Jonah wrote:WOW! Good point.
Of course, it was meant as
satire. I discovered that many popes had chosen the name "Innocent." Does anyone else see the irony in the leader of a church teaching that all mankind is born with original sin -- calling themselves "Innocent?" How can they be innocent? Did their parents buy a dispensation?
Jonah wrote:A good exemplar of how Original Sin is a sex problem in the western Christian mind.
"Original sin" is meaningless anyway since a few sprinkles of water over the baby cures all:
So if an infant dies, his eternal destination is based on whether or not his parents had him or her baptised in time.
Jonah wrote:I wonder. Has anyone in the churches come up with an theological explanation as to how a person born out of an invitro procedure ends up a sinner from Adam?
I'm no expert, but I'll make a wild guess that in all outside the womb produced pregnancies, original sin is passed through the sperm procurement process. Need I say more? (God I hope not).
Jonah wrote:I mean, if they're going to make the assertion that it comes from Adam, shouldn't they have to explain how it actually works?
It doesn't work, and the original error multiplies to protect the original erroneous theology. For example:
1)
Original error: All mankind is born with original sin.
Problem: But Jesus was born as a man. How can we handle that? Ah, Jesus was born of a virgin. Therefore:
2)
Secondary error protecting the original: Original sin is passed through lust during sexual intercourse.
Problem: Now they have God commanding us to sin:
Genesis 1:22 wrote:And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, . . .