On the word "Antisemitism"

Two hot topics for the price of one

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
cnorman18

On the word "Antisemitism"

Post #1

Post by cnorman18 »

Attempts have recently been made on this forum -- specifically, here, here, and in other places -- to redefine the word antisemitism. The member who has been doing this is quite fond of going to the dictionary for definitions and to Wikipedia for commentary and support for his arguments -- but not for this word:
Merriam-Webster wrote:
Definition of ANTI-SEMITISM : hostility toward or discrimination against Jews as a religious, ethnic, or racial group

That should settle the matter; but in the interest of a fuller discussion, here are some excerpts from the Wikipedia article with my own emphasis added.

I recommend reading the entire article highly; the photograph at the head of the entry is particularly illuminating, and may indeed seem familiar -- as might some of the themes I have highlighted below:
Wikipedia wrote:
Antisemitism (also spelled anti-semitism or anti-Semitism) is prejudice against or hostility towards Jews often rooted in hatred of their ethnic background, culture, and/or religion. In its extreme form, it "attributes to the Jews an exceptional position among all other civilizations, defames them as an inferior group and denies their being part of the nation[s]" in which they reside. A person who holds such views is called an "antisemite"....

While the term's etymology might suggest that antisemitism is directed against all Semitic peoples, the term was coined in the late 19th century in Germany as a more scientific-sounding term for Judenhass ("Jew-hatred"), and that has been its normal use since then.

....from the 1990s, some writers claim to have identified a new antisemitism, a form of antisemitism coming simultaneously from the far left, the far right, and radical Islam, which tends to focus on opposition to Zionism and a Jewish homeland in the State of Israel, and which may deploy traditional antisemitism motifs, including older motifs....

Holocaust denial and Jewish conspiracy theories are also considered a form of antisemitism.

....Despite the use of the prefix anti-, the terms Semitic and anti-Semitic are not directly opposed to each other. Antisemitism refers specifically to prejudice against Jews alone and in general, despite the fact that there are other speakers of Semitic languages (e.g. Arabs, Ethiopians, or Assyrians) and that not all Jews speak a Semitic language. The term anti-Semitic has been used on occasion to include bigotry against other Semitic-language peoples such as Arabs, but such usage is not widely accepted.

Though the general definition of antisemitism is hostility or prejudice against Jews, a number of authorities have developed more formal definitions.... Holocaust scholar and City University of New York professor Helen Fein defines it as "a persisting latent structure of hostile beliefs towards Jews as a collective manifested in individuals as attitudes, and in culture as myth, ideology, folklore and imagery, and in actions – social or legal discrimination, political mobilization against the Jews, and collective or state violence – which results in and/or is designed to distance, displace, or destroy Jews as Jews." Elaborating on Fein's definition, Dietz Bering of the University of Cologne writes that, to antisemites, "Jews are not only partially but totally bad by nature, that is, their bad traits are incorrigible. Because of this bad nature: (1) Jews have to be seen not as individuals but as a collective. (2) Jews remain essentially alien in the surrounding societies. (3) Jews bring disaster on their 'host societies' or on the whole world, they are doing it secretly, therefore the antisemites feel obliged to unmask the conspiratorial, bad Jewish character." Bernard Lewis defines antisemitism as a special case of prejudice, hatred, or persecution directed against people who are in some way different from the rest. According to Lewis, antisemitism is marked by two distinct features: Jews are judged according to a standard different from that applied to others, and they are accused of "cosmic evil." Thus, "it is perfectly possible to hate and even to persecute Jews without necessarily being anti-Semitic" unless this hatred or persecution displays one of the two features specific to antisemitism.

There have been a number of efforts by international and governmental bodies to define antisemitism formally.... In 2005, the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (now Fundamental Rights Agency), then an agency of the European Union, developed a more detailed definition: "Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities. In addition, such manifestations could also target the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for 'why things go wrong'."

It then listed "contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere." These included: "Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews; accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group; denying the Holocaust; and accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.

It also listed ways in which attacking Israel could be antisemitic:

• Denying the Jewish people the right to self-determination, e.g. by claiming that the existence of a state of Israel is a racist endeavor;

• Applying double standards by requiring of Israel a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation;


• Using the symbols and images associated with classic anti-Semitism (e.g. claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis;

• Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis;

• Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the State of Israel.

The definition added that criticism of Israel cannot be regarded as antisemitism so long as it is "similar to that leveled against any other country."

There is much more: the section on antisemitism in the Middle East is especially interesting and probative.

"Semitic" does indeed refer to peoples other than Jews; but there is no such thing as "Semitism," and claiming that "antisemitism" means anything other than hatred of Jews is akin to claiming that "anti-Americanism" could refer to antipathy toward Canada, Mexico and Brazil. In other words, it's ludicrous.

