Jehovah's Witnesses are not allowed to:
-vote
-celebrate birthdays
-celebrate Christmas or Easter
-donate or receive blood transfusions.
And if any JW openly persists in doing these things[edit to add publicly], they will be shunned or disfellowshipped, [edit to add or otherwise admonished or disciplined.]
For debate,
1) what do any of these check-list prohibitions have to do with Christianity?
2) And are any of these prohibitions compatible with the idea of Christian freedom?
3) Are these prohibitions arbitrary or legalistic?
4) And could Jehvoah's Witness as an organization flourish without these particular prohibitions and still honor God?
Please address any or all of the above.
JW organization.
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Savant
- Posts: 12236
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 8:23 pm
- Location: New England
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 16 times
JW organization.
Post #1
Last edited by Elijah John on Tue Jan 17, 2017 1:41 pm, edited 2 times in total.
My theological positions:
-God created us in His image, not the other way around.
-The Bible is redeemed by it's good parts.
-Pure monotheism, simple repentance.
-YHVH is LORD
-The real Jesus is not God, the real YHVH is not a monster.
-Eternal life is a gift from the Living God.
-Keep the Commandments, keep your salvation.
-I have accepted YHVH as my Heavenly Father, LORD and Savior.
I am inspired by Jesus to worship none but YHVH, and to serve only Him.
-God created us in His image, not the other way around.
-The Bible is redeemed by it's good parts.
-Pure monotheism, simple repentance.
-YHVH is LORD
-The real Jesus is not God, the real YHVH is not a monster.
-Eternal life is a gift from the Living God.
-Keep the Commandments, keep your salvation.
-I have accepted YHVH as my Heavenly Father, LORD and Savior.
I am inspired by Jesus to worship none but YHVH, and to serve only Him.
- JehovahsWitness
- Savant
- Posts: 22836
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
- Has thanked: 892 times
- Been thanked: 1331 times
- Contact:
Re: Problems with the plain meaning of words in Mt 27?
Post #141Not necessarily. The word "raise" without "from the dead" being added or "to life" can mean several things; its not an matter of all or nothing.postroad wrote: If the Saints were not raised to life then Christ also must have simply been spewed forth from his tomb ....
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
Re: Problems with the plain meaning of words in Mt 27?
Post #142[Replying to post 141 by JehovahsWitness] Its a resolved matter. These Saints were raised to life, waited until Christ was resurrected and then went into Jerusalem where the are recognized by many and then presumabley went back to their tombs and died again. They will be resurected a second time at the end of the ages in the same way as Lazerus.
Re: Problems with the plain meaning of words in Mt 27?
Post #143RESPONSE: So you are saying they died more than once?postroad wrote: [Replying to post 141 by JehovahsWitness] Its a resolved matter. These Saints were raised to life, waited until Christ was resurrected and then went into Jerusalem where the are recognized by many and then presumabley went back to their tombs and died again. They will be resurected a second time at the end of the ages in the same way as Lazerus.
Doesn't scripture say that a man can die but once? And what about Jesus and Elijah? Did they die twice?
How about Matthew's story about the resurrection following Christ's death just being fiction?
Re: Problems with the plain meaning of words in Mt 27?
Post #144[Replying to post 143 by polonius.advice] To me it is. And if people die and are resurected repeatedly I see an unresolvable contradiction. This contradiction somehow resolves itself by having different classes of resurected beings. Doesn't work for me, but having had such a breakthrough on the text I am content to let the matter rest.
Re: Realistic membership gain?
Post #145[Replying to post 138 by hoghead1]
[center]
None of the above ≠deeply interested in theology[/center]
And a lot of people who CALL themselves "religious" don't give a HOOT about any theology. A lot of them just kinda sorta "believe"...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nones
Boring to you?

[center]
None of the above ≠deeply interested in theology[/center]
Actually, the "nones"are people who aren't affiliated with a religion. It doesn't at all MEAN that they are interested in any kind of theology. A person who will select "None" when asked what religious affiliation they have, might be an ATHEIST.hoghead1 wrote:
Today, there is much talk about "nones," individuals who are deeply interested in theology, but have little or no interest in an affiliation with any organized religious denomination.
And a lot of people who CALL themselves "religious" don't give a HOOT about any theology. A lot of them just kinda sorta "believe"...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nones
A lot of churches have introduced musical numbers... and light shows, too.hoghead1 wrote:
I think the problem is that to many churches have become rather boring social clubs with little or no real intellectual stimulation.
Boring to you?

- onewithhim
- Savant
- Posts: 10934
- Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:56 pm
- Location: Norwich, CT
- Has thanked: 1546 times
- Been thanked: 448 times
Re: Problems with the plain meaning of words in Mt 27?
Post #146I think the breakthrough on the text is what the WTS says about it. The holy ones couldn't have been actually brought back to life because Jesus says he is going to do it "on the last day." (John 6:44) Your version of it contradicts Jesus himself.postroad wrote: [Replying to post 143 by polonius.advice] To me it is. And if people die and are resurected repeatedly I see an unresolvable contradiction. This contradiction somehow resolves itself by having different classes of resurected beings. Doesn't work for me, but having had such a breakthrough on the text I am content to let the matter rest.
