Commandments, keep your salvation.
-I have accepted YHVH as my Heavenly Father, LORD and Savior.
I am inspired by Jesus to worship none but YHVH, and to serve only Him.
- bluethread
- Savant
- Posts: 9129
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:10 pm
Post #3
It was done for Avbraham's benefit and our own. It affirmed to Avraham that he held Adonai in at least as high regard as the deities of the nations and it also establishes that human sacrifice is not acceptable for Adonai's people.
- JehovahsWitness
- Savant
- Posts: 22822
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
- Has thanked: 892 times
- Been thanked: 1331 times
- Contact:
Re: If Abraham's GOD knew....
Post #4William wrote: Assuming Abe's GOD knew that Abe would sacrifice his son, why bother going through the motions of it all? What is the point therein?
Assuming the text didn't declare the above though, I believe that the point was that Abraham was participating in a "Prophetic Drama" that illustrated the sacrifice Jehovah (and his beloved son Jesus) would be willing to make on behalf of mankind. In short to drive home what an incredibly huge sacrifice was going to be made and hw painful that would be for God, which in turn should imprint on the hearts and minds of those that can be touched, how much both JEHOVAH and Jesus love humans and how far they were both willing to go so that humans have the opportunity to live forever. The price couldn't have been higher, the love couldn't have been more.NOTE: The above assumption is in direct contradiction of the text which states that only after Abraham had demonstrated his willingness to go through with the test did God declared "NOW I do know...", the implication being he didn't know before.

RELATED POSTS
Why was it necessary to save mankind?
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 190#852190
FURTHER READING What went wrong?
https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/2017286#h=17
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
- William
- Savant
- Posts: 15238
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:11 pm
- Location: Te Waipounamu
- Has thanked: 974 times
- Been thanked: 1799 times
- Contact:
Interesting mix of answers...
Post #5Those are some interesting answers...
[Replying to post 2 by Elijah John]
I am struggling with the notion that humans beings actually do have the knowledge of good and evil and can discern altogether what 'atrocious and disgusting' actually is.
It appears to be very much a matter of opinion rather than something which can be pointed to as an actual absolute - scientifically verifiable.
[Replying to post 3 by bluethread]
Only - in what apparent way is Adonai actually any more a better example than 'the deities of the nations' apart from being an actual GOD?
This is what many struggle with comprehending. How is a false [strike]GOD[/strike] god demanding human sacrifice any better than a real GOD demanding human sacrifice?
Perhaps they were not sacrificing these for Adonia but simple culling them from their midst?
But wouldn't that really amount to the same thing?
[Replying to post 4 by JehovahsWitness]
Jehovah understood that aspect of the human psyche to which offering the best and most beloved was an outpouring of an expression humans understood as being LOVE.
Motivated by fear, the sacrifice is unacceptable.
Jehovah was more than willing to accommodate those humans who understood LOVE in this way and could therefore respond to it.
[Replying to post 2 by Elijah John]
I have been mulling on it for a few months now...Excellent question.
The tale seems to be told not so much as to illustrate the benevolence and omnicience of God, but rather to glorify Abaham, (and by extention the Jewish people) for his "great faith".
This implies that the God would be able to forgive those who - having the same intent as He - did such deeds some deem to be 'atrocious and disgusting'... The intent is the thing under question...This appears to be a similar understanding that BT and JW are expressing...only of course... in the positive.
An atrocious and disgusting story, and it makes me wonder how many people it has inspired to slaughter their own children "for the good of their souls" or "for their own good" or because "God told them to do so" or "God was testing them".
Maybe just a handful, but even one would be waaaay too many.
I am struggling with the notion that humans beings actually do have the knowledge of good and evil and can discern altogether what 'atrocious and disgusting' actually is.
It appears to be very much a matter of opinion rather than something which can be pointed to as an actual absolute - scientifically verifiable.
[Replying to post 3 by bluethread]
It was done for Avbraham's benefit and our own. It affirmed to Avraham that he held Adonai in at least as high regard as the deities of the nations...
Only - in what apparent way is Adonai actually any more a better example than 'the deities of the nations' apart from being an actual GOD?
This is what many struggle with comprehending. How is a false [strike]GOD[/strike] god demanding human sacrifice any better than a real GOD demanding human sacrifice?
I struggle with this in terms of such stories hundreds of years after Avbrahamm, in Yeshuas time, people of Avbraham were willing to sacrifice the adulterous in their midst with the belief they had the nod of approval from Adonai....and it also establishes that human sacrifice is not acceptable for Adonai's people.
Perhaps they were not sacrificing these for Adonia but simple culling them from their midst?
But wouldn't that really amount to the same thing?
