JW organization.

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
Elijah John
Savant
Posts: 12236
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 8:23 pm
Location: New England
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 16 times

JW organization.

Post #1

Post by Elijah John »

Jehovah's Witnesses are not allowed to:

-vote
-celebrate birthdays
-celebrate Christmas or Easter
-donate or receive blood transfusions.

And if any JW openly persists in doing these things[edit to add publicly], they will be shunned or disfellowshipped, [edit to add or otherwise admonished or disciplined.]

For debate,

1) what do any of these check-list prohibitions have to do with Christianity?

2) And are any of these prohibitions compatible with the idea of Christian freedom?

3) Are these prohibitions arbitrary or legalistic?

4) And could Jehvoah's Witness as an organization flourish without these particular prohibitions and still honor God?

Please address any or all of the above.
Last edited by Elijah John on Tue Jan 17, 2017 1:41 pm, edited 2 times in total.
My theological positions:

-God created us in His image, not the other way around.
-The Bible is redeemed by it's good parts.
-Pure monotheism, simple repentance.
-YHVH is LORD
-The real Jesus is not God, the real YHVH is not a monster.
-Eternal life is a gift from the Living God.
-Keep the Commandments, keep your salvation.
-I have accepted YHVH as my Heavenly Father, LORD and Savior.

I am inspired by Jesus to worship none but YHVH, and to serve only Him.

User avatar
JehovahsWitness
Savant
Posts: 22822
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
Has thanked: 892 times
Been thanked: 1331 times
Contact:

Re: Problems with the plain meaning of words in Mt 27?

Post #141

Post by JehovahsWitness »

postroad wrote: If the Saints were not raised to life then Christ also must have simply been spewed forth from his tomb ....
Not necessarily. The word "raise" without "from the dead" being added or "to life" can mean several things; its not an matter of all or nothing.
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681


"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" -
Romans 14:8

postroad
Prodigy
Posts: 2882
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 9:58 am

Re: Problems with the plain meaning of words in Mt 27?

Post #142

Post by postroad »

[Replying to post 141 by JehovahsWitness] Its a resolved matter. These Saints were raised to life, waited until Christ was resurrected and then went into Jerusalem where the are recognized by many and then presumabley went back to their tombs and died again. They will be resurected a second time at the end of the ages in the same way as Lazerus.

polonius
Prodigy
Posts: 3904
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2015 3:03 pm
Location: Oregon
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Problems with the plain meaning of words in Mt 27?

Post #143

Post by polonius »

postroad wrote: [Replying to post 141 by JehovahsWitness] Its a resolved matter. These Saints were raised to life, waited until Christ was resurrected and then went into Jerusalem where the are recognized by many and then presumabley went back to their tombs and died again. They will be resurected a second time at the end of the ages in the same way as Lazerus.
RESPONSE: So you are saying they died more than once?

Doesn't scripture say that a man can die but once? And what about Jesus and Elijah? Did they die twice?

How about Matthew's story about the resurrection following Christ's death just being fiction?

postroad
Prodigy
Posts: 2882
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 9:58 am

Re: Problems with the plain meaning of words in Mt 27?

Post #144

Post by postroad »

[Replying to post 143 by polonius.advice] To me it is. And if people die and are resurected repeatedly I see an unresolvable contradiction. This contradiction somehow resolves itself by having different classes of resurected beings. Doesn't work for me, but having had such a breakthrough on the text I am content to let the matter rest.

User avatar
Blastcat
Banned
Banned
Posts: 5948
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 4:18 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Realistic membership gain?

Post #145

Post by Blastcat »

[Replying to post 138 by hoghead1]




[center]
None of the above ≠ deeply interested in theology
[/center]

hoghead1 wrote:
Today, there is much talk about "nones," individuals who are deeply interested in theology, but have little or no interest in an affiliation with any organized religious denomination.
Actually, the "nones"are people who aren't affiliated with a religion. It doesn't at all MEAN that they are interested in any kind of theology. A person who will select "None" when asked what religious affiliation they have, might be an ATHEIST.

And a lot of people who CALL themselves "religious" don't give a HOOT about any theology. A lot of them just kinda sorta "believe"...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nones

hoghead1 wrote:
I think the problem is that to many churches have become rather boring social clubs with little or no real intellectual stimulation.
A lot of churches have introduced musical numbers... and light shows, too.
Boring to you?


:)

User avatar
onewithhim
Savant
Posts: 10934
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:56 pm
Location: Norwich, CT
Has thanked: 1546 times
Been thanked: 448 times

Re: Problems with the plain meaning of words in Mt 27?

Post #146

Post by onewithhim »

postroad wrote: [Replying to post 143 by polonius.advice] To me it is. And if people die and are resurected repeatedly I see an unresolvable contradiction. This contradiction somehow resolves itself by having different classes of resurected beings. Doesn't work for me, but having had such a breakthrough on the text I am content to let the matter rest.
I think the breakthrough on the text is what the WTS says about it. The holy ones couldn't have been actually brought back to life because Jesus says he is going to do it "on the last day." (John 6:44) Your version of it contradicts Jesus himself.

polonius
Prodigy
Posts: 3904
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2015 3:03 pm
Location: Oregon
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Problems with the plain meaning of words in Mt 27?