Re: Problems with the plain meaning of words in Mt 27?
Post #147RESPONSE: Not at all. Actually, two different things are bing spoken of. Matthew is speaking about a physical resurrection of many people which occurred when Jesus dies. John is speaking about salvation upon the end of time.onewithhim wrote:I think the breakthrough on the text is what the WTS says about it. The holy ones couldn't have been actually brought back to life because Jesus says he is going to do it "on the last day." (John 6:44) Your version of it contradicts Jesus himself.postroad wrote: [Replying to post 143 by polonius.advice] To me it is. And if people die and are resurected repeatedly I see an unresolvable contradiction. This contradiction somehow resolves itself by having different classes of resurected beings. Doesn't work for me, but having had such a breakthrough on the text I am content to let the matter rest.
Actually, these statements are speaking of two different things.
Matthew 27:52 52The tombs also were opened, and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised.53After his resurrection they came out of the tombs and entered the holy city and appeared to many.
Meaning: Raised back to life on the day Jesus died.
John 6:44 44No one can come to me unless drawn by the Father who sent me; and I will raise that person up on the last day.
Meaning: Salvation to heaven on the last day.
- onewithhim
- Savant
- Posts: 10934
- Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:56 pm
- Location: Norwich, CT
- Has thanked: 1546 times
- Been thanked: 448 times
Re: Problems with the plain meaning of words in Mt 27?
Post #148I may be slow, but I think I'm pretty clear on this. You're right that the two scriptures are speaking of different things. In Matthew it is not a resurrection but corpses being thrown up out of their graves. John speaks of the actual resurrection of dead people back to life.polonius.advice wrote:RESPONSE: Not at all. Actually, two different things are bing spoken of. Matthew is speaking about a physical resurrection of many people which occurred when Jesus dies. John is speaking about salvation upon the end of time.onewithhim wrote:I think the breakthrough on the text is what the WTS says about it. The holy ones couldn't have been actually brought back to life because Jesus says he is going to do it "on the last day." (John 6:44) Your version of it contradicts Jesus himself.postroad wrote: [Replying to post 143 by polonius.advice] To me it is. And if people die and are resurected repeatedly I see an unresolvable contradiction. This contradiction somehow resolves itself by having different classes of resurected beings. Doesn't work for me, but having had such a breakthrough on the text I am content to let the matter rest.
Actually, these statements are speaking of two different things.
Matthew 27:52 52The tombs also were opened, and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised.53After his resurrection they came out of the tombs and entered the holy city and appeared to many.
Meaning: Raised back to life on the day Jesus died.
John 6:44 44No one can come to me unless drawn by the Father who sent me; and I will raise that person up on the last day.
Meaning: Salvation to heaven on the last day.
If people were actually raised up back to life, surely that event would have been mentioned by other Bible writers. They are silent on the event.
And all people will not be raised to heaven. Most of the people who were ever born will be raised back to life in a physical body, here on Earth.
Isaiah 45:18; Psalm 37:9-11,29
.
Re: Problems with the plain meaning of words in Mt 27?
Post #149[Replying to post 148 by onewithhim]
Have it your way then. If no one will be raised until the last day then indeed Lazerus himself was never raised to life by Jesus and the authors all lied about it. Let us all quickly tear their accounts from our Bibles. The account appears in both Luke and John.
Luke the liar even has Jesus bringing another person to life.
Have it your way then. If no one will be raised until the last day then indeed Lazerus himself was never raised to life by Jesus and the authors all lied about it. Let us all quickly tear their accounts from our Bibles. The account appears in both Luke and John.
Luke the liar even has Jesus bringing another person to life.
yes she was dead. Her spirit had vacated the premises. It had gone to wherever a persons spirit goes when they die and that person presumably had to die again. Did anyone notice that Jesus lied. Why yes he did bear false witness. That girl was not in a deep sleep. She was dead by any definition. The spirit had left her body and not just momentarily. The mourning was already in progress.
Luke 8:51-56New International Version (NIV)
51 When he arrived at the house of Jairus, he did not let anyone go in with him except Peter, John and James, and the child’s father and mother. 52 Meanwhile, all the people were wailing and mourning for her. “Stop wailing,� Jesus said. “She is not dead but asleep.�o
53 They laughed at him, knowing that she was dead. 54 But he took her by the hand and said, “My child, get up!� 55 Her spirit returned, and at once she stood up. Then I yJesus told them to give her something to eat. 56 Her parents were astonished, but he ordered them not to tell anyone what had happened.
- JehovahsWitness
- Savant
- Posts: 22836
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
- Has thanked: 892 times
- Been thanked: 1331 times
- Contact:
Re: Problems with the plain meaning of words in Mt 27?
Post #150Lazarus and the other 8 cases of resurrections mentioned in scripture, all died again.postroad wrote: [Replying to post 148 by onewithhim]
Have it your way then. If no one will be raised until the last day then indeed Lazerus himself was never raised to life by Jesus and the authors all lied about it.
Jesus was the first to be raised to eternal life; he was the first to be raised to immortality as a spirit,. Nobody, not even king David, went to heaven beforeally Jesus opended the way there.
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8