I DO hope that this puts this bit of misdirection and obfuscation of the obvious meaning of this term to rest. I'll decline to speculate on why anyone would make such a hobbyhorse of it, repeatedly trying to devalue or dismiss antisemitism, that is, the hatred of and prejudice against Jews, as a concept that is somehow illegitimate or not worthy of attention. Since no sane person, surely, would claim that no such thing as antisemitism exists, one wonders why there would or could be any objection to the word, the meaning of which has been perfectly clear and commonly and unambiguously understood for well over a hundred years. Should there be no word for antisemitism? Does antisemitism not exist? Is antisemitism somehow irrelevant to the debate about a part of the world where it is actively promoted and encouraged by governments and religious institutions? As I say, one wonders what the point of these posts might have been, and the motivation behind them -- but, as I say, I shall not speculate.

User avatar
McCulloch
Site Supporter
Posts: 24063
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Toronto, ON, CA
Been thanked: 3 times

Post #2

Post by McCulloch »

Just a note on the inconsistencies of language. As you correctly show, antisemitism is not the same thing as being against all Semites. Perhaps antisemitism was not the best choice as a word describing hatred of the Jews, but it is the word we are now stuck with. The middle East and the mid-west are not next to each other either. The American South is north of Central America. Language can be funny that way.
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John

DeBunkem
Banned
Banned
Posts: 568
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:57 pm

Post #3

Post by DeBunkem »

BTW, "anti-Christian" applies only to Catholics.

BTW, Abraham was an Arab from Iraq...he apparently was not Semite. :-k

cnorman18

Post #4

Post by cnorman18 »

DeBunkem wrote:BTW, "anti-Christian" applies only to Catholics.

BTW, Abraham was an Arab from Iraq...he apparently was not Semite. :-k
...both of which remarks totally ignore and fail to address the arguments in the OP.

Imagine my surprise...

Shermana
Prodigy
Posts: 3762
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 10:19 pm
Location: City of the "Angels"
Been thanked: 5 times

Post #5

Post by Shermana »

I suggest a new word altogether along the lines of Judahpathy or Judaphobia.

"Anti-semitism" is too "used and abused" to function as what it's supposed to mean.

Historically, it was coined specifically for Jews, only recently has it taken on its actual literal application meaning all of Shem.

And Abraham was from the Sons of Aram.

cnorman18

Post #6

Post by cnorman18 »

Shermana wrote:I suggest a new word altogether along the lines of Judahpathy or Judaphobia.

"Anti-semitism" is too "used and abused" to function as what it's supposed to mean.

Historically, it was coined specifically for Jews, only recently has it taken on its actual literal application meaning all of Shem.

And Abraham was from the Sons of Aram.
I disagree. "Antisemitism" is a perfectly good word with a perfectly clear meaning that has been in use for more than a century. It is rare to see it used to mean anything other than "Jew-hatred" -- if you need an alternate term, there's one -- except by those whose intent seems to be more to devalue the concept, since there seems to be little other point in devaluing the word. The idea seems to be that "the charge of antisemitism is always false, since there is no such thing." I have never seen the term disputed with any other reasoning behind it, or at least none has ever been presented. Ever seen any of those who make these claims admit that Jew-hatred IS a problem, EVER? .

User avatar
Choir Loft
Banned
Banned
Posts: 547
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:57 am
Location: Tampa

Re: On the word "Antisemitism"

Post #7

Post by Choir Loft »

cnorman18 wrote: I DO hope that this puts this bit of misdirection and obfuscation of the obvious meaning of this term to rest. I'll decline to speculate on why anyone would make such a hobbyhorse of it, repeatedly trying to devalue or dismiss antisemitism, that is, the hatred of and prejudice against Jews, as a concept that is somehow illegitimate or not worthy of attention. .
First you kill the word (anti-semitism), then you kill the jew.

Before one can instigate a campaign of hatred and terror against an innocent group of people, one has to do two things.

First - one must negate or reduce to nothing those words and definitions that support the dignity and right of a group to exist in human society as equals. The biggest word that supports the right of some people to wear Jewish skin is anti-semitism. It's a big word because it points to attitudes and practices that denude an entire group of their right to live.

Second - having removed barriers to respect and dignity, a vigorous campaign of misinformation must be started and maintained. It matters not whether any charge brought against an innocent group or person is true or false.

If the elimination of restraint against bigotry is successful and the associated smear campaign is accepted, then it will not be long before a second crystal night is recorded in the annals of history.

Mankind is monsterous at heart. Given the right circumstances there is no horror it will not perform. That's why we have laws and religion. It's not a perfect restraint, but it's better than nothing.

Shermana
Prodigy
Posts: 3762
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 10:19 pm
Location: City of the "Angels"
Been thanked: 5 times

Post #8

Post by Shermana »

I don't suggest killing the word but making it more modern and to the point.

That's why I suggest Judahpathy.

User avatar
Choir Loft
Banned
Banned
Posts: 547
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:57 am
Location: Tampa

Post #9

Post by Choir Loft »

Shermana wrote:I don't suggest killing the word but making it more modern and to the point.

That's why I suggest Judahpathy.
Blood is thicker than water and politically correct adaptations seek to take the sting out of the truth.

Use your modern word if you wish, but no one will know what you're talking about until you explain it. You know what they say about things that have to be explained, that they lose their meaning in translation.

Everybody knows what anti-semitism means. It is bigotry pure and simple.

Do you have a polite word for bigotry too?

Post Reply