I have a challenge for Trinitarians. Prove that Jesus Christ is God from Scripture. But here's the rub, do so without using any references from the Gospel of John, or any of the Epistles or the Book of Revelation.
Can you do it?
Challenge, prove that Jesus is "God"
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Savant
- Posts: 12236
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 8:23 pm
- Location: New England
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 16 times
Challenge, prove that Jesus is "God"
Post #1 My theological positions:
-God created us in His image, not the other way around.
-The Bible is redeemed by it's good parts.
-Pure monotheism, simple repentance.
-YHVH is LORD
-The real Jesus is not God, the real YHVH is not a monster.
-Eternal life is a gift from the Living God.
-Keep the Commandments, keep your salvation.
-I have accepted YHVH as my Heavenly Father, LORD and Savior.
I am inspired by Jesus to worship none but YHVH, and to serve only Him.
-God created us in His image, not the other way around.
-The Bible is redeemed by it's good parts.
-Pure monotheism, simple repentance.
-YHVH is LORD
-The real Jesus is not God, the real YHVH is not a monster.
-Eternal life is a gift from the Living God.
-Keep the Commandments, keep your salvation.
-I have accepted YHVH as my Heavenly Father, LORD and Savior.
I am inspired by Jesus to worship none but YHVH, and to serve only Him.
Post #71
[Replying to post 69 by The Tanager]
If you are going to keep insisting that John 1:1 proves that Jesus is God, start a new discussion of John 1:1c and I will show you why it is not true.
I don't see why I need to have a verse outside of John 1:1 to show this, unless you can show it definitely does not show Jesus is God.
If you are going to keep insisting that John 1:1 proves that Jesus is God, start a new discussion of John 1:1c and I will show you why it is not true.
- The Tanager
- Savant
- Posts: 5732
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2015 11:08 am
- Has thanked: 76 times
- Been thanked: 217 times
Post #72
You brought up John 20 in this thread to speak against the interpretation of Mark 2 that I have, so why can't I talk about John 1:1 in relation to it? Also, feel free to come on over to the "Which is Risker?" thread to talk about John 1:1 and others.tigger2 wrote:If you are going to keep insisting that John 1:1 proves that Jesus is God, start a new discussion of John 1:1c and I will show you why it is not true.
Post #73
Please read the post (#61) at the top of this page.The Tanager wrote:You brought up John 20 in this thread to speak against the interpretation of Mark 2 that I have, so why can't I talk about John 1:1 in relation to it? Also, feel free to come on over to the "Which is Risker?" thread to talk about John 1:1 and others.tigger2 wrote:If you are going to keep insisting that John 1:1 proves that Jesus is God, start a new discussion of John 1:1c and I will show you why it is not true.
I am not speaking of your using John 1:1 references on this thread, but a moderator is. I simply am objecting to your insistence that John 1:1 proves Jesus is God!
If you don't wish to discuss it fully, then don't. In either case, we are asked not to use examples from John on this thread.
- The Tanager
- Savant
- Posts: 5732
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2015 11:08 am
- Has thanked: 76 times
- Been thanked: 217 times
Post #74
Ultimately, we are discussing Mark 2. I think it is okay to bring passages from John to bear upon our discussion of Mark 2, which fits under the original intent of this thread. It's a blurry area, but we had been allowed to do that throughout this whole thread, but as I said in post #62, I'd be fine moving the discussion elsewhere if the moderator cleared that up. I even gave you another thread where we could fully discuss it, "Which is Risker?". Come on over, because I would love to hear your thoughts and challenge my own on that verse and others that you would probably have thoughts on that definitely don't fit in this thread.tigger2 wrote:Please read the post (#61) at the top of this page.
I am not speaking of your using John 1:1 references on this thread, but a moderator is. I simply am objecting to your insistence that John 1:1 proves Jesus is God!
If you don't wish to discuss it fully, then don't. In either case, we are asked not to use examples from John on this thread.