[Replying to post 4 by JehovahsWitness]
I think that argument can be placed to one side for now. It brings the confusion of Jehovah being willing to turn off his abilities when it suited, which implies he was in some way testing himself as well as Abraham. Not that this isn't an interesting concept in itself...NOTE: The above assumption is in direct contradiction of the text which states that only after Abraham had demonstrated his willingness to go through with the test did God declared "NOW I do know...", the implication being he didn't know before.
This may deeply be implying that Jehovah understood that false gods and human sacrifice were the result of the human predicament and that in the understanding Jehovah could see the love and fear and other aspects of the human condition as being part of the overall recipe in that 'soup' which was being externalized into the world through human expression.Assuming the text didn't declare the above though, I believe that the point was that Abraham was participating in a "Prophetic Drama" that illustrated the sacrifice Jehovah (and his beloved son Jesus) would be willing to make on behalf of mankind. In short to drive home what an incredibly huge sacrifice was going to be made and hw painful that would be for God, which in turn should imprint on the hearts and minds of those that can be touched, how much both JEHOVAH and Jesus love humans and how far they were both willing to go so that humans have the opportunity to live forever. The price couldn't have been higher, the love couldn't have been more.
Jehovah understood that aspect of the human psyche to which offering the best and most beloved was an outpouring of an expression humans understood as being LOVE.
Motivated by fear, the sacrifice is unacceptable.
Jehovah was more than willing to accommodate those humans who understood LOVE in this way and could therefore respond to it.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1871
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 12:07 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Interesting mix of answers...
Post #6William wrote: Those are some interesting answers...
[Replying to post 2 by Elijah John]
I have been mulling on it for a few months now...Excellent question.
The tale seems to be told not so much as to illustrate the benevolence and omnicience of God, but rather to glorify Abaham, (and by extention the Jewish people) for his "great faith".This implies that the God would be able to forgive those who - having the same intent as He - did such deeds some deem to be 'atrocious and disgusting'... The intent is the thing under question...This appears to be a similar understanding that BT and JW are expressing...only of course... in the positive.
An atrocious and disgusting story, and it makes me wonder how many people it has inspired to slaughter their own children "for the good of their souls" or "for their own good" or because "God told them to do so" or "God was testing them".
Maybe just a handful, but even one would be waaaay too many.
I am struggling with the notion that humans beings actually do have the knowledge of good and evil and can discern altogether what 'atrocious and disgusting' actually is.
It appears to be very much a matter of opinion rather than something which can be pointed to as an actual absolute - scientifically verifiable.
[Replying to post 3 by bluethread]
It was done for Avbraham's benefit and our own. It affirmed to Avraham that he held Adonai in at least as high regard as the deities of the nations...
Only - in what apparent way is Adonai actually any more a better example than 'the deities of the nations' apart from being an actual GOD?
This is what many struggle with comprehending. How is a false [strike]GOD[/strike] god demanding human sacrifice any better than a real GOD demanding human sacrifice?
[strike]I struggle with this in terms of such stories hundreds of years after Avbrahamm, in Yeshuas time, people of Avbraham were willing to sacrifice the adulterous in their midst with the belief they had the nod of approval from Adonai....and it also establishes that human sacrifice is not acceptable for Adonai's people.
Perhaps they were not sacrificing these for Adonia but simple culling them from their midst?[/strike]
But wouldn't that really amount to the same thing?
[Replying to post 4 by JehovahsWitness]
.
The highlighted area is what I respond to. This stoning and banishing was as Moses taught them just before he passed. He admonished them to do this to keep evil out of their midst.
I admit I don't know how to use the forum tools correctly yet.

-
- Savant
- Posts: 12236
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 8:23 pm
- Location: New England
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 16 times
Post #7
I agree that was the end result. To teach that human sacrifice is wrong. But couldn't the same have been achieved without attributing the original impuse to human sacrifice to God's "testing" instead of Abraham's own idea as to how to please God?bluethread wrote: It was done for Avbraham's benefit and our own. It affirmed to Avraham that he held Adonai in at least as high regard as the deities of the nations and it also establishes that human sacrifice is not acceptable for Adonai's people.
And God's role was only in the prevention and in the correction?
Such as:
"One day, Abraham had this awful thought that God wanted him to put his beloved son Isaac to the blade in order to please YHVH, just as his forebears had done in order to please their gods. After much turmoil Abraham decided to do what he believed God wanted him to do, and slaughter his son as an offering...(long story short), God corrected him by staying his hand just as Abraham was about to strike and told him "NO, this is not the way to please me..."
