Is there such a thing as Liberal Fundamentalism?

Two hot topics for the price of one

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
McCulloch
Site Supporter
Posts: 24063
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Toronto, ON, CA
Been thanked: 3 times

Is there such a thing as Liberal Fundamentalism?

Post #1

Post by McCulloch »

Kayky wrote:I think religious fundamentalism (regardless of brand) is a danger to society. We can only hope it dies out before it kills us!
Easyrider wrote:I think liberal fundamentalism is the real scourge.

The violent and decadent society that the liberals so despise is the very one they have created. As one Orlando Sentinel columnist noted (Paraphrasing), "They wanted sexual promiscuity, drugs, disregard for the law, no censorship of pornography, no laws against sodomy or public profanity, abortion on demand, quick and easy divorces, acceptance of homosexuality, Miranda rights, a welfare system that paid women to have illegitimate children, a tax system that penalizes marriage, and a godless education system that utilizes metal detectors and drug-sniffing dogs in our public schools. And they got it. Every last bit of it."
Easyrider wrote:Did you know there is a correlation between pornography (which liberal legislators have long supported) and violence? How does that work for you and your liberal Utopia?
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John

User avatar
Cathar1950
Site Supporter
Posts: 10503
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 12:12 pm
Location: Michigan(616)
Been thanked: 2 times

Post #11

Post by Cathar1950 »

OnceConvinced wrote:
Carico wrote:. He also said; "He who is not with me is against me." there is no middle ground because if you think that Jesus is wrong in any way, then you can't trust anything he said.
The very fact that he would make a statement like "He who is not with me is against me", shows someone with paranoid delusions (as it would in this current day, especially if they claimed to be the son of God). The fact that Jesus would appear to be suffering from such a mental state is all the more reason not to trust anything he says.
I thought Bush said that.
Acctually the unknown author of Matthew wrote:
Matthew 12:30 (American Standard Version)
30 He that is not with me is against me, and he that gathereth not with me scattereth.

Luke 11:23 (American Standard Version)

23 He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth.

Mark 9:40
"For he who is not against us is for us.

I am going with Mark and there is no reason to think the author didn't invent it.

Post Reply