The Logic of Satan's Temptation to Eve
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Apprentice
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:09 pm
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
Re: The Logic of Satan's Temptation to Eve
Post #22[Replying to Skeptical in post #21]
For most Christians and Muslims, discussing religion is always proselytizing. The more people who believe the nonsense the easier they find it to believe.
For most Christians and Muslims, discussing religion is always proselytizing. The more people who believe the nonsense the easier they find it to believe.
-
- Apprentice
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2023 5:55 pm
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
Re: The Logic of Satan's Temptation to Eve
Post #25Well, yes. According to God's straightforward test of Adam and Eve. However, when the serpent said differently from what God told them, why didn't Adam and Eve's perfect adult brains reason: Now why would God's test include a tree that was in our reach that he didn't want us to get to because it would give us magical or godly abilities? Because that would be like if someone has something that they really didn't want someone else to have, however, at the same time, they would leave it right out in the open where that someone else could take it from them or have some of it for themselves.JehovahsWitness wrote: ↑Tue May 23, 2023 10:07 am Okay I think I see the ...deviation now. I dealt with the question ...
JehovahsWitness wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 7:11 pm WHY DIDN'T GOD JUST PUT THE TREE SOMEWHERE THAT ADAM AND EVE COULD NOT REACH IT? ...
But what you really wanted to know is ...
I looked at ..."Why didn't God put the tree out of reach ?" .... But you wanted to know "Why did he put the tree within reach?" ie not out of reach.
I see now your accusation of deviation was entirely reasonsble.
Fortunately the answer to your entirely different question is entirely the same...because it was a TEST.
Also, according to Bible chronology, we're all supposed to be 6000 plus years removed from Adam and Eve. But why is it that I am able to figure something like that out, but they couldn't?
- JehovahsWitness
- Savant
- Posts: 22893
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
- Has thanked: 900 times
- Been thanked: 1339 times
- Contact:
Re: The Logic of Satan's Temptation to Eve
Post #26Exactly! You are correct, it was indeed a straight forward test that they both evidently understood: do not eat from the tree. Their deliberate violation if that simple command was a direct act of rebellion.

RELATED POSTS
Did God know Adam and Eve would sin?
viewtopic.php?p=1121777#p1121777
Were Adam and Eve being tested?
viewtopic.php?p=1092256#p1092256
How could a perfect individual sin?
viewtopic.php?p=1121742#p1121742
To learn more please go to other posts related to ....
OMNISCIENCE , FREE WILL and ... THE TREE OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF GOOD AND BAD
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
- otseng
- Savant
- Posts: 20867
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
- Has thanked: 214 times
- Been thanked: 368 times
- Contact:
Re: The Logic of Satan's Temptation to Eve
Post #27Moderator CommentGracchus wrote: ↑Wed May 24, 2023 1:04 am [Replying to Skeptical in post #21]
For most Christians and Muslims, discussing religion is always proselytizing. The more people who believe the nonsense the easier they find it to believe.
Please debate without commenting about others.
Please review the Rules.
______________
Moderator comments do not count as a strike against any posters. They only serve as an acknowledgment that a post report has been received, but has not been judged to warrant a moderator warning against a particular poster. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.
- JehovahsWitness
- Savant
- Posts: 22893
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
- Has thanked: 900 times
- Been thanked: 1339 times
- Contact:
Re: The Logic of Satan's Temptation to Eve
Post #28Not at all, Jehovah's Witnesses believe the bible including the book of Genesis has many expressions that should not be taken literally,. For example the creative "days" in Genesis chapters 1 and two, should not be taken to be literal 24 hour days and the "evening " and "morning" refered to not literal moments of sunset but periods that mark the end of each period.
So while we hold that the events in Genesis were all historical realities, some of the expressions should be taken contextually to be poetic or non-literal.
RELATED POSTS
Are Jehovah's Witnesses "biblical listeralists"?
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 28#p868428
How can you determine which parts of the bible are to be taken fictional?
viewtopic.php?p=1076525#p1076525
How does one determine what is or is not literal?
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 95#p890395
* bible interpretationTo learn more please go to other posts related to...
THE BIBLE , HERMENEUTICS* and ... BIBLICAL LITERALISM
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
- 1213
- Savant
- Posts: 12784
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:06 am
- Location: Finland
- Has thanked: 448 times
- Been thanked: 468 times
Re: The Logic of Satan's Temptation to Eve
Post #30My new book can be read freely from here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rIkqxC ... xtqFY/view
Old version can be read from here:
http://web.archive.org/web/202212010403 ... x_eng.html
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rIkqxC ... xtqFY/view
Old version can be read from here:
http://web.archive.org/web/202212010403 ... x_eng.html