Should stem cells be allowed for medical reasons? If yes, should they allow all types or should they limit the uses?
A primer on stem cells
Stem Cell Research
Moderator: Moderators
- Kuan
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 1806
- Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:21 am
- Location: Rexburg, the Frozen Wasteland
- Contact:
Stem Cell Research
Post #1"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
- Voltaire
Kung may ayaw, may dahilan. Kung may gusto, may paraan.
- Voltaire
Kung may ayaw, may dahilan. Kung may gusto, may paraan.
Post #11
Teaching physics isn't really the job of the government, either.[color=green]WinePusher[/color] wrote:No no no. They're aganist giving public schools the authority to teach sexual procedure or conduct, as that is NOT the job of government run public schools, but rather the job of the Parents, not the school.
I say that teachers should teach appropriate sexual practices, because it's blatantly obvious that parents aren't doing a good job.
-
- Student
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 7:21 pm
Re: Stem Cell Research
Post #12To the Principalities of the Westmormon boy51 wrote:Should stem cells be allowed for medical reasons? If yes, should they allow all types or should they limit the uses?
A primer on stem cells
Know this that although you have perfected your Beauty - it shall fade like a rose of Sharon in the Valley of BethAven.
This is a demonic evil which men in the vileness of their own selfwill have thought of. This is their doom. For they have said come let us go up to the Tree of life-
This is what have been written of old- they have become instruments of cruelty in the hands of the mighty.
What shall be their later state - if not darkness and a weeping and a gnashing of teeths
- Kuan
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 1806
- Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:21 am
- Location: Rexburg, the Frozen Wasteland
- Contact:
Post #14
I think it is actualy. Why? Because most parents dont have a knowledge of primary schooling and secondary school G.E. but all parents have knowledge on procreation (hence the children.) Thats why it becomes there responsibility.AkiThePirate wrote:Teaching physics isn't really the job of the government, either.[color=green]WinePusher[/color] wrote:No no no. They're aganist giving public schools the authority to teach sexual procedure or conduct, as that is NOT the job of government run public schools, but rather the job of the Parents, not the school.
I say that teachers should teach appropriate sexual practices, because it's blatantly obvious that parents aren't doing a good job.
I'd have to say that responsibility is something society will no longer have in the future.Goat wrote:Not if we also teach this little thing known as 'RESPONSIBLITIY and BIRTH CONTROL.mormon boy51 wrote:Yes and that all makes. Still, how far do we want to take our knowledge of medicine? Wouldn't it be unethical to keep natural selection from taking its course? The same proccess that gave us this knowledge? Is it possible that from our knowledge of medicine and preventing natural selection because of it that we are causing overpopulation on earth? Couldn't this add even more on our already stressed planet?
The very things that the people who are against stem cell research and abortion are against.
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
- Voltaire
Kung may ayaw, may dahilan. Kung may gusto, may paraan.
- Voltaire
Kung may ayaw, may dahilan. Kung may gusto, may paraan.
Post #15
There's a substantial difference between knowing where to put it, and knowing how to be sexually responsible.[color=cyan]mormon boy51[/color] wrote:I think it is actualy. Why? Because most parents dont have a knowledge of primary schooling and secondary school G.E. but all parents have knowledge on procreation (hence the children.) Thats why it becomes there responsibility.
Your parents probably won't teach you how to use a condom, what can be done to prevent and treat STIs, etc.
I think the general publics' knowledge of sex is about as good as their knowledge of physics. If you would like to see and example, walk by a club at 2a.m. on a Saturday.
[color=orange]mormon boy51[/color] wrote:I'd have to say that responsibility is something society will no longer have in the future.

Please, elaborate.
- Kuan
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 1806
- Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:21 am
- Location: Rexburg, the Frozen Wasteland
- Contact:
Post #16
I live in Utah I cant walk by a club. There is no club to walk by. I just think that society is losing its sense of responsibility.AkiThePirate wrote:There's a substantial difference between knowing where to put it, and knowing how to be sexually responsible.[color=cyan]mormon boy51[/color] wrote:I think it is actualy. Why? Because most parents dont have a knowledge of primary schooling and secondary school G.E. but all parents have knowledge on procreation (hence the children.) Thats why it becomes there responsibility.
Your parents probably won't teach you how to use a condom, what can be done to prevent and treat STIs, etc.
I think the general publics' knowledge of sex is about as good as their knowledge of physics. If you would like to see and example, walk by a club at 2a.m. on a Saturday.[color=orange]mormon boy51[/color] wrote:I'd have to say that responsibility is something society will no longer have in the future.![]()
Please, elaborate.
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
- Voltaire
Kung may ayaw, may dahilan. Kung may gusto, may paraan.
- Voltaire
Kung may ayaw, may dahilan. Kung may gusto, may paraan.
- Goat
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24999
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Post #17
Actually , there are clubs in Utah, you just got to know where to look. It just isn't at blatant as many other places...mormon boy51 wrote: I live in Utah I cant walk by a club. There is no club to walk by. I just think that society is losing its sense of responsibility.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�
Steven Novella
Steven Novella
- Kuan
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 1806
- Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:21 am
- Location: Rexburg, the Frozen Wasteland
- Contact:
Post #18
Anyways back OT. How did sex relate to this discussion again?
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
- Voltaire
Kung may ayaw, may dahilan. Kung may gusto, may paraan.
- Voltaire
Kung may ayaw, may dahilan. Kung may gusto, may paraan.
- Kuan
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 1806
- Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:21 am
- Location: Rexburg, the Frozen Wasteland
- Contact:
Post #20
How does that relate to a loss of responsiblity?AkiThePirate wrote:Society isn't losing responsibility, it's just becoming more secular.
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
- Voltaire
Kung may ayaw, may dahilan. Kung may gusto, may paraan.
- Voltaire
Kung may ayaw, may dahilan. Kung may gusto, may paraan.