Parables of the Kingdom

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Checkpoint
Prodigy
Posts: 4069
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:07 pm
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 64 times

Parables of the Kingdom

Post #1

Post by Checkpoint »

Jesus was a teacher like few others.

His teaching was both practical and spiritual, with one basic message, the good news of the Kingdom of God/Heaven.

He taught in many ways, one of which was by the use of parables.

Matthew 13 brings a number of his Kingdom parables together, about which Jesus asked and observed:
Matthew 13:

51 “Have you understood all these things?� Jesus asked.

“Yes,� they replied.

52 He said to them, “Therefore every scribe who has become a disciple in the kingdom of heaven is like the owner of a house who brings out of his storeroom new treasures as well as old.�
This thread is for us to present our understanding of these and any other Kingdom parables.

Are our views of the Kingdom confirmed or challenged by what is in Matthew 13?

Does this teaching add to, or modify or take away from, what has been your understanding of the Kingdom?
Last edited by Checkpoint on Mon May 28, 2018 4:19 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
JehovahsWitness
Savant
Posts: 22822
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
Has thanked: 892 times
Been thanked: 1331 times
Contact:

Re: Parables of the Kingdom

Post #31

Post by JehovahsWitness »

shnarkle wrote:
What do you think "the antichrist" is?
I don't understand are you saying the antichrist is Jerusalem, the literal city in the middle East? I can't find the answer to my question in your post.
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 563#919563
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681


"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" -
Romans 14:8

User avatar
ttruscott
Site Supporter
Posts: 11064
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:09 pm
Location: West Coast of Canada
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Parables of the Kingdom

Post #32

Post by ttruscott »

shnarkle wrote:
ttruscott wrote:
shnarkle wrote:
With all these references to the tribulation of antichrist, wouldn't it be better to sit back and make sure one hasn't been decieved?
Usually not thought possible for a nature that tends toward the dark side... Faith in GOD as you conceive HIM and trust in the future you believe HE has for you is still the best we can do.
I thought Christ came to allow us to do better, didn't he?
To add some detail: He came so those few of us who could be cured were cured from their enslavement to the addictive nature of evil. The implications are that not all can be cured so He did not come for us all and we don't do better as if we were striving to do so but that we are cured of a disability that we could not control or cure ourselves.
Adam could do what you're talking about.
When Adam could so could we all because it was before our first sin which enslaved us. On earth, in the garden, I do not believe that Adam was innocent nor sinless.
In fact Adam could do that because of his fall while Christ allows us to rest in the present moment without any need to refer to the future.
I can't make sense of this...
So one needn't wait on the future as it's already here now.
Faith in GOD's future for me IS the same as faith that my here and now is indeed within HIS predetermined future for my good. I do not ask, what plan do you want me to follow, Lord? I say, Thank you for giving me this life to live and experience.
PCE Theology as I see it...

We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.

This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.

User avatar
ttruscott
Site Supporter
Posts: 11064
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:09 pm
Location: West Coast of Canada
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Parables of the Kingdom

Post #33

Post by ttruscott »

shnarkle wrote:For Christ to return requires nothing more than the awareness of a self that needs to be denied. Once the self is denied, Christ returns or is made manifest in, with, and through the new creature in Christ.
How do you fit our painful discipline in our being trained in righteousness, Heb 12:5-11, into your paradigm?

IF I am selfless, am I no more aware of who I am as an individual? Or do I just do all from selflessness, nothing at all for my own good? If I deny my sinful self, does that free me from the hold sin has upon me? How does Christ help me with that if denial is equal to the self destruction of that old self?

If denying ourselves is the good that allows Christ to return to us, Paul seems to think what you suggest is impossible: Rom 7:18 I know that nothing good lives in me, that is, in my flesh; for I have the desire to do what is good, but I cannot carry it out. 19 For I do not do the good I want to do. Instead, I keep on doing the evil I do not want to do. 20 And if I do what I do not want, it is no longer I who do it, but it is sin living in me that does it. 21 So I find this law at work: Although I want to do good, evil is right there with me. 22 For in my inner being I delight in God’s law; 23 but I see another law at work in me, waging war against the law of my mind and making me a prisoner of the law of sin at work within me. 24 What a wretched man I am! Who will rescue me from this body that is subject to death? 25 Thanks be to God, who delivers me through Jesus Christ our Lord!
PCE Theology as I see it...

We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.

This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.

shnarkle
Guru
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:56 am

Re: Parables of the Kingdom

Post #34

Post by shnarkle »

JehovahsWitness wrote:
shnarkle wrote: [Replying to post 24 by JehovahsWitness]

You also say this which I don't quite understand:
First century Christians did not literally all live together
Here's why I don't understand:
All the believers were together and had everything in common. Acts 2:44

Could you possibly find a way to express in words (in complete sentences) what, if anything you find contradictory in the two sentences?

