What is the name above all names?

[Wootah]

Philippians 2:9 Therefore God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name that is above every name, 10 so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, 11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father

.

What is the name above all names?

[Capbook]

I don't prefer closed minded anybody.

You arguments give much weight to non-converted (closed minded) Jews.
Review your post.

I think that you should review my post. I have never supported close-minded Jews.

You don't remember I colored blue above?

You're not clear on what your point is. Please explain.

My point is based on the commentary of an open minded Jew Dr. Stern whom I quoted as
even the Jewish NT Commentary believe that Jesus the Messiah is YHWH. Meaning God.
But you rebut it, using the stand of many closed minded Jews that never accepts Jesus as the Messiah.

Philippians 2:9-11
God has given him the name, that is, the character and authority, above every name (v. 9). In vv. 10-11 Sha’ul reveals the extraordinary fact that this name above every name is Adonai! He states, moreover, that the day is coming when every tongue will acknowledge it—angelic (in heaven), human (on earth) and demonic (under the earth).
Yeshua the Messiah is Adonai (Greek kurios). As explained at Mt 1:20 N, the Greek word “kurios” can mean anything from the tetragrammaton (YHVH, “Jehovah,” the personal name of God, rendered “Adonai” in the Jewish New Testament) to “Lord” (in the sense of God as universal ruler) to “lord” (in the human sense) to merely “sir” (a respectful form of address). Because Isaiah 45:23, which in its own context applies to YHVH, is quoted in v. 10 in reference to Yeshua, I believe this verse teaches that Yeshua the Messiah is YHVH and not only “Lord” in a lesser sense.
(from Jewish New Testament Commentary)

You would take the word of a Pharisee as the truth? Remember, the religious leaders were responsible for killing the Son of God. (Acts 2:36)

Is Dr. Stern a Pharisee?

He is if he says that Jehovah is Jesus.

But Pharisaic group does not exist anymore today, see link below;

Following the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 AD, Pharisaic beliefs became the foundational, liturgical, and ritualistic basis for Rabbinic Judaism. Although the group does not exist anymore.
https://www.google.com/search?q=are+the ... e&ie=UTF-8

Would you agree now that Dr. Stern is not a Pharisee?

[onewithhim]

You arguments give much weight to non-converted (closed minded) Jews.
Review your post.

I think that you should review my post. I have never supported close-minded Jews.

You don't remember I colored blue above?

You're not clear on what your point is. Please explain.

My point is based on the commentary of an open minded Jew Dr. Stern whom I quoted as
even the Jewish NT Commentary believe that Jesus the Messiah is YHWH. Meaning God.
But you rebut it, using the stand of many closed minded Jews that never accepts Jesus as the Messiah.

Philippians 2:9-11
God has given him the name, that is, the character and authority, above every name (v. 9). In vv. 10-11 Sha’ul reveals the extraordinary fact that this name above every name is Adonai! He states, moreover, that the day is coming when every tongue will acknowledge it—angelic (in heaven), human (on earth) and demonic (under the earth).
Yeshua the Messiah is Adonai (Greek kurios). As explained at Mt 1:20 N, the Greek word “kurios” can mean anything from the tetragrammaton (YHVH, “Jehovah,” the personal name of God, rendered “Adonai” in the Jewish New Testament) to “Lord” (in the sense of God as universal ruler) to “lord” (in the human sense) to merely “sir” (a respectful form of address). Because Isaiah 45:23, which in its own context applies to YHVH, is quoted in v. 10 in reference to Yeshua, I believe this verse teaches that Yeshua the Messiah is YHVH and not only “Lord” in a lesser sense.
(from Jewish New Testament Commentary)

You would take the word of a Pharisee as the truth? Remember, the religious leaders were responsible for killing the Son of God. (Acts 2:36)

Is Dr. Stern a Pharisee?

He is if he says that Jehovah is Jesus.

But Pharisaic group does not exist anymore today, see link below;

Following the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 AD, Pharisaic beliefs became the foundational, liturgical, and ritualistic basis for Rabbinic Judaism. Although the group does not exist anymore.
https://www.google.com/search?q=are+the ... e&ie=UTF-8

Would you agree now that Dr. Stern is not a Pharisee?

The group might not exist anymore, but if Dr. Stern said that Jesus is Jehovah he is treading where the Pharisees walked.

[Capbook]

I think that you should review my post. I have never supported close-minded Jews.

You don't remember I colored blue above?

You're not clear on what your point is. Please explain.

My point is based on the commentary of an open minded Jew Dr. Stern whom I quoted as
even the Jewish NT Commentary believe that Jesus the Messiah is YHWH. Meaning God.
But you rebut it, using the stand of many closed minded Jews that never accepts Jesus as the Messiah.

Philippians 2:9-11
God has given him the name, that is, the character and authority, above every name (v. 9). In vv. 10-11 Sha’ul reveals the extraordinary fact that this name above every name is Adonai! He states, moreover, that the day is coming when every tongue will acknowledge it—angelic (in heaven), human (on earth) and demonic (under the earth).
Yeshua the Messiah is Adonai (Greek kurios). As explained at Mt 1:20 N, the Greek word “kurios” can mean anything from the tetragrammaton (YHVH, “Jehovah,” the personal name of God, rendered “Adonai” in the Jewish New Testament) to “Lord” (in the sense of God as universal ruler) to “lord” (in the human sense) to merely “sir” (a respectful form of address). Because Isaiah 45:23, which in its own context applies to YHVH, is quoted in v. 10 in reference to Yeshua, I believe this verse teaches that Yeshua the Messiah is YHVH and not only “Lord” in a lesser sense.
(from Jewish New Testament Commentary)

You would take the word of a Pharisee as the truth? Remember, the religious leaders were responsible for killing the Son of God. (Acts 2:36)

Is Dr. Stern a Pharisee?