Post #147

Post by polonius »

onewithhim wrote:
postroad wrote: [Replying to post 143 by polonius.advice] To me it is. And if people die and are resurected repeatedly I see an unresolvable contradiction. This contradiction somehow resolves itself by having different classes of resurected beings. Doesn't work for me, but having had such a breakthrough on the text I am content to let the matter rest.
I think the breakthrough on the text is what the WTS says about it. The holy ones couldn't have been actually brought back to life because Jesus says he is going to do it "on the last day." (John 6:44) Your version of it contradicts Jesus himself.
RESPONSE: Not at all. Actually, two different things are bing spoken of. Matthew is speaking about a physical resurrection of many people which occurred when Jesus dies. John is speaking about salvation upon the end of time.

Actually, these statements are speaking of two different things.

Matthew 27:52 52The tombs also were opened, and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised.53After his resurrection they came out of the tombs and entered the holy city and appeared to many.

Meaning: Raised back to life on the day Jesus died.

John 6:44 44No one can come to me unless drawn by the Father who sent me; and I will raise that person up on the last day.

Meaning: Salvation to heaven on the last day.

User avatar
onewithhim
Savant
Posts: 10934
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:56 pm
Location: Norwich, CT
Has thanked: 1546 times
Been thanked: 448 times

Re: Problems with the plain meaning of words in Mt 27?

Post #148

Post by onewithhim »

polonius.advice wrote:
onewithhim wrote:
postroad wrote: [Replying to post 143 by polonius.advice] To me it is. And if people die and are resurected repeatedly I see an unresolvable contradiction. This contradiction somehow resolves itself by having different classes of resurected beings. Doesn't work for me, but having had such a breakthrough on the text I am content to let the matter rest.
I think the breakthrough on the text is what the WTS says about it. The holy ones couldn't have been actually brought back to life because Jesus says he is going to do it "on the last day." (John 6:44) Your version of it contradicts Jesus himself.
RESPONSE: Not at all. Actually, two different things are bing spoken of. Matthew is speaking about a physical resurrection of many people which occurred when Jesus dies. John is speaking about salvation upon the end of time.

Actually, these statements are speaking of two different things.

Matthew 27:52 52The tombs also were opened, and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised.53After his resurrection they came out of the tombs and entered the holy city and appeared to many.

Meaning: Raised back to life on the day Jesus died.

John 6:44 44No one can come to me unless drawn by the Father who sent me; and I will raise that person up on the last day.

Meaning: Salvation to heaven on the last day.
I may be slow, but I think I'm pretty clear on this. You're right that the two scriptures are speaking of different things. In Matthew it is not a resurrection but corpses being thrown up out of their graves. John speaks of the actual resurrection of dead people back to life.

If people were actually raised up back to life, surely that event would have been mentioned by other Bible writers. They are silent on the event.

And all people will not be raised to heaven. Most of the people who were ever born will be raised back to life in a physical body, here on Earth.

Isaiah 45:18; Psalm 37:9-11,29


.

postroad
Prodigy
Posts: 2882
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 9:58 am

Re: Problems with the plain meaning of words in Mt 27?

Post #149

Post by postroad »

[Replying to post 148 by onewithhim]
Have it your way then. If no one will be raised until the last day then indeed Lazerus himself was never raised to life by Jesus and the authors all lied about it. Let us all quickly tear their accounts from our Bibles. The account appears in both Luke and John.
Luke the liar even has Jesus bringing another person to life.

Luke 8:51-56New International Version (NIV)

51 When he arrived at the house of Jairus, he did not let anyone go in with him except Peter, John and James, and the child’s father and mother. 52 Meanwhile, all the people were wailing and mourning for her. “Stop wailing,� Jesus said. “She is not dead but asleep.�o

53 They laughed at him, knowing that she was dead. 54 But he took her by the hand and said, “My child, get up!� 55 Her spirit returned, and at once she stood up. Then I yJesus told them to give her something to eat. 56 Her parents were astonished, but he ordered them not to tell anyone what had happened.
yes she was dead. Her spirit had vacated the premises. It had gone to wherever a persons spirit goes when they die and that person presumably had to die again. Did anyone notice that Jesus lied. Why yes he did bear false witness. That girl was not in a deep sleep. She was dead by any definition. The spirit had left her body and not just momentarily. The mourning was already in progress.

User avatar
JehovahsWitness
Savant
Posts: 22822
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
Has thanked: 892 times
Been thanked: 1331 times
Contact:

Re: Problems with the plain meaning of words in Mt 27?

Post #150

Post by JehovahsWitness »

postroad wrote: [Replying to post 148 by onewithhim]
Have it your way then. If no one will be raised until the last day then indeed Lazerus himself was never raised to life by Jesus and the authors all lied about it.
Lazarus and the other 8 cases of resurrections mentioned in scripture, all died again.

Jesus was the first to be raised to eternal life; he was the first to be raised to immortality as a spirit,. Nobody, not even king David, went to heaven beforeally Jesus opended the way there.
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681


"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" -
Romans 14:8

Post Reply