Stem Cell Research

Kuan · Post by **Kuan** » Fri Jul 23, 2010 11:55 pm

Should stem cells be allowed for medical reasons? If yes, should they allow all types or should they limit the uses?

A primer on stem cells

Goat · Post by **Goat** » Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:26 pm

mormon boy51 wrote:
AkiThePirate wrote:Society isn't losing responsibility, it's just becoming more secular.
How does that relate to a loss of responsiblity?

He is saying there isn't a lost of responsibility.. that some religious conservatives assume that because there is a shift away from their viewpoint.

Kuan · Post by **Kuan** » Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:35 pm

Goat wrote:
mormon boy51 wrote:
AkiThePirate wrote:Society isn't losing responsibility, it's just becoming more secular.
How does that relate to a loss of responsiblity?
He is saying there isn't a lost of responsibility.. that some religious conservatives assume that because there is a shift away from their viewpoint.

That is true, but my reason to believe there is a loss of responsibility is because of abortion.

Goat · Post by **Goat** » Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:44 pm

mormon boy51 wrote:
Goat wrote:
mormon boy51 wrote:
AkiThePirate wrote:Society isn't losing responsibility, it's just becoming more secular.
How does that relate to a loss of responsiblity?
He is saying there isn't a lost of responsibility.. that some religious conservatives assume that because there is a shift away from their viewpoint.
That is true, but my reason to believe there is a loss of responsibility is because of abortion.

I don't consider having an abortion as much of a loss of responsiblity as much as bringing an unwanted child, or a child you can't afford to raise into the world.

Kuan · Post by **Kuan** » Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:49 pm

Goat wrote:
mormon boy51 wrote:
Goat wrote:
mormon boy51 wrote:
AkiThePirate wrote:Society isn't losing responsibility, it's just becoming more secular.
How does that relate to a loss of responsiblity?
He is saying there isn't a lost of responsibility.. that some religious conservatives assume that because there is a shift away from their viewpoint.
That is true, but my reason to believe there is a loss of responsibility is because of abortion.
I don't consider having an abortion as much of a loss of responsiblity as much as bringing an unwanted child, or a child you can't afford to raise into the world.

I see it as being a loss of responsibility. If you cannot fulfill the requirements of a parent you were not responsible.

LiamOS · Post by **LiamOS** » Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:13 pm

To a religious person, it might seem to be a loss of responsibility.

Kuan · Post by **Kuan** » Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:14 pm

Agreed, back OT

DeBunkem · Post by **DeBunkem** » Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:17 am

WinePusher wrote:
mormon boy51 wrote:Yes and that all makes. Still, how far do we want to take our knowledge of medicine? Wouldn't it be unethical to keep natural selection from taking its course? The same proccess that gave us this knowledge? Is it possible that from our knowledge of medicine and preventing natural selection because of it that we are causing overpopulation on earth? Couldn't this add even more on our already stressed planet?

Goat wrote:Not if we also teach this little thing known as 'RESPONSIBLITIY and BIRTH CONTROL.

The very things that the people who are against stem cell research and abortion are against.
No no no. They're aganist giving public schools the authority to teach sexual procedure or conduct, as that is NOT the job of government run public schools, but rather the job of the Parents, not the school.

Human sexuality is inseparable from anthropology. It is not the job of the immoral private-run corporate media (sexuality as commodity) to teach sexual conduct as is the case for millions of latchkey kids of overworked wage-slave parents.