He is if he says that Jehovah is Jesus.

But Pharisaic group does not exist anymore today, see link below;

Following the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 AD, Pharisaic beliefs became the foundational, liturgical, and ritualistic basis for Rabbinic Judaism. Although the group does not exist anymore.
https://www.google.com/search?q=are+the ... e&ie=UTF-8

Would you agree now that Dr. Stern is not a Pharisee?

The group might not exist anymore, but if Dr. Stern said that Jesus is Jehovah he is treading where the Pharisees walked.

Can you prove in the Bible that the Pharisees says that Jehovah is Jesus?
As you equate Dr. Stern to them.

[onewithhim]

You don't remember I colored blue above?

You're not clear on what your point is. Please explain.

My point is based on the commentary of an open minded Jew Dr. Stern whom I quoted as
even the Jewish NT Commentary believe that Jesus the Messiah is YHWH. Meaning God.
But you rebut it, using the stand of many closed minded Jews that never accepts Jesus as the Messiah.

Philippians 2:9-11
God has given him the name, that is, the character and authority, above every name (v. 9). In vv. 10-11 Sha’ul reveals the extraordinary fact that this name above every name is Adonai! He states, moreover, that the day is coming when every tongue will acknowledge it—angelic (in heaven), human (on earth) and demonic (under the earth).
Yeshua the Messiah is Adonai (Greek kurios). As explained at Mt 1:20 N, the Greek word “kurios” can mean anything from the tetragrammaton (YHVH, “Jehovah,” the personal name of God, rendered “Adonai” in the Jewish New Testament) to “Lord” (in the sense of God as universal ruler) to “lord” (in the human sense) to merely “sir” (a respectful form of address). Because Isaiah 45:23, which in its own context applies to YHVH, is quoted in v. 10 in reference to Yeshua, I believe this verse teaches that Yeshua the Messiah is YHVH and not only “Lord” in a lesser sense.
(from Jewish New Testament Commentary)

You would take the word of a Pharisee as the truth? Remember, the religious leaders were responsible for killing the Son of God. (Acts 2:36)

Is Dr. Stern a Pharisee?

He is if he says that Jehovah is Jesus.

But Pharisaic group does not exist anymore today, see link below;

Following the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 AD, Pharisaic beliefs became the foundational, liturgical, and ritualistic basis for Rabbinic Judaism. Although the group does not exist anymore.
https://www.google.com/search?q=are+the ... e&ie=UTF-8

Would you agree now that Dr. Stern is not a Pharisee?

The group might not exist anymore, but if Dr. Stern said that Jesus is Jehovah he is treading where the Pharisees walked.

Can you prove in the Bible that the Pharisees says that Jehovah is Jesus?
As you equate Dr. Stern to them.

No. YOU posted a section of your man's statements about God and Jesus. It is from your own posting.

[Capbook]

You're not clear on what your point is. Please explain.

My point is based on the commentary of an open minded Jew Dr. Stern whom I quoted as
even the Jewish NT Commentary believe that Jesus the Messiah is YHWH. Meaning God.
But you rebut it, using the stand of many closed minded Jews that never accepts Jesus as the Messiah.

Philippians 2:9-11
God has given him the name, that is, the character and authority, above every name (v. 9). In vv. 10-11 Sha’ul reveals the extraordinary fact that this name above every name is Adonai! He states, moreover, that the day is coming when every tongue will acknowledge it—angelic (in heaven), human (on earth) and demonic (under the earth).
Yeshua the Messiah is Adonai (Greek kurios). As explained at Mt 1:20 N, the Greek word “kurios” can mean anything from the tetragrammaton (YHVH, “Jehovah,” the personal name of God, rendered “Adonai” in the Jewish New Testament) to “Lord” (in the sense of God as universal ruler) to “lord” (in the human sense) to merely “sir” (a respectful form of address). Because Isaiah 45:23, which in its own context applies to YHVH, is quoted in v. 10 in reference to Yeshua, I believe this verse teaches that Yeshua the Messiah is YHVH and not only “Lord” in a lesser sense.
(from Jewish New Testament Commentary)

You would take the word of a Pharisee as the truth? Remember, the religious leaders were responsible for killing the Son of God. (Acts 2:36)

Is Dr. Stern a Pharisee?

He is if he says that Jehovah is Jesus.

But Pharisaic group does not exist anymore today, see link below;

Following the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 AD, Pharisaic beliefs became the foundational, liturgical, and ritualistic basis for Rabbinic Judaism. Although the group does not exist anymore.
https://www.google.com/search?q=are+the ... e&ie=UTF-8

Would you agree now that Dr. Stern is not a Pharisee?

The group might not exist anymore, but if Dr. Stern said that Jesus is Jehovah he is treading where the Pharisees walked.

Can you prove in the Bible that the Pharisees says that Jehovah is Jesus?
As you equate Dr. Stern to them.

No. YOU posted a section of your man's statements about God and Jesus. It is from your own posting.

Did you not replied that Dr. Stern would be a Pharisee if he says Jehovah is Jesus? See I colored blue above.
Then prove where in the Bible that a belief that "Jehovah is Jesus" is a Pharisee's beliefs?