Argentina Approves Gay Marriage

Two hot topics for the price of one

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Ooberman
Banned
Banned
Posts: 4262
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 6:02 pm
Location: Philadelphia

Argentina Approves Gay Marriage

Post #1

Post by Ooberman »

Argentina Approves Gay Marriage
By ALEXEI BARRIONUEVO
Published: July 15, 2010

BUENOS AIRES — Argentina’s Senate narrowly approved a measure early on Thursday authorizing same-sex marriages, making Argentina the first country in Latin America to allow gay couples to wed.

After 15 hours of debate, the Senate voted 33 to 27 in favor of the measure, which was sponsored by the government of President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner. For weeks, she waged a bitter war of words with the Roman Catholic Church over the measure.



What great news. And in a Roman Catholic country, and continent that has had severe issues with homophobia.

I will be surprised if it takes America more than 10 years to legalize gay marriage.

User avatar
micatala
Site Supporter
Posts: 8338
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 2:04 pm

Re: Argentina Approves Gay Marriage

Post #2

Post by micatala »

Ooberman wrote:Argentina Approves Gay Marriage
By ALEXEI BARRIONUEVO
Published: July 15, 2010

BUENOS AIRES — Argentina’s Senate narrowly approved a measure early on Thursday authorizing same-sex marriages, making Argentina the first country in Latin America to allow gay couples to wed.

After 15 hours of debate, the Senate voted 33 to 27 in favor of the measure, which was sponsored by the government of President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner. For weeks, she waged a bitter war of words with the Roman Catholic Church over the measure.



What great news. And in a Roman Catholic country, and continent that has had severe issues with homophobia.

I will be surprised if it takes America more than 10 years to legalize gay marriage.
You may be right. The California Proposition 8 case being led by Olson and Boies could be the mechanism for this.



Just as a note, is there a question for debate here?
" . . . the line separating good and evil passes, not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties either, but right through every human heart . . . ." Alexander Solzhenitsyn

User avatar
Ooberman
Banned
Banned
Posts: 4262
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 6:02 pm
Location: Philadelphia

Post #3

Post by Ooberman »

I guess the debate could be: will Argentina see divorce as the norm, populations decrease, society plunges into chaos, drug use increases, etc?

User avatar
Jrosemary
Sage
Posts: 627
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 6:50 pm
Location: New Jersey
Contact:

Post #4

Post by Jrosemary »

Good for Argentina! I would have put my money on Uruguay as the first South American country to approve gay marriage--they already have civil unions and gay partners can legally adopt children. Here's hoping they're next. O:)

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Post #5

Post by Goat »

Jrosemary wrote:Good for Argentina! I would have put my money on Uruguay as the first South American country to approve gay marriage--they already have civil unions and gay partners can legally adopt children. Here's hoping they're next. O:)
Right now, I would perfer to see some more states in the U.S. do that.
Right now, NYS will acknowledge marriages done in other states, but doesn't perform marriages here.. I would like to see that changed to be more consistent.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

User avatar
Jrosemary
Sage
Posts: 627
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 6:50 pm
Location: New Jersey
Contact:

Post #6

Post by Jrosemary »

Goat wrote:
Jrosemary wrote:Good for Argentina! I would have put my money on Uruguay as the first South American country to approve gay marriage--they already have civil unions and gay partners can legally adopt children. Here's hoping they're next. O:)
Right now, I would perfer to see some more states in the U.S. do that.
Right now, NYS will acknowledge marriages done in other states, but doesn't perform marriages here.. I would like to see that changed to be more consistent.
My bad--I meant hopefully Uruguay will be next in South America. Yes, overall I'd like to see gay marriage legalized in this country next.

But I'm hoping Uruguay will come soon, because I have a sentimental attachment to that country. It's based on the facts that I love a rock group from there called El Cuarteto de Nos and I love their World Cup soccer team. 8-)

User avatar
East of Eden
Under Suspension
Posts: 7032
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Post #7

Post by East of Eden »

I'm sorry to hear about this.
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE

TheLibertarian
Under Probation
Posts: 186
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:39 am

Post #8

Post by TheLibertarian »

Strike a blow for freedom!

TheLibertarian
Under Probation
Posts: 186
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:39 am

Post #9

Post by TheLibertarian »

East of Eden wrote:I'm sorry to hear about this.
You poor, pathetic socialist-of-the-spirit. It must really hurt to know that the government no longer has the power to define men's lives for them.

User avatar
East of Eden
Under Suspension
Posts: 7032
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Post #10

Post by East of Eden »

TheLibertarian wrote:
East of Eden wrote:I'm sorry to hear about this.
You poor, pathetic socialist-of-the-spirit. It must really hurt to know that the government no longer has the power to define men's lives for them.
You might want to check forum rules 1, 7, and 16. Insults and namecalling don't constitute debate. Unfortunately your side often resorts to that.
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE

Post Reply