Do you think God actually "put Abraham to the test"? OR is it possible (or likely) that the Hebrew storytellers told the tale the way we have it in Genesis so as to glorify Abraham, (and by extention the Hebrew people) for his "great faith"?
I'll ask you two more questions that I have asked others.
1) Is human blood sacrifice sin?
2) Does God ever tempt anyone to sin?
And here's another. Would God ever command something of His people that He condemns the Nations for having practiced?
My theological positions:
-God created us in His image, not the other way around.
-The Bible is redeemed by it's good parts.
-Pure monotheism, simple repentance.
-YHVH is LORD
-The real Jesus is not God, the real YHVH is not a monster.
-Eternal life is a gift from the Living God.
-Keep the Commandments, keep your salvation.
-I have accepted YHVH as my Heavenly Father, LORD and Savior.
I am inspired by Jesus to worship none but YHVH, and to serve only Him.
-God created us in His image, not the other way around.
-The Bible is redeemed by it's good parts.
-Pure monotheism, simple repentance.
-YHVH is LORD
-The real Jesus is not God, the real YHVH is not a monster.
-Eternal life is a gift from the Living God.
-Keep the Commandments, keep your salvation.
-I have accepted YHVH as my Heavenly Father, LORD and Savior.
I am inspired by Jesus to worship none but YHVH, and to serve only Him.
- bluethread
- Savant
- Posts: 9129
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:10 pm
Re: Interesting mix of answers...
Post #8The story shows that Adonai does not want human sacrifice. That is the difference. He stops it from happening. Having Avraham go through the motions is an object lesson for both Avraham and us.William wrote:
[Replying to post 3 by bluethread]
It was done for Avbraham's benefit and our own. It affirmed to Avraham that he held Adonai in at least as high regard as the deities of the nations...
Only - in what apparent way is Adonai actually any more a better example than 'the deities of the nations' apart from being an actual GOD?
This is what many struggle with comprehending. How is a false [strike]GOD[/strike] god demanding human sacrifice any better than a real GOD demanding human sacrifice?
I struggle with this in terms of such stories hundreds of years after Avbrahamm, in Yeshuas time, people of Avbraham were willing to sacrifice the adulterous in their midst with the belief they had the nod of approval from Adonai....and it also establishes that human sacrifice is not acceptable for Adonai's people.
Perhaps they were not sacrificing these for Adonia but simple culling them from their midst?
But wouldn't that really amount to the same thing?
No, that would not have been a sacrifice. That would have been a legal judgement, had they done it legally. There are number of violations of HaTorah that were being committed in that incident and Yeshua pointed that out.
- William
- Savant
- Posts: 15238
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:11 pm
- Location: Te Waipounamu
- Has thanked: 974 times
- Been thanked: 1799 times
- Contact:
Re: Interesting mix of answers...
Post #9[Replying to post 8 by bluethread]
Is it not regarded as sacrifice because it is not done in accordance with the GODs instructions?
Or is it not regarded a sacrifice because the victims are not pure or innocent or the best of the crop?
As to what Yeshua was pointing out, he simply said that whoever is pure and innocent can throw the first stone. Is it then that each person is only allowed to throw one stone? Is it that the legalities Yeshua was pointing out had to do with people understanding the they had no right to judge others when they themselves were guilty?
Was it simply exampling the idea that it is the guilty themselves who go around making proclamations of guilt in others and crying out for their blood - nah, their very lives?
What exactly are these legalities that you say Yeshua was pointing out?
Does Adonai prefer to remain separate from the state?
Yes but what makes it legal? Is it Adonai?No, that would not have been a sacrifice. That would have been a legal judgement, had they done it legally. There are number of violations of HaTorah that were being committed in that incident and Yeshua pointed that out.
Is it not regarded as sacrifice because it is not done in accordance with the GODs instructions?
Or is it not regarded a sacrifice because the victims are not pure or innocent or the best of the crop?
As to what Yeshua was pointing out, he simply said that whoever is pure and innocent can throw the first stone. Is it then that each person is only allowed to throw one stone? Is it that the legalities Yeshua was pointing out had to do with people understanding the they had no right to judge others when they themselves were guilty?
Was it simply exampling the idea that it is the guilty themselves who go around making proclamations of guilt in others and crying out for their blood - nah, their very lives?
What exactly are these legalities that you say Yeshua was pointing out?
Does Adonai prefer to remain separate from the state?
Post #10
The OT passage itself focuses on Abraham's priority loyalty to YHWH. Jesus' words in Matt 10.37: ""Anyone who loves his father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; anyone who loves his son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me".
A great analysis of the entire story:
http://christianthinktank.com/qkilisak.html
A great analysis of the entire story:
http://christianthinktank.com/qkilisak.html