Quote:
Little league and picnics, Church socials and happy get togethers. I don't see that in the leftist ranting hordes constantly marching to force Christians to alter their lifestyles to celebrate STD behaviors and those that get them from a life of wanton lascivious licentiousness. Or godless humanism that has literally taught the young that there are no absolutes or a future worth living.
Little League Picnics, church socials and happy get-togethers what are you talking about? Is this something exclusive to your religion?
What does "traditional family values" and "Christians" have in common? Synonym.
Any one can and do enjoy such things. Is there a point or do you just stick stuff anywhere to fill in the nonsense of the rest of the paragraph?
I am not a liberal theologian. Most people seem to know that. "Non" sense is not my gig.
I do not see any leftist hordes marching or forcing Christians to do anything or alter their life styles.
Soulforce.org. Go there. They are demanding just that. Harrassment and all.
No one is celebrating SDT behaviors. You seem to think it is just homosexuals. But you are wrong. Humanist godless or not are not teaching that there are no absolutes or a future not worth living.
To a Christian, a future without Christ Jesus is a future not worth living. Eternally so. Click on "the Bible" at any book store. That's a joke son. I . . . am . . . literally . . . saying . . . "Read the Bible with a New Testament in it. . . Read the New Testament. . .."
It will give you knowledge of what Christians believe.
You seem to think unless they are following what you think is some kind of biblical mandate that there are no rules and no meaning.
And what is the anti-Christian proclaiming? Follow secularism. No deviating.
Following the bible is not even moral behavior it is obedience. You view of the bible offers even less.
Yet common sense stands in opposition to your point of view. Christians proclaim a man should be a good person and if a father love his wife and children and take care of them, The way Christ Jesus indicated when He defined marriage and divorce as breaking up a joining of a man and a woman.
And-that-that-was-bad.
We Christians call that "moral advice." From God.
Quote:
Certainly no happiness in the secular crowds trying to find a way to invent a new kind of family, when it is so clear that deviating from the real family has only injured the children wandering around wondering "why" they were born into a brpken family.
Is this more rhetorical nonsense from you? Broken families exist in half the Christians lives too.
Guess they should have followed their own advice. The advice they got from God. Look what happens when you don't follow God's advice.
Some times “real” families mess up their children, yes even Christians.
So then men can marry men now? Where's the logic in that? You don't like broken families so you are going to invent a new "kind" of family?
Certainly not what the Bible condones.
Sometimes they are not born in a broken family but they happen, even to Christian bible-believers.
And? And? And? And?
The Bible promotes only a "returning" to the way of God. For Christians that is. The Bible does not promote or condone letting chaos become a new definition of logic.
You have a one-dimensional view that often excludes your own problems.
Really? What "problems" am I in denial of? My confidence comes from the Rock of Ages.
Not from "things change, because we don't like the Bible."
Quote:
Yet now we see both the sexual deviant and those that deny a god "sounding so Christian."
So you think that is a bad thing. When I was hungry you feed me? Does that ring a bell?
Compared to: "Sodomizing forty guys a month and we offer condoms?" Or: "Pregnant? Don't like it" Kill your unborn child?" Or: "Don't get a job and we'll
take money from honest people so you can stay crack-addicted and lazy?"
Or: "The Word was with God and the Word was God. No 'it' wasn't because evolution means there is no God."
Those offerings?
Things change?
Quote:
Bringing people the good news is not defined by presenting chaos as the solution to problems or a lifestyle of substance and value.
That makes no sense. I bet you wanted to mean something.
Atheism and secularism and humanism versus Christ Jesus as God. Plain enough? I'll have more time Thursday to braek things down even further if necessary.
Quote:
There is a quilt with the names of many that have been entered into the record of that life lived for the quest of fleshly desires reining supreme over the caring about others.
It is a disease not fleshly desires killing them.
In America AIDS was spread through promiscuity and drug use. Clear enough?
It is not limited to homosexuals.
True. The drug addicts were not all gay. I'm only guessing. But AIDS transmission I have pretty accurately as history serves me.
It is not some fleshly desire reining supreme ignoring the caring of others.
Back up and see what "cuased the spread of AIDS." Promiscuity and drug addicts sharing with others. Not exactly the Gospel kiind though.
It seems the quilt if any thing is a sign of caring.
It is just a tombstone made of cloth. I know some of the names on it.
Quote:
The Bible does not condone a faith devoid of God or of conscience.
What would be a faith devoid of God in your mind?
Humanism. Secularism. What Liberalism has become. Everyone knows what I think on that matter. There is no denying that even from my greatest adversaries here. Also of course, a faith saying "do what thou wilt." The last one of course does recognize the god status given to Molech, Baal, and Satan though.
Quote:
Watching people that live their lives for pure selfishness and their personal gratification is always going to evoke a dramatic and emotional response from the followers of the Risen Christ.
I don’t think it is pure selfishness is the subject.
Repentance is the key. I notice with much interest that repenting is seen as "not enough" to erase sins to some people on these threads. Yet, in the Bible, to God, forgiveness means erasing the hard drive of data on the eternal computer of debt.
You are interjecting that into your definitions.
No I am not. I am countering leftist/liberal motives. I am showing what their definitions have altered from the original.
Yes you are dramatic and emotional among other flaws. You are getting desperate.
Desperation is how you must paint me to make yourself feel better? My confidence is no cover and most of my opposition knows that all too well. I have never once denied my flaws and I have never lied about my adversaries. I just present facts and remain satisfied about the fallout.
Bubbeye.