The author of Acts indicates that believers sold everything and held everything in common with each other together. Your sentence indicates that they didn't live together. This seems to contradict the author of Acts statements in that if as you say they didn't live together then where did they live? Given that they sold their properties, where else would they live except with each other?

Given that this was explicltly articulated by Christ as being a prerequisite to being a follower, it doesn't make much sense for them to then live apart from each other.

He says no one can be his disciple unless they sell everything
"for a man's life consisteth not in the abundance of the things which he possesseth...
Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat; neither for the body, what ye shall put on.23 The life is more than meat, and the body is more than raiment...O ye of little faith? 29 And seek not ye what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink, neither be ye of doubtful mind.30 For all these things do the nations of the world seek after: and your Father knoweth that ye have need of these things.31 But rather seek ye the kingdom of God; and all these things shall be added unto you.32 Fear not, little flock; for it is your Father's good pleasure to give you the kingdom.
33 Sell that ye have, and give alms; provide yourselves bags which wax not old, a treasure in the heavens that faileth not, where no thief approacheth, neither moth corrupteth....And they all with one consent began to make excuse...whosoever he be of you that forsaketh not all that he hath, he CANNOT be my disciple." - Luke 12:15,22;28-33;14:18,33

User avatar
JehovahsWitness
Savant
Posts: 22822
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
Has thanked: 892 times
Been thanked: 1331 times
Contact:

Re: Parables of the Kingdom

Post #35

Post by JehovahsWitness »

[Replying to post 34 by shnarkle]

So do you believe that every Christian from 33 to 98CE lived in one house in Jerusalem? All the Christians in Asia Minor, all the Christians in Rome, all the Christians in Greece, all of them lived in the one house in Jerusalem? Even though they lived hundreds of miles away from Jerusalem, they still lived together in one house in Jerusalem.

Is that what you believe?
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681


"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" -
Romans 14:8

shnarkle
Guru
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:56 am

Re: Parables of the Kingdom

Post #36

Post by shnarkle »

ttruscott wrote:
shnarkle wrote:For Christ to return requires nothing more than the awareness of a self that needs to be denied. Once the self is denied, Christ returns or is made manifest in, with, and through the new creature in Christ.
How do you fit our painful discipline in our being trained in righteousness, Heb 12:5-11, into your paradigm?
Quite simply by pointing out that discipline conforms us to Christ instead of to our own selfish lives.
IF I am selfless, am I no more aware of who I am as an individual?

The word "individual" comes from the word "indivisible" and there is no division in Christ. Instead their is unity, and an awareness of the great I AM rather than one's self centered identity.
Or do I just do all from selflessness, nothing at all for my own good?
Nothing at all for one's own good as "our lives are not our own" anymore. Once one denies themselves they no longer live for themselves anymore. As Christ points out, "For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it."
If I deny my sinful self, does that free me from the hold sin has upon me?
Of course. How does one sin without the self centered desire to sin?
How does Christ help me with that if denial is equal to the self destruction of that old self?

He points out that there is nothing that is too much for us to handle. We are never tempted beyond our abilities. The carnal man is incapable of doing anything except sinning. The death of the self or the carnal man ends sin. No self means there's no one left to sin. The inner man, the one who follows after the Spirit doesn't fulfill the lusts of the flesh.
If denying ourselves is the good that allows Christ to return to us, Paul seems to think what you suggest is impossible:
Not at all. In fact, he's pointing out that it is only when Christ is revealed that it can be possible. And there is nothing preventing that from happening except our selves. It is only impossible for those who think that their intentions or desires are enough. They are useless as they are simply desires and intentions. Jesus Christ isn't an intention. Christ isn't a concept to entertain our intellect. Christ is the image of God stamped upon all of humanity. The self can't see that image It is only Christ in you that allows one to see Christ in others and gives one the hope for salvation.

Rom 7:18 I know that nothing good lives in me, that is, in my flesh; for I have the desire to do what is good, but I cannot carry it out. 19 For I do not do the good I want to do. Instead, I keep on doing the evil I do not want to do. 20 And if I do what I do not want, it is no longer I who do it, but it is sin living in me that does it. 21 So I find this law at work: Although I want to do good, evil is right there with me. 22 For in my inner being I delight in God’s law; 23 but I see another law at work in me, waging war against the law of my mind and making me a prisoner of the law of sin at work within me. 24 What a wretched man I am! Who will rescue me from this body that is subject to death? 25 Thanks be to God, who delivers me through Jesus Christ our Lord![/quote]

shnarkle
Guru
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:56 am

Re: Parables of the Kingdom

Post #37

Post by shnarkle »

JehovahsWitness wrote: [Replying to post 34 by shnarkle]

So do you believe that every Christian from 33 to 98CE lived in one house in Jerusalem? All the Christians in Asia Minor, all the Christians in Rome, all the Christians in Greece, all of them lived in the one house in Jerusalem? Even though they lived hundreds of miles away from Jerusalem, they still lived together in one house in Jerusalem.