Post #75
The Tanager wrote:Ultimately, we are discussing Mark 2. I think it is okay to bring passages from John to bear upon our discussion of Mark 2, which fits under the original intent of this thread. It's a blurry area, but we had been allowed to do that throughout this whole thread, but as I said in post #62, I'd be fine moving the discussion elsewhere if the moderator cleared that up. I even gave you another thread where we could fully discuss it, "Which is Risker?". Come on over, because I would love to hear your thoughts and challenge my own on that verse and others that you would probably have thoughts on that definitely don't fit in this thread.tigger2 wrote:Please read the post (#61) at the top of this page.
I am not speaking of your using John 1:1 references on this thread, but a moderator is. I simply am objecting to your insistence that John 1:1 proves Jesus is God!
If you don't wish to discuss it fully, then don't. In either case, we are asked not to use examples from John on this thread.
I would very much prefer a discussion limited to John 1:1c. How about a head-to-head discussion? https://debatingchristianity.com/forum ... php?f=40
- JehovahsWitness
- Savant
- Posts: 22822
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
- Has thanked: 892 times
- Been thanked: 1331 times
- Contact:
Post #76
The Tanager wrote:We are ultimately talking about Mark 2. The question there is where Jesus' ability to forgive sins comes from. John 20 gives us one way that can happen (the If-S conditional, as I called it). There is another way that can happen (the If-G conditional, as I called it). I don't see where the John 20 way applies to Jesus in Scripture, but feel free to point that Scripture out. I bring in John 1:1 to show how the If-G conditional applies to Jesus. I don't see why I need to have a verse outside of John 1:1 to show this, unless you can show it definitely does not show Jesus is God. There are other verses (as you are aware from that other thread we are talking in right now), but I'm not sure why you think John 1:1 shouldn't be talked about.JehovahsWitness wrote:Exactly. We know giving authority to forgive sins can be delegated but will need to look elsewhere to establish if this was the case forJesus. So outside of John 1:1 what scripture are you going to use as recall? It can't be Mark 2 (since it's the scripture in question) I presume its not John 20, so which scripture are you turning to to support your point?
I don't see any other scriptures in your response, so would it be fair to say John 1:1 is your only support?
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
- The Tanager
- Savant
- Posts: 5732
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2015 11:08 am
- Has thanked: 76 times
- Been thanked: 217 times
- The Tanager
- Savant
- Posts: 5732
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2015 11:08 am
- Has thanked: 76 times
- Been thanked: 217 times
Post #78
We must only use Mark, Matthew, Luke-Acts and the Tanakh in this discussion. So, if you want to keep disputing Mark 2 here you'd have to find something other than John 20:19-23 to do so. I think that is unfair to you, so I'm just going to continue our discussion on the other thread. It is point #4 and in my next post I will try to sum it up there and you can respond there.JehovahsWitness wrote:I don't see any other scriptures in your response, so would it be fair to say John 1:1 is your only support?
- JehovahsWitness
- Savant
- Posts: 22822
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
- Has thanked: 892 times
- Been thanked: 1331 times
- Contact:
Post #79
[Replying to post 77 by The Tanager]
Agreed.
So can you now list the scriptures you will be using here allowed in the this thread or do you have none?
Agreed.
So can you now list the scriptures you will be using here allowed in the this thread or do you have none?
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
- The Tanager
- Savant
- Posts: 5732
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2015 11:08 am
- Has thanked: 76 times
- Been thanked: 217 times
Post #80
[Replying to post 78 by JehovahsWitness]
This is the argument concerning Mark 2, under the strict terms of this thread. I think these terms are more unfair to your position than my own, but if you want to do it, I'll go through the thought exercise with you.
P1: Only God can (ultimately) forgive sins (Micah 7:18 and the implications of the rest of the Tanakh)
P2: Jesus can (ultimately) forgive sins (Mark 2)
C: Therefore, Jesus is God.
What is the scripture that contradicts that?
This is the argument concerning Mark 2, under the strict terms of this thread. I think these terms are more unfair to your position than my own, but if you want to do it, I'll go through the thought exercise with you.
P1: Only God can (ultimately) forgive sins (Micah 7:18 and the implications of the rest of the Tanakh)
P2: Jesus can (ultimately) forgive sins (Mark 2)
C: Therefore, Jesus is God.
What is the scripture that contradicts that?