Abiogenesis, Hypothesis and Evidence of:

[Neatras]

[Neatras]

NEW addition to subsection Genetic "code" and formation:

• Experiment shows new biological functions commonly arise within random sequences. 4

Expanded info:

• 4 Random sequences are an abundant source of bioactive RNAs or peptides

[marke]

[The Barbarian]

The bare facts, data, and evidence do not suggest abiogenesis was the cause of the formation of original life on earth, but evolutionists wrongly claim their interpretations and assumptions about the data is proof that abiogenseis is a scientific fact.

As we get more and more information about the way life began on the early earth, scientists are increasingly agreeing that (as God already tells us) life was brought forth by the Earth. It's nice to see that the evidence agrees with Him, but how could it not?

BTW, it's not part of evolutionary theory. Even Darwin suggested that God might have just created the first living things.

[marke]

The bare facts, data, and evidence do not suggest abiogenesis was the cause of the formation of original life on earth, but evolutionists wrongly claim their interpretations and assumptions about the data is proof that abiogenseis is a scientific fact.

As we get more and more information about the way life began on the early earth, scientists are increasingly agreeing that (as God already tells us) life was brought forth by the Earth. It's nice to see that the evidence agrees with Him, but how could it not?

BTW, it's not part of evolutionary theory. Even Darwin suggested that God might have just created the first living things.

Marke: Miller and Urey proved that the earth could not have created life apart from His creation of all things during the week of creation.