Is that what you believe?
It doesn't say that they lived in one house. It says that they lived together. There is no one more qualified to determine the prerequisites to becoming a Christian than Christ himself, and Christ points out that unless one sells all their possessions, give the proceeds to the poor, he "cannot" be a follower. It doesn't get much more simple than that. So all those who you may think were Christians living in their own homes with all of their junk still in their possession living their own lives, living for themselves, simply can't be Christians. They aren't following Christ's prerequisites.

By definition, disciples follow the discipline of those who they follow. and Christ pointed out that one cannot work for Mammon and God. If one would be a disciple of Christ they will necessarily work for God, and God alone.

User avatar
JehovahsWitness
Savant
Posts: 22822
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
Has thanked: 892 times
Been thanked: 1331 times
Contact:

Re: Parables of the Kingdom

Post #38

Post by JehovahsWitness »

shnarkle wrote:
JehovahsWitness wrote: [Replying to post 34 by shnarkle]

So do you believe that every Christian from 33 to 98CE lived in one house in Jerusalem? All the Christians in Asia Minor, all the Christians in Rome, all the Christians in Greece, all of them lived in the one house in Jerusalem? Even though they lived hundreds of miles away from Jerusalem, they still lived together in one house in Jerusalem.

Is that what you believe?
It doesn't say that they lived in one house. It says that they lived together.
So you believe that all the Christians in Asia Minor, Spain, Greece, Italy Cyprus all lived together in Jerusalem?
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681


"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" -
Romans 14:8

shnarkle
Guru
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:56 am

Re: Parables of the Kingdom

Post #39

Post by shnarkle »

ttruscott wrote:
shnarkle wrote:
ttruscott wrote:
shnarkle wrote:
With all these references to the tribulation of antichrist, wouldn't it be better to sit back and make sure one hasn't been decieved?
Usually not thought possible for a nature that tends toward the dark side... Faith in GOD as you conceive HIM and trust in the future you believe HE has for you is still the best we can do.
I thought Christ came to allow us to do better, didn't he?
To add some detail: He came so those few of us who could be cured were cured from their enslavement to the addictive nature of evil. The implications are that not all can be cured so He did not come for us all and we don't do better as if we were striving to do so but that we are cured of a disability that we could not control or cure ourselves.
Beside the point. This isn't about how many will be cured. if we can't cure this ourselves, then as I pointed out earlier it makes no difference what your conception may be, nor any ideas of the future. You're making my point for me.
Adam could do what you're talking about.
When Adam could so could we all because it was before our first sin which enslaved us. On earth, in the garden, I do not believe that Adam was innocent nor sinless.
I wasn't refering to a sinless Adam.
In fact Adam could do that because of his fall while Christ allows us to rest in the present moment without any need to refer to the future.
I can't make sense of this...
Adam fell and in so doing became instantly aware of his vulnerability, his nakedness, and shame. He hid from God because he was self aware, and one can't help but think about the future when one is self aware. Prior to Adam's sin, there was no thought for the future. Afterwards there was only their impending deaths waiting for them, and that was in the future.
So one needn't wait on the future as it's already here now.
Faith in GOD's future for me IS the same as faith that my here and now is indeed within HIS predetermined future for my good.
The problem I see with this is that you're attributing the future to God when God sees the end from the beginning. God is eternal. God isn't about the future, nor a future for you or your good. This entire drama is created by, and for Christ, and Christ alone. We are his, he is not ours. He is given to us that we may be his own cherisihed possession. We do not reconcile Christ to God, Christ reconciles us to God

shnarkle
Guru
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:56 am

Re: Parables of the Kingdom

Post #40

Post by shnarkle »

JehovahsWitness wrote:
shnarkle wrote:
JehovahsWitness wrote: [Replying to post 34 by shnarkle]

So do you believe that every Christian from 33 to 98CE lived in one house in Jerusalem? All the Christians in Asia Minor, all the Christians in Rome, all the Christians in Greece, all of them lived in the one house in Jerusalem? Even though they lived hundreds of miles away from Jerusalem, they still lived together in one house in Jerusalem.

Is that what you believe?
It doesn't say that they lived in one house. It says that they lived together.
So you believe that all the Christians in Asia Minor, Spain, Greece, Italy Cyprus all lived together in Jerusalem?
So you believe that what I posted suggests that all Christians in Asia Minor, Spain, Greece, Italy Cyprus all lived together in Jerusalem? Please elaborate on how my post suggests anything other than what Christ taught.

Christ says to go into all the world, and going into all the world doesn't prevent them from carrying out Christ's own prerequisites to sell all, and give the proceeds to the poor. The description in Acts is just that; a description. There is no prescription to live only in Jerusalem.

The prescription is in his prerequisites for becoming his followers.

Post Reply